Missouri takes levee battle to U.S. Supreme Court

[blazee]

http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/05/01/mis...ach/index.html

(CNN) -- Missouri on Sunday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to halt a plan to intentionally breach a levee on the rain-swollen Mississippi River, flooding Missouri farmland in an effort to save an Illinois town.


Earlier, Missouri filed a federal suit to block the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from following through on its plan to breach the Birds Point-New Madrid levee. A federal judge on Friday ruled against Missouri, saying a 1928 law permits the breach of the levee to ease pressure on the river.


Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster filed an application for an injunction to the high court on Sunday. It was assigned to Justice Samuel Alito, according to the U.S. Supreme Court's website.


The Corps of Engineers says the action is necessary to save the town of Cairo, Illinois, although it will flood rural Missouri farm communities. "I know that the price being paid is high," said Maj. Gen. Michael Walsh on Saturday.

[blazee]

Missouri properly prepared for such a disaster, Illinois didn't. So, the government is going to destroy Missouri's protection to help Illinois. Does this seem wrong to anyone else?

It kind of reminds you of the fable about the Grasshopper and the Ants... except in this case the government steps in and takes all the food from the ants and gives it to the grasshopper.

[speediva]

Wow, I have missed a lot in the news lately!

I can't fathom why this is even in consideration. Like you said, Missouri prepared and Illinois didn't. It's not that I want to see a city hurt by flooding (as today is the 1-year anniversary of the Nashville flood) but why hurt innocent farmers who don't make nearly enough as it is? Time to get out sandbags, IL - leave other states out of YOUR mess.