-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-18-2002, 06:05 PM
ademarco6 ademarco6 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
3SGTE, 13B, 4G63 etc. which is better?

Hello,
I am currently researching 91-95 toyota mr2 (3sgte), 93-95 mazda rx-7 (13b), and 97-99 mitsubishi eclipse gsx (4G63). I am wondering which one is more reliable, best bang for the buck, easily modified to run with s2k's and maybe some v8's around (300hp) be a 13sec. 1/4 car. I know the eclipse has crankwalk issues and rx-7 and mr2 have detonation problems from heat. I really like rwd, awd cars. I know the rx-7 is probably the best bang for the buck and needs the most maintenance since it burns so much oil. But I prefer the styling of the mr2 which looks similar to a ferrari. The eclipse also has nice styling with silvia style headlights and has the awd capability which makes it heavier than the other two cars. I'm just wondering which one would be the best car to buy for someone on a budget that is low maintenance and reliable. I know that the mr2 will probably on top of the list and then the eclipse and rx-7 being the most maintenance. But with all turbo engines that is expected. Also how much would replacement/rebuild engines, transmission cost for these 3 cars. I'm sorry if I'm asking too much, but what I really want to know is which one would you get and why and any other cars that might be better to consider? I'm up for any suggestions. Thanks for taking your time to read/respond to my post.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2002, 11:56 AM
NISSANSPDR's Avatar
NISSANSPDR NISSANSPDR is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to NISSANSPDR
I gotta give it to the MR2 Turbo...the 3rd Gen RX7 would get it but it has reliability issues...mainly the constant rebuilds which loom in the horizon or around the corner if you cannot PROPERLY maintain them.

The 2nd Gen GSX's are notorious for crankwalk and other drivetrain problems...the 1st Gen's were less problematic and could handle more power on stock internals, not to mention that they were lighter.

MR2's can handle up to around 400HP on stock internals so go have fun...
__________________
Yours truly,
Gabriel


Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2002, 05:50 PM
Fliquer Fliquer is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 930
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Fliquer
The 1st gen turbo eclipse engines had huge potential and were very cheap to modify. Usually when someone wants to build a cheap 10-second car, they look to those eclipses (and the early talon tsi's).
__________________
Isitcontagious.com
'92 S13 coupe
KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs
Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe
Cone Filter
Next up: LSD

RIP #05
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts