-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee
Register FAQ Community
'88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee Partnership with: LadyNRedSi.com
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #16  
Old 01-15-2004, 12:22 PM
nemo_wolf's Avatar
nemo_wolf nemo_wolf is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to nemo_wolf Send a message via MSN to nemo_wolf Send a message via Yahoo to nemo_wolf
Re: Re: Re: Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

Quote:
Originally Posted by riceriderjade
hhaha, i'm serious, take a crx, tune it to be incredibly fuel efficent

so am i ... only i have a hatch but id be willing to try some stuff ...
__________________
AF Bay Area Crew
91 civic LX sedan : Dec. 3rd 01 - Dec. 9th 02
88 civic DX hatch : Jan 14th 03 - Oct 05
96 Zamboni Model 552 : done working there
00 Civic EX coupe : Oct 05 - Sept 2010
11 Scion xB : Sept 2010 - Present
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-15-2004, 03:42 PM
alexdog69's Avatar
alexdog69 alexdog69 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

well... u should be able to get a mileage increase just going to a taller tire... as it will make your gearing taller... slower acceleration but lower RPM for a given speed...

however... i dont know how much extra MPG you can expect squeeze out of a honda like ours... depending on what type of engine you have....

the reason why i say this is that there is a page that probably many of you have seen..describing the ZC/Si hybrid trans...and the guy in question ended up trying something like 3 different 5th gears...and he put some miser gear in for 5th... said the gap between 4th and 5th sucked...it dropped his RPMs way too much... and (here is the kicker)... his MPG didnt change worth shit....

u can always swap in a HF drive train he he ... it seems that honda had to make some pretty drastic changes in order to squeeze out that insane mpg figure... gearing... mpfi with a really crappy ass cam to match the gearing.. and a 8V head... and its probably tuned to run pretty lean...

if you drive in a conservative manner... somewhere in the neighborhood of ~35 mpg should be very easy on almost any of our cars...

does anyone really need much more so bad that its worth killing the performance of the car ?

oh well..anyways..enough speculation...the HF does prove however that if you do some somewhat drastic tweaks that insane MPG is very possible.....

by the way... if im not mistaken, the name sake of the Civic is the old no longer used CVCC engine design... aka "Compound Vortex Controlled Combustion"... aka charge stratification....
where the main intake valve would let in the regular fuel mixture...which was set up to be extremely lean... so lean that the car wouldnt run properly on it...but there was a significantly smaller valve located as such that a small portion of rich mixture could be placed near the spark plug.... giving an uneven distribution of atomized fuel ... allowing it to ignite the rich mixture around the spark plug and burn off the rest of the surrounding lean mixture... causing the car to run normally despite the otherwise too lean mixture... producing lower emissions and much higher gas mileage....
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-15-2004, 03:43 PM
alexdog69's Avatar
alexdog69 alexdog69 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 146
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

and by the way the late 70s early 80s CVCC engines managed to run very low emissions WITHOUT a catalytic converter... due to this clever design by Honda...

Some of the Honda engineers sure are geniuses...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-10-2009, 10:27 PM
jhman2002 jhman2002 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

I just got the honda crx hf and tracked a trip of 191 miles from wilmington nc to graham nc and put in 2.754 gallons which meant that i got about 68 mpg. granted i was driving 60-65. but on average if i go 70 then i only get the claimed 50 mpg
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-13-2009, 08:28 PM
BLU CIVIC's Avatar
BLU CIVIC BLU CIVIC is offline
調整器
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,253
Thanks: 11
Thanked 44 Times in 38 Posts
Send a message via MSN to BLU CIVIC Send a message via Yahoo to BLU CIVIC
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

it's possible with a conservative driver


btw...last post was over 5 years ago
__________________
The name's Adrian
1990 Civic HB Si - 265.7whp/223tq @9.2psi. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills
1991 Civic Sedan DX - 296.3whp/230tq @1bar. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills
1991 Civic Sedan DX - 185.8whp/139tq. Tuned on NepTune by J.Mills
2006 G35 Coupe 6MT - Stock
2011 CR-Z - Stock
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-06-2009, 01:14 AM
n_i_c_k n_i_c_k is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 27
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

not bogus at all. neutral as often as possible, keep it at 2000 rpm, don't idle.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-06-2009, 08:19 PM
Tony's Avatar
Tony Tony is offline
TLD Member #1
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,860
Thanks: 2
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Tony
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

Dead thread
__________________
Tony


91 Civic Sedan DX - Stock 287k Miles
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-25-2009, 11:33 PM
FrodoGT's Avatar
FrodoGT FrodoGT is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

Aww man, I was all ready to blow this out of the water with epa mpg figures and ecomodder shtuff...


Oh btw, HAI from never never land! Been a long ass time.
__________________
Cheap, Fast, Reliable..Pick two

Current project:
Rio Red 91 hatch.
A6/Z6 build, Hondata S300, Tokico illumina/Ground Control.

"I'd rather run 12's on steelies than 15's on rotas."
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-18-2009, 11:55 PM
Christ Christ is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,455
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Christ Send a message via Yahoo to Christ
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrodoGT View Post
Aww man, I was all ready to blow this out of the water with epa mpg figures and ecomodder shtuff...


Oh btw, HAI from never never land! Been a long ass time.
Have you actually registered on EM? I haven't seen your nick on there...

I'm the asshole trying to break 30 MPG in a Caravan lol. (Same SN there and here.)
__________________
Honda-free since early 2009.

Current ride: 1996 Ford F150 4.9L (300ci) 5MT 4x4. Rednecks will win.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-09-2009, 10:30 PM
302NOVA 302NOVA is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 12
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: CRX HF 65 MPG: Bogus?

All of my five CRX-HF's got 50 miles per gallon with good tires and a good tune free running breaks. One summer my 1989 HF got in the upper fifties average I think the oxygen sensor was reading wrong and giving me great gas mileage. If the car is in perfect condition the right good tires not new no drag or problems I believe with the right computer chip modes the Hf will get 65 Miles per gallon under perfect conditions. The car is the best gas mileage car ever made don't laugh at it love it we need Honda to build them again for us I would buy a new one in a heart beat I've driven my five close to 800,000 miles total combined miles. They are for real!! I have enough parts to keep mine going for a long time!!
__________________
I have a 98 Plymouth voyager 91 Honda civic 83 and 94 Chevy diesel van 71 Monte with a trophy I got at super Chevy Sunday 68 ford 88 CRX HF. I'm from Muskegon Michigan! I'm a state certified mechanic and I have worked on all kinds of cars and trucks.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Honda > Civic | CRX > '88 - '91 Civic | CRX | Wagon | Shuttlee


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts