-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Malibu
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-19-2022, 03:20 PM
tomj76 tomj76 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 865
Thanks: 3
Thanked 64 Times in 63 Posts
2022 GM Malibu Not a Viable Option

Just looked at the 2022 Malibu. The engine is 1.5L Turbo. No thanks. They have just "marketed" themselves out of my choices.


My dad had a '76 Malibu Classic. It came with a 250 CI (4.1 L) inline 6 engine. That car was HUGE! I think two of the 2022 model could fit inside the footprint of the 1976 model.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-19-2022, 09:30 PM
Blue Bowtie's Avatar
Blue Bowtie Blue Bowtie is offline
Registered Offender
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,562
Thanks: 8
Thanked 346 Times in 341 Posts
Re: 2022 GM Malibu Not a Viable Option

The '76 G-bodies were actually not "huge" but were a lot bigger than their current contemporaries. A '76 B-body was actually huge. A '76 Caprice 2-door had a quarter panel that was 11 feet long. The door alone was almost 6 feet.

I believe the comparable D bodies were even slightly larger. A '74-76 Buick Electra, Olds Ninety Eight, or Sedan de Ville had a curb weight that rivals most "standard" pickups today, at just under 5,300 curb weight. 130" wheelbase, 80" wide, 235" long, and that was with 27G of fuel versus the option 48G on a modern F-250.

The station wagons were even more massive. It was a different philosophy.
__________________
Permanent seat assignment on the Group W bench...
Automotive Forums Survival Guide
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-20-2022, 04:36 AM
wpbharry wpbharry is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 409
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 2022 GM Malibu Not a Viable Option

The 1.5L Turbo has been in the Malibu since model year 2016 and you'll find it in the Equinox as well. I have a similar engine in my Ford Fusion and it's not bad. My BIG problem with the Malibu, and why I didn't buy one, is the lack of a start/stop off switch. Other GM products have one but not the Bu.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-26-2022, 09:08 AM
tomj76 tomj76 is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 865
Thanks: 3
Thanked 64 Times in 63 Posts
Re: 2022 GM Malibu Not a Viable Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Bowtie View Post
A '76 B-body was actually huge. A '76 Caprice 2-door had a quarter panel that was 11 feet long. The door alone was almost 6 feet.
My dad's 'Classic' was a coupe and it also had very large doors, I'd guess 5-6 ft long. He bought it with a manual transmission (on the column) because it was either during or just after the oil embargo and the price of gasoline had increased so much. The hood seemed to go on forever.



As far as the new Malibu, I am not a fan of turbo charged engines for a daily driver. I see turbo as a very expensive added failure point. Another smaller negative is the issue of turbo lag in engine output response.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tomj76 For This Useful Post:
Tom_SF (12-14-2022)
  #5  
Old 01-26-2022, 09:34 AM
maxwedge maxwedge is online now
A990 racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 17,052
Thanks: 26
Thanked 383 Times in 374 Posts
Re: 2022 GM Malibu Not a Viable Option

My wife's 2021. Equinox 1.5 turbo is surprisingly responsive, the smaller turbo spools pretty quickly. Given a choice I would have preferred a non turbo engine. Gotta use a pretty specific Dexos 2 oil. Been averaging about 27mpg, it hasn't reached 32 degrees here in a month!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-27-2022, 05:21 AM
wpbharry wpbharry is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 409
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: 2022 GM Malibu Not a Viable Option

Quote:
Originally Posted by maxwedge View Post
My wife's 2021. Equinox 1.5 turbo is surprisingly responsive, the smaller turbo spools pretty quickly. Given a choice I would have preferred a non turbo engine. Gotta use a pretty specific Dexos 2 oil. Been averaging about 27mpg, it hasn't reached 32 degrees here in a month!
My Fusion with the 1.5L is very responsive as well. Considering an Equinox to replace it if the chip shortage ever goes away. I don't mind the higher oil change prices, but that $300 battery because of stop/start was an eye-opener.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Malibu


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts