|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
|
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
know how much will this S15 SR20DET cost? let alone how hard will it be to find one? about 2 years ago when i was deciding what i want to do with the car, i searched everywhere, and i found that the S15 SR20DET would be nearly impossible to find, and the engine itself would cost close to 5000 alone. sorry not worth the money. even the S14 SR20DET is not all that great. i know a person with the S14 SR20DET which comes with a T28 turbo and variable valve timing, in his S14 that and supporting mods, i still beat him, and i was untuned at the time with less mods. trust me i read magazines alot and i know plenty of people with SR's in person ( not on the web ) so i would know more about it then you do. so how is a 2.4 liter goin to have less potential then a 2.0 liter?
sheesh i'm soo tired of listing these things but here we go again both engines have forged rods, both engines have forged crank ( KA's being stronger ) both engines have piston cooling oil squirter ( only turbo engines have these) the KA have a iron block which is stronger then a alumium one the KA have a better valve train ( direct cam on bucket style instead of the SR's rocker arm style ) you try to rev a SR too high the rocker arms will fly out, that is why they sell rocker arm stoppers that you put inside the valve cover. so how is a SR more potent then a KA? the tiny stock T25 ain't gonna give you real power anyways, not to mention the stock tiny ass 370cc injectors, or the small 2.5 inch mass air flow meter that maxes out at around 300hp. so for the SR20DET ( the older non S15 versions ) to hit over 300hp, you would need to upgrade the MAF to a 300ZX 3 inch version, upgrade the injectors to support more hp, ( which means you need a SAFC to tune ) and the most important of all you need to buy a larger turbo to give you more power then 300hp. you see the SR has plenty of limitations most of them i just listed. so lets see you spend around 4000 for a swap for a S13 redtop. that doens't include the FMIC or the boost controller to raise your boost to make decent power. and then after around 5000-6000 grand your making 300hp yahhh what a good bargain!!!! i spend around 3000 for my setup, granted i am also limited by the same things as the SR, such as the 370cc injectors that i gladly took from a SR, and the stock MAF tops out at around 300hp as well. but i'm only running 9 psi, and that whp i have is outdated i have done a few more tricks and i'm probrably making 250-260ish at the wheels. which is a quit a bit over 300hp ( more close to 320hp ) and the rebuild of my engine will cost around 2000, plus better fuel management ( 1000 tops ) and i spend 6000 for close to 500 hp. the SR can't touch that sorry. considering that the S15 SR alone cost close to 5000 and thats not even including install and your only goin to be making around 210 whp. don't make me laugh. P.S. you have been owned!!!
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
i really dont see why you guys type down a whole paper like if you were doing a report for skool, and then say "i owned you.."! is that supposed to make you look cool? i have alot of friends with SR powered 240's, i bet theyd be glad to own you at a track! |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
SR going to rule over mustang kakakka stupid big engine
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
Honestly guy I've seen plenty of MODDED 240sx around here get eatin up by 5.0stangs sorry to have to tell you that. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
please stick to the subject at hand Quote:
I would beg to differ on that. Alfa Romeo is grilling BMW on the european rancing series and they use FWD cars. however in this comparison I'll chose the 240SX
__________________
![]() (\__/) (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
there are quit a few 400-500whp KA24's. i have never heard of anyone needing to sleeve a KA. most 400-500whp SR20's uses a stroker kit to up the displacement to a 2.2 liter. why go thru all that trouble when you can have the larger displacement in the first place? and another thing i was stating facts with numbers and logic, your arguement is purely on opinion. i was defending the KA and is stating that the SR is even though a very good engine, it was quit overrated. you know nothing of the two engines yet you try to argue with facts. fine enjoy blowing your money away.
also KA's are quit good at autocrossing with its good low end torque. now for the race track, you can the same power out of a KA running less boost so its less stress on the engine, and the low end tq will help it in the corners. the boost will also come on sooner if i use the same size turbo for the SR. i am more of a drag racer/ high end highway racer. its not everyday that i can go up the LIME ROCK and race at a race course. that is why i choose to go with a T04B instead of a T3. so yes at a road course with my setup, a SR will eat me up with its better power delivery compared to my laggy T4.becuase i am not building my car for something that will barely ever do, and i highly doubt you will go road racing either if you had a SR. however on the highway where high end matters, then T4 will beat almost any stock turbo SR. and BTW the people who blow up KA's don't know shit about turbos. i've been running my KA for over a year and over 20K miles and its still fine with no smoke blowing out and i burn less oil then a brand new STI and EVO 8. so take that for reliablity. its idiots who don't knwo what da hell they're doing who blow up KA's. if the SR didn't come turbo from the factory, and you do the same shit to it like how some people turbo KA's, that shit will blow too. no matter how strong a engine is built if your knocking the shit out of it, it will freaking blow in a matter of minutes. i know a guy who also has a KA-T and he is on his 2nd engine and recently he blew out cylinder number 3 and had to get another rebuild. he is not very good with mechics nor have alot of experience to know whats really going on or how to trouble shoot. that is why i even admitted myself, if you don't know shit about turbo cars or how they run or how the ECU takes in data from the input and the outputs and the reaction of every conditions that would effect engine parameters. then don't bother turboin the KA because you will blow shit up. so for amatuers who wants the easy way out swap in a SR and spend more money. but for us who likes a challenge and who wants to be different and who wants to prove a point and blow any SR i see away for very little money pick a KA. by the end of this summer to the end of fall, i should be making over 400whp by investing less then 3.5K more. and once again the car will be daily driven. we are both nissan lovers, why are we even fighting over this? i have my believe you have your believe, i stated the facts, and the reasons. its up to you if you want to listen and atleast think realistically. yes a SR will beat me at a road course, but how often do i race at a autoX or a road course? so far i have never, not even once. i don't feel like waking up at 6, and waiting for tech inspection at 7:30 in the morning. however i have encoutered many highway races, and many drag races, and my KA setup served me well enough. saying your car is good at something that you do'nt do means nothing if you do'nt actually apply it. thats all i'm saying.
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
|
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
|
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
Quote:
The car I'm building is an older mustang restomodified with updated driveline and suspension for track use so that should tell you I'm not really a drag racing fan. |
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1992 Eclipse GS vs 92 240SX
come to mod '''nissan '''is the fastest car in the world. this is maximune modify on world cars.
2000 HKS Racing 180SX 0-60 in 1.2 second 0-100 mph 2.54 sec Quarter Mile: 7.72 sec @ 176 mph Type: Twin-Turbo Inline-6 Displacement: 2772 cc Horsepower: 1100 bhp @ 9000 rpm Torque: 759 lb-ft @ 6500 rpm 1994 Ford SVT 10.0L Boss Mustang Type: V8 Displacement: 9804 cc Horsepower: 855 bhp @ 6200 rpm Torque: 790 lb-ft @ 5200 rpm Redline: 7200 rpm Performance 0-60 mph: 1.9 sec 0-100 mph: 5.5 sec Quarter Mile: 10.55 sec @ 135 mph 2001 Corvette Twin-Turbo Type: Twin-Turbo V8 Displacement: 7007 cc Horsepower: 802 bhp @ 4600 rpm Torque: 866 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm Redline: 6500 rpm Performance 0-60 mph: 1.97 sec 0-100 mph: 4.33 sec Quarter Mile: 8.95 sec @ 153 mph Skidpad: 1.01g Top Speed: est 240 mph 1973 Porsche 917/30 Type: Twin-Turbo v12 Displacement: 5374 cc Horsepower: 1100 bhp @ 7800 rpm Torque: 820 lb-ft @ 6400 rpm 0-60 mph: 2.1 sec Top Speed: 238 mph 2001 Vipper 800TT Type: Twin-Turbo V10 Displacement: 7990 cc Horsepower: 833 bhp @ 5400 rpm Torque: 902 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm Redline: 6000 rpm Performance 0-60 mph: 2.4 sec 0-100 mph: 5.5 sec Quarter Mile: 9.99 sec @ 138.95 mph Skidpad: 1.06g Top Speed: 230 mph Braking, 60-0 mph: 110 ft Slalom Speed: 75.1 mph Toyota Supra Type: Twin-Turbo Inline-6 Displacement: 3210 cc Horsepower: 1200 bhp @ 7500 rpm Torque: 741 lb-ft @ 7400 rpm Top Speed: 249 mph Blitz Skyline r34 Type: Turbocharged Inline-6 Displacement: 2750 cc Horsepower: 850 bhp @ 9300 rpm Torque: 709 lb-ft @ 7500 rpm 0-60 mph: 3.0 sec Top Speed: 213 mph |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
another vote for the 240sx.
nice to see the ka-t getting some attenion.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|