|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|
#16 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Christina Lake
Posts: 117
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Safc Ii
LOL you all are so funny i said my piece and i stand behind my word. Unlike the rest of you i dont need to lie. And i dont need to flame, this is a help board for people who want it. I offer help , take it or leave it. Dont like it dont reply.
PS: not a $30 dollor mod , 255 usually canadian , as i said. and when your running a 16-18 second run from 0-60 1.25 sec shave average is ok , not great.
__________________
I work as a partsman in the BC Area if you need help finding something you cant find pm me here and i will see what i can do. www.lordco.com Better to sit in silence and be thought stupid , then to open your mouth and remove all doubt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 628
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Safc Ii
a second in the 1/4 is ALWAYS great!!!!!! ALWAYS!!! and 1.25 secods 0-60 is a lot closer to 2 seconds in the 1/4. i find is VERY hard to believe, as a car builder and tuner, to pick up that speed with just a plug in module. so again i ask how did you verify.
my standalone engine management system didnt give me 1.25 seconds in the 1/4...how can it give a low compression, low powered, N/A car that in the 0-60. i call BS until someone provides a bit more proof than we counted. i need 1/4 mile times and/or dyno printouts. i caution the original poster to be weary of anything that promises big power...unless it significantly changes the egine VE. the laws of physics come into play, and you CANNOT gain that much power without altering the specs inside the motor. its impossiable without altering compression ratio's, camshaft profiles, head design, motor displacement, etc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
AF Newbie
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: North Bay
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Safc Ii
well i can see this is turning into a rather pointless argument, wollf i dont think you should post until u have some actually evidence, but i guess what im trying to ask here is should i bother buying the safc 2 if i dont have access to a dyno and will have to tune my self?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: tampa, Florida
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Safc Ii
Quote:
second the safc is a great mod, dynoed or not. the more supporting mods the better gains you will see. you can tune these yourself and get reasonable gains, but it wont come near as much power as you can get out of it with a dyno or wide band. safc is the way to go unless you megasquiet, greddy emange, or some other standalone. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 104
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Safc Ii
Quote:
I can add some personal experience here...I have a friend who used Jet with their car. And I drove it at the track MYSELF and noticed very little,if no difference. I don't know wether it's compatible with a Neon (I don't pretend to know it all). But keep in mind-if they were that great on a Neon or any other car we would all know about it. People wont spend thousands on turbos, nitrious, etc if they could do better for WAY less money. And IMO I'd rather have something that I can tweek myself to get it exactly the way I want it. But then again that's just my opinion. And if there is proof that it can save me that much time on the track i'd love to see it. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
Tuning Neons since '97
![]() |
Re: Safc Ii
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
AF Regular
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: tampa, Florida
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Safc Ii
Quote:
but you can always go to the junk yard and for about 30 bucks you can get a used one of a old body 300z......since its used you probly only get 1-2 seconds off |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 628
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Safc Ii
sounds good, especially after teh thousands i have invested into my own car. heck, just blew $2000 on my standalone, $1000 on my big turbo, $500 on my fuel system...when i could have gone cheap.
there is a reason to spend money. its done so that i can run 11's on street tires, get 30+miles per gallon, and not have to worry about blowing crap up |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|