best bang for the buck cars under 25,000

[Polygon]

Originally Posted by OoNismoO

those srt-4s are probably having problems cause of how hard its being drivin, i mean think about the type of people who would buy them, they probably bought it for speed, and they probably drive them pretty hard. also, its been out long enough that i would expect some of them to start having problems, not all of them are gonna be perfect, even cars, or companies known for good reliability will get problems this early.

Yeah, Chrysler needs to educate customers on how to take care of a turbo-charged car.

[Neutrino]

Oh btw if anyone doubts the srt-4 i would like to point out this article

http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/pr...0scc_projneon/

if anything this engine is overenginered


oh and btw its got the smoothest pull of any car that i've driven...very similar with the RX8's but way more powerful

[BLU CIVIC]

funny how every time a thread include or makes mention of the neon srt-4.....we first have people critizing it then everyone defending it, then everyone telling about the past of dodge

[Neutrino]

Originally Posted by BLU CIVIC

funny how every time a thread include or makes mention of the neon srt-4.....we first have people critizing it then everyone defending it, then everyone telling about the past of dodge

that is true...it happens everytime....


the thing is that people keep bashing it whitout bothering to do any reaseach

this is exacly why SCC did that article i posted...they were sick and tired of hate mail regarding the srt4

quote from the article:
"But power isn't enough to satisfy some of you. Since our first test of the car, we've received approximately 6,000 letters saying exactly the same thing: "Sure the SRT-4 is fast, but it's still a Neon. It'll break down before the end of the quarter mile, blah blah blah..."

this is why we are defending it...people bash it based on prejudices and don't bother to make proper research

i really hate it when people don't give credit were credit is due

fine you don't like it don't buy it....but that doesn't make it a POS

[F23A4Racer750IL]

Originally Posted by Polygon

Yeah, Chrysler needs to educate customers on how to take care of a turbo-charged car.

isnt it a mitsu turbo?

[Neutrino]

Originally Posted by F23A4Racer750IL

isnt it a mitsu turbo?

yeah

[F23A4Racer750IL]

yeah do u mind answering the question. o i guess that was a dum question. i saw wat u said in my email notifaction "and that bad why". did i say that was a bad thing. and i knew that DSM made engines for damiler-chrysler cars. it was just a simple question.

[Neutrino]

Originally Posted by F23A4Racer750IL

yeah do u mind answering the question. o i guess that was a dum question. i saw wat u said in my email notifaction "and that bad why". did i say that was a bad thing. and i knew that DSM made engines for damiler-chrysler cars. it was just a simple question.

weird....yeah at the begining i misunderstood your post....and i realised it was just a question so i edited the post....


so completely disregard what i posted originally....i realised imediatelly that you did not mean that as a bad thing and i edited the post...i did not even realise that the email notification had the original reply since i don't use email notification myself

[F23A4Racer750IL]

aight its cool.