|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Which one to buy??? | |||
| 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo. VIII(turbo 2.0l I4, 275 hp, 0~60: app. 4.9s, AWD |
|
12 | 44.44% |
| 2003 Nissan 350z(3.5l V6, 287hp, 0~60:5.4s, RWD) |
|
5 | 18.52% |
| 2004 Toyota Supra( 3.5l V6, 280hp~300hp, RWD) |
|
2 | 7.41% |
| 2004 Subaru Impreza WRX Sti(turbo 2.2l H4, 280hp, 0~60:5.1sec, AWD) |
|
8 | 29.63% |
| Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which one to buy??
Sorry!!!I forgot to post polls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:frog:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Isn't this forum a little bit on the biased side to put that poll up and get good feedback?
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
The '04 STi is gonna be 2.2l? WTF? Either that's a typo, WRC regulations are changing, or Subaru isn't going to be using the Impreza STi as their flagship rally car, eh? Or perhaps I'm mistaken?
__________________
I swarm with the bees and diseases, and even if your DJ was Jesus you could never f*ck with these kids. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ok, WRX is 2L unless its been stroked, or 2.5L in the new Sti that will be US only.
Supra is an inline 6 cylinder 3L, not 3.5L v6. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
ok, i just read that u stated 2004 supra, where did u get those stats from? I would be interested to see info about the new supra.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
the new supra will be far more then 280bhp. more like 400bhp
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
I haven't even heard a peep about a new Supra, so I am completely disregarding it. I am basing my opinion completely off of stock for stock.
My vote goes to the Evo because it has, by far; better styling IMO, plus it has an air bag in a damn Momo wheel, which is freaking cool. While the 350Z has great styling, it is too expensive for my taste, no turbo, and RWD. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hmmm... It really depends on what you are looking for. You can split these 4 cars up into 2 categories: The 350Z and the Supra in one, and the Lancer and WRX in the other. I love the 350Z and I'm not a huge fan of Supras. And I love WRXs but I'm not a huge fan of EVOs. I don't know, I would need to see some stats. If you live in a place where it snows, I would think you want an AWD car. But if you live in a place that gets a lot of nice weather.... I don't know which is better between the Supra and the 350Z.... I need stats.
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
out of those, i'm gonna have to go with the 350z just on personal taste. not a fan of the looks of either the mitsubishi or subaru even if their performance makes up for it. where those two look too boy-racerish for me with big wings and all that body clad work, the 350z is just something i'd rather be in. that's just my taste.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
I see what you are saying, and I think the 350Z mau be the nicest and sportiest looking out of these cars. But you have to consider use. Would you buy a 2-wheel drive sports car if you lived in an area that got a lot of snow?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think this poll is bias against front wheel drive cars. J/k :cwn27: I will take the STI until a aftermarket company decides to hook up the lancer, if any aftermarket company is listening out there.
__________________
Last edited by dolla_bill0913; 02-18-2003 at 04:23 PM. |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
the new sti has 300 hp and 300 tq. I'd still take the z though. i'm nissan biased. if you had put 300zx TT it'd have gotten my vote over a supra.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|