-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 10-19-2004, 11:08 PM
engineer's Avatar
engineer engineer is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 331
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to engineer
Re: Re: Re: Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

Quote:
Originally Posted by TatII
congrats you win the idiot of the thread award. how is a fwd goin to get better traction off the line? FWDs are the worst. when you acelerate, the weight shifts to the rear taking the weight off the front drive wheels. and when you actually start to make power ( 200whp ) the car spins its tires uncontrollably. go drive a turbo honda and you'll see what i mean.
damn u beat me 2 it! where do these idiots get the idea that fwd is better (my bets on gran turismo)??? some of them say handling is better too its just such BS... sorry 2 tell u but fwd is worse in pretty much everyway compared to rwd... and there is no comparison between 350 and type S? but doesnt the 350z cost twice as much as the RSX? i mean, u get what u paid 4 right?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-19-2004, 11:09 PM
kman10587's Avatar
kman10587 kman10587 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,872
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to kman10587
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

FWD is better for economy and shitty weather. That's about it.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-19-2004, 11:17 PM
Savior1974's Avatar
Savior1974 Savior1974 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 522
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

350 owns rsx type s in EVERY category. End of story.
__________________
1998 Eclipse GSX (Sold)

Act 2600, Apexi 3" downpipe, 3" exhaust, Hks 3"-5" muffler, Greddy TypeS BOV, Autometer Boost/Vac & Air fuel Gauge, Garrett T3/T4 60-1 turbo (Only boosting 15 psi) Tial 38mm Wastegate, Spearco FMIC, Greedy Profec B2, HKS Turbo Timer Type, Dejon Intake/K&N Air Filter, DSMLink, Eprom ECU, 950cc Fuel Injectors, Walbro 255 HP Fuel Pump, Aeromotive FPR, Drilled/Slotted Rotors, B&M Short Shifter
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-20-2004, 02:13 AM
NIN881 NIN881 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

There is nothing fun about fwd. I also heard that teh 350z handles like a porshe (spelling?). No problems with slippage here. the Z needs more power to even test the stock suspension. If I wasn't a muscle car freak I would be saving up for one instead of putting money into the mustang.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-20-2004, 06:22 AM
drunken monkey's Avatar
drunken monkey drunken monkey is offline
Razor Sharp Twit
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,865
Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
FWD/RWD handling/traction.

depends on how much power/torque you have.
Peugeot have always had excellent handling on their GTi models
Same with the Honda Integra+Accord+(new) Civic 'Type-R's.
Alfa 146 GTA, Fiat coupe, Renault Clio 172/182/CUP, Mini CooperS (ignoring the works models).

all fine driving/handling cars, all FWD.
BUT
of course, all under 250BHP......
__________________
AF's Guidelines

Read them.

__________________


Currently in the process of re-hosting my photos.
If any go missing, drop me a PM.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-20-2004, 12:48 PM
NIN881 NIN881 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

It mostly depends on suspension, but they do have different caracteristics. rwd is better off the line and fwd is better in snow. they are econoboxes that they put a little pep into and everybody thinks they are fast and handles better than a vette.

sorry i went on a ramp. but, It is my opinion that rwd performs better and is a lot more fun.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-20-2004, 02:35 PM
MexSiR's Avatar
MexSiR MexSiR is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,310
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to MexSiR
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

No. The 350z is not double in price compared to the RSX-S.

RSX-S (around) 22,500 US
350-Z (around) 29,000 US
__________________
Honda Civic 1999 EBP SiR
Im not as fast as I am furious.
1/4 mile = 15.347 (sealevel)
Porsche RS America
BMW 323 01
Pictures of my ride (Pictures)
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-20-2004, 02:43 PM
NIN881 NIN881 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 79
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z

I would save for the Z. The rsx is more room than the z but performace and styling is more important to me. I like the idea of having a two seater. time to remove the rear seats of the stang and put in a roll cage.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts