-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 03-04-2004, 10:25 AM
Miataracer's Avatar
Miataracer Miataracer is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Miataracer Send a message via Yahoo to Miataracer
Re: CR-VTEC discussion

why no more b16 crank?
__________________


LS1 RX-7 Zoom Zoom
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-04-2004, 08:18 PM
liquidflame8 liquidflame8 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 211
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
because you would lose displacement
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-04-2004, 11:18 PM
Jas_M Jas_M is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 962
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jas_M Send a message via Yahoo to Jas_M
Hey Miata, did you get the B18 put in yet?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-05-2004, 12:09 AM
94tegRS's Avatar
94tegRS 94tegRS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: CR-VTEC discussion

ok, thats better for compression, a good question is, have you thought about tuning, what ECU program are you going with? I like the AEM EMS(never used any but from the details on the site it looks like it has TONS of functions) but runs 1500 bucks plus options, hondatra s200 starts at 295, but to tune it yourself you gotta add like 500 bucks more worht of stuff I think and i even think dual stage launch control is like another add on fee. and the Zdyne super ECU cost like 1k+
__________________
current
-84 datsun 720 4x4(2nd time)-93 accord-90 camry V6-90 warrior-94 300ex
history:
-01 R1-04 daytona 600-94 teg RS-95 teg LS
-91 teg RS-92 teg GSR-94 civic CX hatch (3 times)
-94 civic DX-96 civic HX-97 Accord LX-72 superbeetle
-74 beetle-84 silverado-66 c10-74 maverick-78 280z
-84 200sx-86 tercel wagon-95 mustang V6
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-05-2004, 12:13 AM
Miataracer's Avatar
Miataracer Miataracer is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Miataracer Send a message via Yahoo to Miataracer
Re: CR-VTEC discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jas_M
Hey Miata, did you get the B18 put in yet?
started a post in the lets get technical forum... the main part of the swap will happen starting this weekend
__________________


LS1 RX-7 Zoom Zoom
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-06-2004, 09:25 PM
nickzed20 nickzed20 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: CR-VTEC discussion

Ok, guys… by no means am I a b-series expert. I just feel that there has been a lot of shit in here that just stood out as retarded. Some stuff I said might be wrong, but I highly doubt it. I didn’t want to do this, and quickly through info together off the top of my head to prove a point to some guys.

Upon further research, im sure anything else could be corrected.

Quote:
As far as the actual CR-VTEC however, do you plan on de-stroking it with the B17a crank? Or no? You could either keep the shitty r/s ratio...
Why is the R/S ration on the CR-Vtec “shitty”? I don’t think its shitty… its all a compromise. It might not be as good to rev really high, but it definitely gives advantages in other ways.

Quote:
OR I belive endyne will make custom lenmght high strenght rods to get you a near perfect r/s
I don’t quite understand what you mean by this. You want to keep the stock B20b/Z crank, but throw on some super-long rods? That doesn’t make sense. If it was that easy everyone would do it. Running longer rods would just have piston-to-head clearance issues.

Quote:
Chances are I'd see about the custom lenght endyne rods as well... just imagine a 2.1L CRVTEC with a near perfect r/s!?
the only way to make 2.1L would be to stroke the engine even more or boring the cylinders. I don’t see how stroking the engine would “improve” the r/s ratio. If you are talking about going with a larger bore, that is possible with re-Sleeving. However you wont have a “perfect” r/s.

Quote:
The b20z block is very turbo friendly
how so? How is it soooooo much better then doing a B18? It has skinnier sleeves.

Quote:
B17 crank (b16 if b17 unavailable), ITR cams, JE rods and pistons (11 or so compression), B20z block, B16 head, Skunk2 throttle body, DC Sports 4-1 for b18, GSR tranny (LS for turbo), JUN flywheel, yada yada yada
Why would you use an LS tranny for turbo? This will just hold back your RPM, and slow down spool. Also, if going through all the trouble to make a CR-Vtec, just to turn around and throw a B16 crank into it is a complete waste IMO. Why not just get a B16 and sleeve it to the same bore, eliminating the hassles of vtec conversion.

Quote:
In my opinion, why de-stroke it? A B17a crank will put it roughly at 1.9L... why use the B20 block if you're not gonna put out at least 2.0L? It would be easier and less expensive to go LSVTEC otherwise....
That completely defeats the purpose. Just doing an LS-Vtec instead of a B20 with B17 crank doesn’t make sense. You are talking about de-stroking it with the B17 crank to get a higher r/s. Why are you comparing it with the same r/s engine as you originally had, except with smaller bore?

Quote:
But yeah, a t3/t4 on low compression with an LS tranny would be insane.... imagine a 60 shot on it to spool the turbo? Can we say 10's? Don't doubt it.....
I highly doubt 10s, you would have to make the chassis REALLY light, and have some super sticky tires. Even still, I don’t see it. This isn’t the fast and the furious where every car runs “10 seconds or less” y0~!

Quote:
Skunk2: Intake Manifold, Cams, Titanium Dual Valve srpings, retainers
Spoon Sports Cam gears
CTR pistons
Overbored TB
JDM 4-1 Header
Comptech exhaust
AEM CAI

then the mandatory ignition/fuel uprades...

easily 250+ to the wheels........ an all motor monster.
No way that will yield anywhere near 250whp. I would guess, 220whp TOPS. I highly doubt that even, get a better cam... It doesn’t even have a PnP…. Go look for a 250whp b-series engine, and take a look at their mods.

Quote:
but that extra .2L of displacement, coupled with low compression pistons will most likely make up for the absence of VTEC. Those .2L may not make much of a difference to start... but add FI and watch a 1.8L non-VTEC DOHC motors' HP pull far away from a 1.6L DOHC non-VTEC.
what are you saying? 0.2L displacement is A LOT. Its what makes the B18C faster then the B16A.

Quote:
The B16 block is shorter then the b18, and as far as i know the B20 is just about a inch or so taller then the b18.
As far as I know, ALL B18s have the same deck height as the B20B/Z. The B20A, and B21A are the only b-series taller then the B18 blocks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Miataracer
wow... i cant believe how much bs was flying around in this old post.
Wow, someone who agrees. Maybe it is just because this thread is old? I don’t know, but its sad to see this as an archive where people can easily refer to the information.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-06-2004, 11:13 PM
94tegRS's Avatar
94tegRS 94tegRS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Re: Re: CR-VTEC discussion

I am not trying to proove anything you said wrong, just giving my .02

Quote:
Originally Posted by nickzed20


I don’t quite understand what you mean by this. You want to keep the stock B20b/Z crank, but throw on some super-long rods? That doesn’t make sense. If it was that easy everyone would do it. Running longer rods would just have piston-to-head clearance issues.
I know with a stroker kit the pin boss is moved up on the piston so with the increased stroke, the piston doesnt go hit the head, you could probably have something done with stock stroke, but a longer rod and a moved pin boss, would be the same effect, just jkeeping the piston from coming in contact with head. but now we are talking about full on custon rods and pistons, and we are talking some serious dough there.


Quote:
how so? How is it soooooo much better then doing a B18? It has skinnier sleeves.
I havent torn off a B18 head, but I know on my B20, all the sleeves are the same peice, maybe the B18 they arent, i would assume they were though so I am not sure why it would be better.

Quote:
Why would you use an LS tranny for turbo? This will just hold back your RPM, and slow down spool. Also, if going through all the trouble to make a CR-Vtec, just to turn around and throw a B16 crank into it is a complete waste IMO. Why not just get a B16 and sleeve it to the same bore, eliminating the hassles of vtec conversion.
(this one is all guess) off he line it might take longer to spool cuz you have to get to a higher speed before the RPM's are at the point where youd get full boost, but once you are going, when you shift you willl never drop below the rpms you make full boost at, and if you had a quick ratio trans youd be shifting more often not keeping the turbo full spool, so wiht the longer gears you have a longer amoutn of time where you are making the power and it is better? maybe though if you had some setup like hondata and had full throttle shift to where you never let off the gas and let the turbine slow down the shorter gears might be better as long as you can shift pretty quick.


Quote:
That completely defeats the purpose. Just doing an LS-Vtec instead of a B20 with B17 crank doesn’t make sense. You are talking about de-stroking it with the B17 crank to get a higher r/s. Why are you comparing it with the same r/s engine as you originally had, except with smaller bore?
exactly right, it would just be cheaper but not in any way better


Quote:
As far as I know, ALL B18s have the same deck height as the B20B/Z. The B20A, and B21A are the only b-series taller then the B18 blocks.
as far as I know the B20 is the same exact block design as the B18 just a 3mm larger bore.
__________________
current
-84 datsun 720 4x4(2nd time)-93 accord-90 camry V6-90 warrior-94 300ex
history:
-01 R1-04 daytona 600-94 teg RS-95 teg LS
-91 teg RS-92 teg GSR-94 civic CX hatch (3 times)
-94 civic DX-96 civic HX-97 Accord LX-72 superbeetle
-74 beetle-84 silverado-66 c10-74 maverick-78 280z
-84 200sx-86 tercel wagon-95 mustang V6
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-06-2004, 11:19 PM
GScivic7's Avatar
GScivic7 GScivic7 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,249
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GScivic7 Send a message via MSN to GScivic7
Re: Re: Re: Re: CR-VTEC discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 94tegRS
I havent torn off a B18 head, but I know on my B20, all the sleeves are the same peice, maybe the B18 they arent, i would assume they were though so I am not sure why it would be better.
Nope, the B18 sleeves are not 1 piece. That's pretty much the only bad thing about boosting a b20. The 1 piece sleeves. Get the cylinders resleeved and you have one stout engine ready for boost with a good amount of torque.
__________________

Empty Pockets Racing Member #1
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-06-2004, 11:57 PM
94tegRS's Avatar
94tegRS 94tegRS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: CR-VTEC discussion

wouldnt one peice be better? seems like one contiinuous sleeve for all 4 cylinders would hold up better than 4 individual sleeves.
__________________
current
-84 datsun 720 4x4(2nd time)-93 accord-90 camry V6-90 warrior-94 300ex
history:
-01 R1-04 daytona 600-94 teg RS-95 teg LS
-91 teg RS-92 teg GSR-94 civic CX hatch (3 times)
-94 civic DX-96 civic HX-97 Accord LX-72 superbeetle
-74 beetle-84 silverado-66 c10-74 maverick-78 280z
-84 200sx-86 tercel wagon-95 mustang V6
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-07-2004, 12:31 AM
GScivic7's Avatar
GScivic7 GScivic7 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,249
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GScivic7 Send a message via MSN to GScivic7
Re: CR-VTEC discussion

The 1 piece sleeves are a lot thinner than the individual ones, so they can't handle boost as well.
__________________

Empty Pockets Racing Member #1
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-07-2004, 01:36 AM
94tegRS's Avatar
94tegRS 94tegRS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: CR-VTEC discussion

arent they only thinner though because of the bore, not because they are one peice? so the downfall isnt because one peice is weaker than individual but tht they are thinner because of the increased bore.
__________________
current
-84 datsun 720 4x4(2nd time)-93 accord-90 camry V6-90 warrior-94 300ex
history:
-01 R1-04 daytona 600-94 teg RS-95 teg LS
-91 teg RS-92 teg GSR-94 civic CX hatch (3 times)
-94 civic DX-96 civic HX-97 Accord LX-72 superbeetle
-74 beetle-84 silverado-66 c10-74 maverick-78 280z
-84 200sx-86 tercel wagon-95 mustang V6
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-07-2004, 02:02 AM
GScivic7's Avatar
GScivic7 GScivic7 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,249
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GScivic7 Send a message via MSN to GScivic7
Re: CR-VTEC discussion

yah, cause they are thinner, I don't know if they were the same size whether they would stand up to boost any better or not though.

Here's a little write up straight from a Honda engineer about the 1 piece design. http://dwolsten.tripod.com/articles/jan96a.html
__________________

Empty Pockets Racing Member #1
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-07-2004, 02:27 AM
94tegRS's Avatar
94tegRS 94tegRS is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,958
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: CR-VTEC discussion

I never knew that the B20 was the first tocome with a one peice sleeve like that, at least thats what i got from this article.
__________________
current
-84 datsun 720 4x4(2nd time)-93 accord-90 camry V6-90 warrior-94 300ex
history:
-01 R1-04 daytona 600-94 teg RS-95 teg LS
-91 teg RS-92 teg GSR-94 civic CX hatch (3 times)
-94 civic DX-96 civic HX-97 Accord LX-72 superbeetle
-74 beetle-84 silverado-66 c10-74 maverick-78 280z
-84 200sx-86 tercel wagon-95 mustang V6
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-07-2004, 01:01 PM
94civic's Avatar
94civic 94civic is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 832
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Well, for non-turbo peeps...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phatwhippin_CRX
[url]

But this is what I;d do....

Skunk2: Intake Manifold, Cams, Titanium Dual Valve srpings, retainers
Spoon Sports Cam gears
CTR pistons
Overbored TB
JDM 4-1 Header
Comptech exhaust
AEM CAI

then the mandatory ignition/fuel uprades...

easily 250+ to the wheels........ an all motor monster.

WOW. i would think that since you have over 700 post that you would have been here long enough to know better. there is now way in hell that setp would make 250whp. it probably won't even touch 200whp. also the valve spring are not titanium the retainers are. i'm guessing that since you added the spoon cam gears it would add 15 whp cause its madd jdm yO! also if you think it would make that much power you should try looking for a better header like an-r, hytech,smsp,dtr,etc... and you should try looking for a better exhaust cause that comptech one isn't going to cut it. please think before you write something
__________________
1994 civic ex - b16a sir2 w/lsd
too much to list
http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/423478
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-07-2004, 03:39 PM
Miataracer's Avatar
Miataracer Miataracer is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,826
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Miataracer Send a message via Yahoo to Miataracer
Re: CR-VTEC discussion

I believe another slight problem with the 1 piece sleeves is that since they are connected they get hot spots where the two clyinders come together... I used to know of an EXCELLENT web site that had engine drawings and went through how the b20 was developed and its strengths and weaknesses but a while back I had to reload windows on my computer so I lost all my links. I haven't been able to find it again
__________________


LS1 RX-7 Zoom Zoom
Reply With Quote
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What should I expect to run in a stock ls-vtec? And also a cr-vtec? sheemo3 Engineering/ Technical 0 09-08-2003 03:30 PM
What should I expect to run in a stock ls-vtec? And also a cr-vtec? sheemo3 Engineering/ Technical 0 09-08-2003 03:29 PM
cr-vtec or gsr mikeowen '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV 10 03-28-2002 07:02 PM
CR-VTEC in Brisbane, Australia j_bongo '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV 3 02-11-2002 05:41 PM
CR-VTEC in a 93 hatch? seantree '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV 4 01-27-2002 06:12 PM

Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '92-'95 Civic | EL | Civic Hybrid | Civic GX NGV


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts