-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 04-04-2004, 11:04 PM
DkShadow's Avatar
DkShadow DkShadow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

I dont see how the T/A would win. Ive seen Mach 1s click off 13.3 stock and 12.9s with just X-pipe and shifter. Unless Im missing something here...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-05-2004, 09:55 PM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Well lets look into what your missing

OK
96 LT1 WS6 Trans AM
Horsepower - 305
Torque - 335
0 - 60 - 5.3 -5.5
1/4 - 13.9 -14.1
Mods -
Catback Exhaust - 15 - 20 Horsepower- .2 -1/4
Headers - 30 Horsepower (stock headers on LT1's are very restrictive and always yield 30 + on the dyno) - .3 1/4
K&N CAI - 19 rear wheel horsepower (dyno proven)
- .2 1/4
Shift Kit I'm assuming transgo cause almost everything else is a waste of money at least - .2 1/4

New Horsepower rating - Min 369
New Torque - Min 350 +
1/4 13.0 - 13.2


03 Mustang Mach 1

Horsepower - 305
Torque- 320
0-60 5.3 -5.5
1/4 Your number 13.3 but most people state 13.6 +

Your right you are missing something
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-05-2004, 10:13 PM
DkShadow's Avatar
DkShadow DkShadow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Since when does KnN and Flows gain over 30hp??

Oh and I didnt read that it had headers... Hmmm... If thats the case then it should be a drivers race...

Oh and the mach 1 is underrated. It makes around 280 to the rears.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaLT1
Well lets look into what your missing

OK
96 LT1 WS6 Trans AM
Horsepower - 305
Torque - 335
0 - 60 - 5.3 -5.5
1/4 - 13.9 -14.1
Mods -
Catback Exhaust - 15 - 20 Horsepower- .2 -1/4
Headers - 30 Horsepower (stock headers on LT1's are very restrictive and always yield 30 + on the dyno) - .3 1/4
K&N CAI - 19 rear wheel horsepower (dyno proven)
- .2 1/4
Shift Kit I'm assuming transgo cause almost everything else is a waste of money at least - .2 1/4

New Horsepower rating - Min 369
New Torque - Min 350 +
1/4 13.0 - 13.2


03 Mustang Mach 1

Horsepower - 305
Torque- 320
0-60 5.3 -5.5
1/4 Your number 13.3 but most people state 13.6 +

Your right you are missing something
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-05-2004, 10:17 PM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

If you read you would see K&N intake which includes a less restrictive intake duct a 9 inch cone K&N filter that hangs under the front fender and yes it has been proven time and time again to yield 19 to the wheels which even if you calculate for drivetrain loss where do you get 30 from that number
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-05-2004, 10:24 PM
DkShadow's Avatar
DkShadow DkShadow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaLT1
If you read you would see K&N intake which includes a less restrictive intake duct a 9 inch cone K&N filter that hangs under the front fender and yes it has been proven time and time again to yield 19 to the wheels which even if you calculate for drivetrain loss where do you get 30 from that number
Hmm... Just to make sure... are we talking ricer intake or manifold? If its like the KnN PIFK, its been dyno proven to make 1-2 hp on most Stangs.


And... you said....

Catback Exhaust - 15 - 20 Horsepower - .2 -1/4
K&N CAI - 19 rear wheel horsepower (dyno proven) - .2 1/4



So add em up...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-05-2004, 10:27 PM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

The LT1 CAI which is the also referred to as the K&N intake is far more productive on LT1's do some research , one way GM detuned the F-body's to have less horse was with the restrictive intake
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-05-2004, 10:29 PM
DkShadow's Avatar
DkShadow DkShadow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaLT1
The LT1 CAI which is the also referred to as the K&N intake is far more productive on LT1's do some research , one way GM detuned the F-body's to have less horse was with the restrictive intake
Why would I reasearch mods on a car that I dont own?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-05-2004, 10:30 PM
FormulaLT1's Avatar
FormulaLT1 FormulaLT1 is offline
Fight the powwa!!!
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,521
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to FormulaLT1 Send a message via MSN to FormulaLT1 Send a message via Yahoo to FormulaLT1
Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Because if your going to give biased info you should at least have some type of facts to back it up
__________________
RIP Hypsi - I just want to express I will never be the same after having lost such a good friend. You meant alot to me and I feel I am a better person for having known you. Til the day we meet again my friend you will always be in my heart.


