 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
 |
 Show Printable Version |  Email this Page | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
09-03-2004, 10:02 PM
|
#31 | ||
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, New York
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
And shorter wheel base
 Sry we left u outa the convo for so long lol it is your thread.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 10:03 PM
|
#32 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: la puente, California
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
so is it better???
__________________
Simon R 2001 Silverado W/T 4.3 124,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 10:09 PM
|
#33 | ||
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, New York
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
Evo is a better track car subaru is a better rally due to its shorter wheel base. Haveing more hp doesnt always mean its the best. Prime ex the NSX aka the golden child of performanc in my opinion.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 10:13 PM
|
#34 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: la puente, California
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
ill let you know when I find that tread
__________________
Simon R 2001 Silverado W/T 4.3 124,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 10:16 PM
|
#35 | |||
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, New York
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 10:30 PM
|
#36 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: la puente, California
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
why is that??
__________________
Simon R 2001 Silverado W/T 4.3 124,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 10:38 PM
|
#37 | ||
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, New York
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
Why is it ashame??
Because its running 20 hp less then what u paid for thats what.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 10:48 PM
|
#38 | |
|
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kewaskum, Wisconsin
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Wow i didnt expect to get this many replys
 . But Once this race happens (still have to get the full time job, then the evo will be mine) I'll let everyone know the results. Hell, maybe I'll post some pics of his stang and my evo and some running photos for everyone! But If everything goes according to plan this race may happen next year either in spring or summer, So I'll keep everyone posted.PS- Keep the posts comming! |
|
|
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 10:54 PM
|
#39 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: la puente, California
Posts: 1,606
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
Quote:
__________________
Simon R 2001 Silverado W/T 4.3 124,000 |
||
|
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 11:03 PM
|
#40 | |||
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, New York
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
Quote:
It like a pyramid if a block isnt there U cant just keep putting more on can you?
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
09-03-2004, 11:22 PM
|
#41 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: I dont know, Maryland
Posts: 457
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
You know the Evo is maken 271 HP at the flywheel. At the wheels its only maken around 230 HP, but I think the performance is way impresive for that power. Motor Trend and Car And Driver both say they are the same, exept the editers of both magazines said they prefered the Evo over the Sti. The new Evo MR is even faster than the standered Evo. Crazy, but rare in this country.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2004, 08:33 AM
|
#42 | |
|
AF Newbie
Thread starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kewaskum, Wisconsin
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
does anyone know the stats for the 2003 Mach 1 mustangs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2004, 11:27 AM
|
#43 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: I dont know, Maryland
Posts: 457
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
They might have some at fast-autos.net.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-28-2004, 11:41 AM
|
#44 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ellisville, Missouri
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
Quote:
Actually 280 sounds kinda high considering its got all wheel drive and should be losing a lot more than 20hp. |
||
|
|
|
|
09-28-2004, 11:59 AM
|
#45 | ||
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NY, New York
Posts: 5,596
Thanks: 3
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: EVO 8 VS 1069 Ford Mustang Mach 1
As far as im conserned it should ahve 300 hp @ the wheels....
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
