|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
FWD is better for economy and shitty weather. That's about it.
|
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
350 owns rsx type s in EVERY category. End of story.
__________________
1998 Eclipse GSX (Sold) ![]() Act 2600, Apexi 3" downpipe, 3" exhaust, Hks 3"-5" muffler, Greddy TypeS BOV, Autometer Boost/Vac & Air fuel Gauge, Garrett T3/T4 60-1 turbo (Only boosting 15 psi) Tial 38mm Wastegate, Spearco FMIC, Greedy Profec B2, HKS Turbo Timer Type, Dejon Intake/K&N Air Filter, DSMLink, Eprom ECU, 950cc Fuel Injectors, Walbro 255 HP Fuel Pump, Aeromotive FPR, Drilled/Slotted Rotors, B&M Short Shifter |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
There is nothing fun about fwd. I also heard that teh 350z handles like a porshe (spelling?). No problems with slippage here. the Z needs more power to even test the stock suspension. If I wasn't a muscle car freak I would be saving up for one instead of putting money into the mustang.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
FWD/RWD handling/traction.
depends on how much power/torque you have. Peugeot have always had excellent handling on their GTi models Same with the Honda Integra+Accord+(new) Civic 'Type-R's. Alfa 146 GTA, Fiat coupe, Renault Clio 172/182/CUP, Mini CooperS (ignoring the works models). all fine driving/handling cars, all FWD. BUT of course, all under 250BHP......
__________________
AF's Guidelines Read them. __________________ ![]() Currently in the process of re-hosting my photos. If any go missing, drop me a PM. |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
It mostly depends on suspension, but they do have different caracteristics. rwd is better off the line and fwd is better in snow. they are econoboxes that they put a little pep into and everybody thinks they are fast and handles better than a vette.
sorry i went on a ramp. but, It is my opinion that rwd performs better and is a lot more fun. |
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
No. The 350z is not double in price compared to the RSX-S.
RSX-S (around) 22,500 US 350-Z (around) 29,000 US
__________________
Honda Civic 1999 EBP SiR Im not as fast as I am furious. 1/4 mile = 15.347 (sealevel) Porsche RS America BMW 323 01 Pictures of my ride (Pictures)
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RSX Type-S VS 350Z
I would save for the Z. The rsx is more room than the z but performace and styling is more important to me. I like the idea of having a two seater. time to remove the rear seats of the stang and put in a roll cage.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|