Mods: Weight reduction (I don't wear underwear)
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-05-2004, 10:33 PM
hungryJonJon's Avatar
hungryJonJon hungryJonJon is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace$nyper
I think that it would be the Mach 1 by a bit.
Agree
__________________
VIDEO of 13.706s with 1.9s 60' with ONLY Pro 5.0 and C&L MAF
Steeda Underdrive Pulleys, Magnaflow catted X and Magnapacks, C&L MAF and Intake Plenum, Accufab 75mm Throttle Body
AFS Wheels 2003 Cobra 17x9's 275/40's, Pro3i LCA's, grille delete, 20% tint, 2001+ hood scoop, sequential tail lights, Bullit pedals, Pro 5.0.
Alpine 12" Type R, Alpine MRD-M300, Kenwood 7019.
Exhaust sound clip
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-06-2004, 02:01 AM
DkShadow's Avatar
DkShadow DkShadow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FormulaLT1
Because if your going to give biased info you should at least have some type of facts to back it up
What biased info? The info where I dont believe that a CAI gives you 19rwhp or a gain of 20+ on a catback? It just doesnt add up to me. Obviously different cars react to different mods but Ive never heard of a 19rwhp gain from a CAI!

Threadstarter what kind of midpipe is the LT1 using? Long tubes or Shorty headers?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-06-2004, 02:05 AM
DkShadow's Avatar
DkShadow DkShadow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

F*ck it... just race. Who gives a shit about other peoples opinion. Get off your lazy ass and race. E-Racing is stupid and not everything happens like its on paper. So GO RACE!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-06-2004, 02:07 AM
hungryJonJon's Avatar
hungryJonJon hungryJonJon is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 36
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Mach 1 has more HP and better gearing. it should win unless the driver is horrible.
__________________
VIDEO of 13.706s with 1.9s 60' with ONLY Pro 5.0 and C&L MAF
Steeda Underdrive Pulleys, Magnaflow catted X and Magnapacks, C&L MAF and Intake Plenum, Accufab 75mm Throttle Body
AFS Wheels 2003 Cobra 17x9's 275/40's, Pro3i LCA's, grille delete, 20% tint, 2001+ hood scoop, sequential tail lights, Bullit pedals, Pro 5.0.
Alpine 12" Type R, Alpine MRD-M300, Kenwood 7019.
Exhaust sound clip
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-06-2004, 02:15 AM
GTStang's Avatar
GTStang GTStang is offline
Stang Guy
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTStang
All those HP and ET gains I see are very optomistic IMO.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world
has lost one of the truly wonderful people...

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-06-2004, 02:24 AM
DkShadow's Avatar
DkShadow DkShadow is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 991
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTStang
All those HP and ET gains I see are very optomistic IMO.
Which is why I made this post

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...6&postcount=26


Theres no point in these threads, itll just give different opinions. Just go and race and post results.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-06-2004, 11:43 AM
91StangLX 91StangLX is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking Re: Re: mach1 or lt1 trans am?

Quote:
Originally Posted by z28 boy
With headers and everything? I don't know i guess i am just biest to the f-body.
Yep I had an F-body once..... Then I got a job!!! :-)~

For Real though, I think the Mach 1 would come out a little short on this race... If the Trans has all the mods stated and the Mach 1 was stock that is... Now if the Mach 1 had simular mods... It would be a whole different story...

Those Trans am are fast I ran against one at my last track outing and had my back side handed me... I ran 12.23 and he ran 11.88...
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts