|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 | |
|
AF -Advisor
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sudbury
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Interesting Oil Reading from a GM Engineer
My experience is that I am a certified fluid power engineer and I have dealt with MANY fluid systems in my life along with my other jobs.
I am not forcing my opinion on anyone, I am showing them photos in my threads showing how the oil is definitely getting the varnish and sludge out of the system even after 150 miles. I just hate it when people have no experience with a product, but yet are experts in it. I have the product, I am using the product, I am testing the product and yes, I paid FULL price for the product and ordered it online. This stuff works and wait until I cut open the oil filter to show proof. Here is my Auto-RX log: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=385384 Read it for yourself, and take a look at the photos, they speak volumes.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 303
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Geez gettin alittle excited aren't you ?
Like I said, I am presenting a differing and countering point of view for others to judge...too bad so sad if you don't agree...not a big deal...10-4 ..and it's your money... Yelling at me makes no difference, I am just learning and don't know everything about everything.....but why don't you go over there (BITOG) forum and tell him directly how stupid and idiotic all this is and share all your experiences/expertise and product knowledge.... ? I am just a reader and learner.....
__________________
1999 Blazer LS 4WD 4.3L "W" 2004 Silverado 2500HD Duramax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
AF -Advisor
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sudbury
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Interesting Oil Reading from a GM Engineer
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: River Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 303
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Interesting Oil Reading from a GM Engineer
Quote:
No not that I am talking about challenging what bbobynski says as you say bullshit. While not everyone that disagrees with you is an idiot....you as the moderator must be an example of level, objective, and clear thinking as our mentor and moderator with your experiences. Please overcome your close-mindedness and help us sift through fact from fiction, intersperse your expertise, but don't call us idiots or discount our view points even if they disagree with your own...we are all blazer owners and compadres trying to solve problems ...that's it....no big deal there is no room for ego's here.... So lighten up as we all can learn from each other.... Thanks
__________________
1999 Blazer LS 4WD 4.3L "W" 2004 Silverado 2500HD Duramax
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
AF -Advisor
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sudbury
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Re: Re: Interesting Oil Reading from a GM Engineer
Quote:
This has nothing to do with you, I have a problem with the guy's thought on this. They are just plain opinion. He has never used it, but yet can comment on it like it is a scam? Comon now, who is lacking in objectivity. I never called you an idiot and if I did, I am sorry. Just sick of people calling me an idiot for trying out things for your guys.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
AF Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Plainfield, Wisconsin
Posts: 187
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Interesting Oil Reading from a GM Engineer
Just want to add that GM is in business to sell vehicles not lubricants. Their engineers may spec out new specifications for lubes but it is chemists from additive suppliers and base oil producers that actually do the formulating along with people from lubricant manufacturers. Believe what you want about the differences/advantages/disadvantages of a syn. vs. conventional but my $$$ goes to the synthetics. Sure, in meeting the new API specs many oils may claim to utilize a synthetic base but in reality it is most likely a group 2 base oil. I could go on and on about the benefits of syn. but you need to decide for yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|