-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Technical
Register FAQ Community
Technical Discuss different strategies and theories of the racing aspect.
View Poll Results: NOS or Supercharged
NOS (100 ponies) 6 7.79%
Supercharged (100 ponies) 71 92.21%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 08-07-2004, 11:49 AM
christophv's Avatar
christophv christophv is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 304
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
yeah, I also think turbo > s/c -
turbo's gain more boost, right? Or can superchargers do more than 14 psi / 1 bar?
__________________

still searching for a decent dorifto device
"If Nissan Motorsports is NISMO, is Honda Motorsports then HOMO?"
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-07-2004, 12:26 PM
Hyatus Hyatus is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,130
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

get a mountian bike u noob, nitrous oxide is a gas NOS is a name brand as well as nitrous works, and others
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-07-2004, 01:18 PM
Thourun's Avatar
Thourun Thourun is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Thourun
from my understand ing superchargers are better for the low reving cars and turbo's work better for high reving cars.
__________________
1995 3000GT VR-4
Installed: ESP front precat eliminating downpipe, test pipe, RF-1008 K&N, Dejon tool Y pipe, 1G DSM BOV, MSD wires, Guted rear pre cat, ISSPRO EV Marine boost gauge, IPO MBC, EGR blockoffs, Palm m515 dataloger setup, NGK iridium plugs, SPEC stage II clutch 500ft/lb, 5300k HID plug and play setup.

Soon:Topline Engineering ground wires.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-07-2004, 01:22 PM
96TSi's Avatar
96TSi 96TSi is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 663
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to 96TSi
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

depending on the application is turbo > supercharger.

my car has a turbo in it and i couldnt be any happier any other way. a great example of a supercharger being better than a turbo is a damn Cavilier got me off of the line in my AWD.

if i had any other car i would say supercharger is better due to the power on command
__________________
04 SRT-4
03 Evo
96 Talon TSi AWD *dead*
93 Talon TSi AWD *sold*
85 300ZX Turbo
90 300zx Twin Turbo
82 Karen
04 little boy
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-07-2004, 02:06 PM
=OrangeZ='s Avatar
=OrangeZ= =OrangeZ= is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 118
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to =OrangeZ=
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

supercharged all the way
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-07-2004, 08:14 PM
Stroked it Stroked it is offline
AF Newbie
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 42
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

thanks
__________________
Black 79' Monte Carlo
Built 350
TH-400 trans.
3.73 limited rear end
Edelbrock IAS Shocks
14" Cragar Keystone Klassics
60 wide BFGoodrich Radial T/A

Not too bad for $1500
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-07-2004, 08:56 PM
landyacht's Avatar
landyacht landyacht is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 984
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm all about the s/c....last longer than a tank of NOS, so is therefore cheaper in the long run.

Plus i like the whine it makes!
__________________
Mine's an '82 Pontiac Parisienne 4-door sedan!!

- 305 cu inch (5.0L) small block V8 w/ 3spd auto
- 4 barrel carb w/ single exhaust
- No catalytic converter, no posi-trac

NEVER LOSE FAITH IN THE BOAT!!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-07-2004, 10:25 PM
pnoiSR20 pnoiSR20 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 708
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Superchargers is better because u dont have to worry about blowing the motor.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-07-2004, 10:42 PM
Neutrino's Avatar
Neutrino Neutrino is offline
Yaya Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Neutrino
Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Quote:
Originally Posted by pnoiSR20
Superchargers is better because u dont have to worry about blowing the motor.

Yeah you do!!! you have to be very careful with all types of forced induction turbo/super/nitrous, You must make sure you compensate with enough fuel for the extra air, otherwise you'll run lean and...boom.


About the super vs turbo debate, I'm not gonna go into it but from a technical point of view turbos are far better. Of course that is not to say superchargers don't have their place since they are cheaper and easier to install and tune.

Also the concept of turbos are for high rpm power and supers are for low its a Myth.

Recomended reading (especially SaabJohan's posts - he is probably the most knowlegeable guy on AF)
http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...=260247&page=2

and this

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...lay.php?f=1199
__________________

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-07-2004, 10:56 PM
drftk1d's Avatar
drftk1d drftk1d is offline
boost in, apex seals out
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,543
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to drftk1d
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Centrifugal superchargers anyone?
__________________
RX-7 TII
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-07-2004, 11:15 PM
duplox's Avatar
duplox duplox is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 816
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to duplox
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

I wouldn't waste my time with a centrifugal. If you're lookin for the easy way out, centrifugal is the way. I'd rather put more work into turboing or positive displacement supercharging(roots blower, screw type, etc). They'll give much better results, imho.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-07-2004, 11:56 PM
Aneche Aneche is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Aneche
Supercharged.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-08-2004, 03:27 AM
TerminalVelocity's Avatar
TerminalVelocity TerminalVelocity is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TerminalVelocity
Re: Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neutrino
Yeah you do!!! you have to be very careful with all types of forced induction turbo....blah blah blah...point and case....important crap here and a few links
beat me to saying anything!

N20 is the cheepest bang for your buck, and you can have a SC or Turbo and N20.

And yes, you can have a Nitrous Oxide Systems kit on your car, they do make many different types which will suit your needs.

Course....i'm a fan of venom kits myself....
__________________
My new RHD project!


Solid Crew (Circa 2002)
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-08-2004, 03:24 PM
Neutrino's Avatar
Neutrino Neutrino is offline
Yaya Master
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Neutrino
Re: Re: Re: Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

Quote:
Originally Posted by TerminalVelocity
beat me to saying anything!

N20 is the cheepest bang for your buck, and you can have a SC or Turbo and N20.

And yes, you can have a Nitrous Oxide Systems kit on your car, they do make many different types which will suit your needs.

Course....i'm a fan of venom kits myself....


LOL...when i first looked at my quote i was like WTF I did not say that. Good summary of my post though


Oh and i agree on the venom kits, pricy but they are about the best dry kits.
__________________

(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-09-2004, 12:05 AM
PearlGT PearlGT is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 441
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: NOS VS> SUPERCHARGER

yah superchargers give out incredible low end power but i'd have to say the best all around f/i apllication for many cars i've seen has been sequential turbos where its twin turbo, one small turbo to spool up quick at low end and one much bigger turbo to give insane high end power as well.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Racing > Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts