|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Forced Induction Discuss topics relating to turbochargers, superchargers, and nitrous oxide systems. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
aight, but i might not even get the 200sx or the prelude, i am looking at some other cars right now.
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which one??????
well you should probably look into what kind of racing you are going to be doing, if any, and take that into consideration when deciding.
rear wheel drive will almost always be a better platform no matter what kind of racing you do. also with what you know about the sr2o0det now you could get a 240sx and put that in it.
__________________
Cars are like music. If it ain't fast it ain't shit. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which one??????
yeah, i was just about to say to find a car that you would want for your type or racing. Those cars mentioned are both FWD, if you are interested in a nissan and the sr20det swap. Look into the s13 and s14 240sx's...great RWD cars!!
__________________
1988 conquest TSI -Lots of mods, finally finished WOOT!! ![]() Horsepower sells cars, Torque wins races! |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
what about a 3000gt twin turbo?
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which one??????
they sound like they would be a better car than they actually are. the engine is not all that common (in fact i cant think of anything else that it comes in). There is not much aftermarket support for it. They are a very heavy cars in general. I wouldnt recommend it for someone like you who is just gettin into cars.
I'm not hating on it by any means these are just opinions on the car (recenty I have become leary of all DSM's (Diamond Star Motors=a collaboration between mitsubishi and dodge to make cars such as: laser/talon/eclipse, 3000gt/stealth, conquest/starion)). i would wholeheartedly suggest going with the 240sx because of its price, configuration, aftermarket support, and wealth of knowledge that abounds on the internet about it.
__________________
Cars are like music. If it ain't fast it ain't shit. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which one??????
oh and you will be able to get more power out the the single turbo I4 sr20det (and probably far cheaper) than V6TT in the 3KGT.
__________________
Cars are like music. If it ain't fast it ain't shit. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which one??????
yeah, you'll have better times slips on auto-x or any racing with the 240 also because of size and weight, a TT v6 isnt the lightest thing around..lol
__________________
1988 conquest TSI -Lots of mods, finally finished WOOT!! ![]() Horsepower sells cars, Torque wins races! |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
i dont want a 240sx, i want a 200sx, and arent they fwd cars? the only kind of racing i will be doing with the car is drag, i wont drift.
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which one??????
the USDM is FWD, but the other 200sx is RWD. The 200sx in america can be made pretty fast, small, light, go for the SR20det swap!!
__________________
1988 conquest TSI -Lots of mods, finally finished WOOT!! ![]() Horsepower sells cars, Torque wins races! |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
nice, would it matter if i got a se-r, since i would be getting a engine swap anyways.also, which kind of sr20det engine would be the best, s13, s14, or s15?http://www.xatracing.com/xatracingpa...sanengine.html
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which one??????
whoa, wait a minute. i hope you dont think that rwd is only for drifting, drifting isnt racing. RWD will give you better times in autocross, road/track racing, and DRAG racing especially.
i am under the impression that the s13,14,and 15 are all pretty much the same engine as long as it is an sr20det. i think any difference would be in the factory tuning.(could be wrong as they may have different internals, but if your making serious power you would probably change those anyhow). probably all the same block and similar heads, same mounts and tranny bolt pattern.
__________________
Cars are like music. If it ain't fast it ain't shit. |
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which one??????
RWD generally has a better weight distribution.
__________________
-Cory 1992 Nissan 240sx KA24DE-Turbo: The Showcar Stock internals. Daily driven. 12.6@122mph 496whp/436wtq at 25psi |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Which one??????
Quote:
i dont think you can use the sr20det from the 240sx in the 200. The engine sits horizontal to the front of the 200sx because it is FWD, the 240sx engine sits parellel with the body of the car because it is RWD...Hope this helps....
__________________
1988 conquest TSI -Lots of mods, finally finished WOOT!! ![]() Horsepower sells cars, Torque wins races! |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which one??????
yeah i didnt realize that the usdm and jdm 200sx se-r's were different configurations
__________________
Cars are like music. If it ain't fast it ain't shit. |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: Which one??????
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|