Dems seek end of free speech?!?

[BNaylor]

This whole issue is petty and nonsense anyways.

You can clearly see how dumb the liberals/demos are they actually believe Limbaugh is the face of or represents the Republican Party and its beliefs. Far from the truth. Just a stupid childish game of cat & mouse.

[03cavPA]

It's all about deflection and distraction. While they've got people focused on Rush, they'll do some end runs around other things they don't want people to notice.

Both sides do it.

[drunken monkey]

Originally Posted by BNaylor

This whole issue is petty and nonsense anyways.

You can clearly see how dumb the liberals/demos are they actually believe Limbaugh is the face of or represents the Republican Party and its beliefs. Far from the truth. Just a stupid childish game of cat & mouse.

Perhaps it is more indicative of what those individuals in question think of the general public.
Incidentally, what are (the general) views on Limbaugh?

[BNaylor]

Originally Posted by drunken monkey

Incidentally, what are (the general) views on Limbaugh?

Personally I can't stand the guy and definitely do not listen to him. IMO he gives Conservatives/Republicans a bad name. And in the process he is probably laughing all the way to the bank. He is more like an entertainer.

[thegladhatter]

On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, just minutes before learning of the terrorist attacks on America, Democratic strategist James Carville was hoping for President Bush to fail, telling a group of Washington reporters: "I certainly hope he doesn't succeed."

Limbaugh says ANYTHING the liberals don't like they get their panties in a wad.

[blazee]

Originally Posted by garthlaidher

BUT.... the liberals run TV and radio.

What would give you that idea?

[drunken monkey]

On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, just minutes before learning of the terrorist attacks on America, Democratic strategist James Carville was hoping for President Bush to fail, telling a group of Washington reporters: "I certainly hope he doesn't succeed."

Originally Posted by bagwanshrirashnish

Limbaugh says ANYTHING the liberals don't like they get their panties in a wad.

But what was said was then withheld by the person who said it, who also convinced those reporters to not publish it.
You are using that as an example of double standard but you seem to fail to notice that in that example, Carville censored himself.

[thegladhatter]

The idea being that NO ONE should EVER wish for the failure of the president. (so says the liberals) Yet MANY hoped for Bush's failure openly.

[drunken monkey]

why would you want your President to fail?

[BNaylor]

Personally I have no desire to see Obama the man himself fail. The fact that he got elected is a benchmark in history. Just his liberal agenda. There is a difference you know.

[drunken monkey]

That's kinda what I'm getting at.

[thegladhatter]

If BHO continues to push his marxist agenda....I hope he fails miserably!

[drunken monkey]

what's wrong with Marxism?

[blazee]

Originally Posted by drunken monkey

why would you want your President to fail?

Well, I don't know how well it comes across on BBC, but America is really divided. There are several parts. The 2 most popular are the liberals and conservatives. 3 and way down the list are people that are in the middle and not crazy like the other two. There are several other as well. Liberals want to be fuck ups and have the government take care of them in every way possible. Conservatives believe in an invisible man in the clouds and want to make everyone follow what they think he wants, except love thy neighbor because they don't want to help anyone. Then the 3rd are those that believe in intelligence, personal freedom, along with personal responsibility... those that don't want to be controlled by the religious/moral beliefs of others, or want to have to support those that refuse to contribute to society or take responsibility for themselves.

A president gets elected by catering to the sheep of one of the two main divisions of America. Because of that, there are a lot of people that don't agree with him or his policies. If someone was in control of the U.K. that wished to take everything that you worked for away and give it to someone else, or to spend the future earnings of your children/grandchildren before they were even old enough to work... would you want them to succeed or would you want their BS to fail and reality to win out?

[HotZ28]

Originally Posted by blazee

Then the 3rd are those that believe in intelligence, personal freedom, along with personal responsibility... those that don't want to be controlled by the religious/moral beliefs of others,

Most human beings are intelligent creatures who tend to have some spiritual inclinations that cannot be determined by material means alone. Marxism is simply a system of socialism, with which the overriding feature is public (government) ownership as the means of production, distribution, and exchange. Communism evolves from socialism as a result of this so-called progression: the socialist slogan is; “From each according to his ability, to each according to his work.” The communist slogan varies slightly and with; “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.” So, as a prerequisite to achieve either of the aforementioned radical agendas, you must first have a "redistribution of wealth."