brand listings - Page 2

sr20de4evr · #16 02-21-2005, 01:08 PM

nevermind I thought you were talking about the one actually posted in this thread, not the link

wtf is with JVC in the highest category on that link?

curtis73 · #17 02-21-2005, 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diceman83

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED:
-------------------------------------------
Focal (borderline good/highly recommended)
Image Dynamics
Kove (borderline good/highly recommended)
McIntosh
MMATS
Morel
OZ Audio
PPI (old stuff before they were directed)
RE Audio (resonant engineering
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
.

There it is

JVC Digifine is rated so highly for its incredible build quality and numbers. The regular JVC is a good bang for the buck, but I've found the Digifine line to be exceptional.

bumpinstang77 · #18 02-21-2005, 02:50 PM

We were talking about the link..... put it in good but it is def. not great

Diceman83 · #19 02-23-2005, 10:28 PM

Bump to keep it active...

Are we happy with it now? I added a few missing things, and put "JVC (Digifine line)" in the good section.

bumpinstang77 · #20 02-24-2005, 11:18 AM

fuck JVC and their digiline

Mannyb18b · #21 02-24-2005, 12:04 PM

ngsm13 · #22 02-24-2005, 12:09 PM

Who's the crackhead that has the little "(borderline good/highly recommended)" next to focal...are you stupid. They make some of the best SQ speakers and woofers in the world...

nG

Diceman83 · #23 02-24-2005, 10:21 PM

ok... no need to call names... I know nothing, I'm just doing what you guys say... I'll scrap the Digifine crap, and erase the (boardline...) from Focal.

ngsm13 · #24 02-25-2005, 12:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diceman83

ok... no need to call names... I know nothing, I'm just doing what you guys say... I'll scrap the Digifine crap, and erase the (boardline...) from Focal.

No insult intended...Focal is just great CLEAN SQ! peace

NG

sr20de4evr · #25 02-25-2005, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ngsm13

No insult intended...Focal is just great CLEAN SQ! peace

NG

only the top lines, the med-low lines are moderate at best. I was pretty disappointed with my polyglass and the access are even worse

ponchonutty · #26 02-25-2005, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by curtis73

There it is

JVC Digifine is rated so highly for its incredible build quality and numbers. The regular JVC is a good bang for the buck, but I've found the Digifine line to be exceptional.

I 2nd the Digifine from JVC or well at least the KDSH99. I've had this piece since it was first released and loved every minute of it. It has so many parameters that you can adjust for the sound you need. It really is a rock solid head unit. It is definately better than most of the Eclipse units I sell for 2 to 3x's the money.

bumpinstang77 · #27 02-25-2005, 12:26 PM

That was me crackwhore......just cuz of what sr20 said..... I had heard from a fair amount of problems out of the lower lines.

ngsm13 · #28 02-25-2005, 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sr20de4evr

only the top lines, the med-low lines are moderate at best. I was pretty disappointed with my polyglass and the access are even worse

This is true, I guess they should be noted as such...but High End Focal is great! peace

NG

PaulD · #29 02-25-2005, 09:17 PM

Focal midranges do not have good midbass response, a midbass driver is pretty much a requirement. I have had a set of focal polykevlars for quite a while now - maybe 8 years.

Diceman83 · #30 02-27-2005, 06:58 PM

so do we want to sticky this and lock it? I can email/IM the code I used to make my formatting if you'd like, PaulD. Or I can just post a new thread with it. Just let me know!

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD