|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| COMPLETELY off-topic Talk about anything other than cars. But you can't be mad and angry in this forum! |
| View Poll Results: which is more important in a car; looks, sound, or preformance | |||
| Looks |
   
|
12 | 27.27% |
| Sound |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Preformance |
  
|
30 | 68.18% |
| ALL OF THE ABOVE |
  
|
2 | 4.55% |
| Voters: 44. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
07-31-2004, 03:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Although it is hard to classify a Skyline GTR as a sleeper I prefer to keep mine as stock looking as possible. Must be performance for me.
__________________
You don't own a Skyline, then don't cry to me about it! 1992 Silver R32 GTR tickled to 450hp. - Sold when I left NZ in 2004 Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. Never confuse kindess with weakness. AF user guidelines, Please remember to abide by them  
|
|
#17
07-31-2004, 04:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
Quote:
 Performance here too.
__________________
|
|
#18
07-31-2004, 04:44 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
performance, definately, i hope were beyond paying thousands of dollars for something that just looks pretty. But what about COMFORT. Its nice too.
|
|
#19
07-31-2004, 04:45 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
Quote:
I thought about re-badging it to a GTS but no one would buy it being N/A lol. Could do a GTS-4 badge lol
__________________
You don't own a Skyline, then don't cry to me about it! 1992 Silver R32 GTR tickled to 450hp. - Sold when I left NZ in 2004 Arguing on the Internet is like competing in the special olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. Never confuse kindess with weakness. AF user guidelines, Please remember to abide by them
|
|
#20
07-31-2004, 06:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
Quote:
Haha, thats funny... and so true. I would say performance and looks. I love the way some cars look but sometimes they are slow and don't perform well. Other times ill see a car and be like 'damn thats ugly' and then it starts drivin and im just like 'damn....'
__________________
_______________________ 2000 Chevy Silverado 1500 Standard Cab, Short Bed 4X4 Perfection is SOO hard to strive for.... especially when you're already there. 
|
|
#21
07-31-2004, 06:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
Seriously though, if you're not taking it to the track, who cares how fast it is. If I were to hook up my Maxima, it would be for looks and sound. It is as fast as I could ever need on the street, adding 100 hp would be useless; there is nowhere to use it except at the track.
Daily Driver: Looks, Sound Track Car: Performance
__________________
 "Don't have sex man. It leads to kissing and pretty soon you have to start talking to them." Steve Martin.
|
|
#22
07-31-2004, 07:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
Its all a matter of preferance. Personally, i dont think adding 100hp is ever useless. But like i said its all preferance, some ppl drive just to get from A to B, and some drive just for the ride. I love cars way too much to just make them look nice. They gotta perform.
|
|
#23
07-31-2004, 08:11 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
i'm one of the few people i know that actually enjoys driving...based on that, i gotta go with performance.
what's the point of looking fast if you can't back it up?
__________________
 Proud member of DAMM: Drunks Against Mad Mothers Quote:
|
|
#24
07-31-2004, 09:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
With Alfa Romeo's you get all of that- Drop dead gorgeous looks, orgasmic sound and awe-inspiring peformance. Too bad they are so high maintenence
 (Meh, what Italian isn't?)
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo  2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans
|
|
#25
08-01-2004, 01:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
Performance. Who the hell wants a car that's all flashy with bumpin tunes that runs like a damn golf cart? Rusted out El Camino with a 600 hp big block? NO PROBLEM!
|
|
#26
08-01-2004, 01:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
Definately performance. I would rather have a truck or a car that puts you back in your seat and makes your passanger curl up in the fetal position and chew their finger nails than a one that makes me look like a rich pretty boy. No pun intended.
|
|
#27
08-01-2004, 04:59 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
i prefer looks. it doesnt matter what kind of car it is, it should look nice... even if its a mid 80s Tercel.
__________________
04 SRT-4 03 Evo 96 Talon TSi AWD *dead* 93 Talon TSi AWD *sold* 85 300ZX Turbo 90 300zx Twin Turbo 82 Karen 04 little boy
|
|
#28
08-01-2004, 12:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
Performance. The car doesn't nessecerialy need to be fast, but if it can't at least double the recomended on/off ramp speed limit, I dont want to have anything to do with it.
|
|
#30
08-01-2004, 01:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Looks, Sound, or Preformance?
Quote:
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
