Why the STi and not the Evo?

[SabreKhan]

STi has done little to combat the new MR in the USDM. I wish FHI would make a stripped STi for limited production just to show the MR who really has the better car. Make about 1000 of them as an MR-beater and sell the rest of the STi's the way they already come. Subaru is fully capable, but the car just won't sell at that trim level because people (especially Americans) want a stereo and an A/C and the like... and we don't want to pay extra for it.

[AlienEvolution]

part of it depends on where you live, AWD in the WRX is a very nice thing to have..... either way, i think the subaru is better than the evo in all the aspects i have knowledge of.

[BB1970]

Originally Posted by SabreKhan

The 3000gt, even in the FWD non-turbo versions, is quite a capable sportscar. It's big and heavy, so it rides quite nicely. The cockpit is like flying a fighter jet, the way the gauges are set up. Track times for the FWD version are not so hot, but it's definitely fun to drive. And with the right mix and match of year-model and domestic-market parts it's a sexy looking car, too. The VR-4, on the other hand, is badass straight out of the box, from every angle: technology, performance, and aesthetics all in one package.

Why thank you. he he

im an impreza fan myself too. great cars im just in the middle of getting one myself.

[Turbo Meg]

They are both great cars, I just traded my 03 WRX in on a new 05 Evo VIII. It came down to a better deal, got the Evo for $1500 under the sticker and no destination charge.
I did drive both cars and love them both but all around I feel the Evo is a better car and free oil changes for first 45K mile also helps.

If Subaru had matched the discount I might be driving the STI