-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-17-2002, 03:05 PM
smoke smoke is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question supra TT vs NSX

Who woild win between a sock 6-speed supra TT and a stock 5 or 6-speed NSX?
  #2  
Old 08-17-2002, 06:34 PM
BluStori BluStori is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 125
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
NSX is a great car but too overpriced...
It would be close if they were both stock, but Supra is the better car for your money and spend leftovers on upgrades cuz u can do soo many things to a Supra

Y are u comparing $80,000 car to a $30,000+ car anywayz!?!?!?

BTW stock NSX are slow -_-
  #3  
Old 08-17-2002, 09:26 PM
Jay! Jay! is offline
Horizontally Opposed
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 16,856
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Jay! Send a message via Yahoo to Jay!
Car comparison threads go in the car comparison forum.

Now, what do you mean by 'win?'

I, personally, would take any stock NSX over any 'sock' Supra, period.
__________________
Hierarchy of Subaru:
Brat > Coupes > Wagons > Sedans > Baja
(Click to see mine!)
  #4  
Old 08-21-2002, 11:59 AM
NISSANSPDR's Avatar
NISSANSPDR NISSANSPDR is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,906
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to NISSANSPDR
MKIV Supra TT anyday...the car just goes on the highway like a bat out of hell and the motor can hanlde up to around 600-650hp on stock internals...

The NSX is VERY much overpriced...the only thing it has on the Supra is the slightly better looks and the handling...but the handling part is not by that much.

Bottom line...w/all the money you saved I'd pick up a MKIV and modify it to hell
__________________
Yours truly,
Gabriel


  #5  
Old 08-21-2002, 02:52 PM
YogsVR4's Avatar
YogsVR4 YogsVR4 is offline
Funding the welfare state
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 17,795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to YogsVR4
I'd rather have the NSX, but the Supra TT certainly has the capability to beat one in a race.













__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm)
  #6  
Old 08-21-2002, 03:13 PM
Polygon's Avatar
Polygon Polygon is offline
The Red Baron
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,823
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Polygon Send a message via Skype™ to Polygon
Bah, I can't stand the NSX. I don't see why people like them so much. They cost WAY more than they are worth, hell you can buy a Viper or an imported moterex Skyline for the price of an NSX. The Supra will give you much more bang for your buck. Shit the NSX has less torque than my car.
  #7  
Old 08-21-2002, 04:15 PM
YogsVR4's Avatar
YogsVR4 YogsVR4 is offline
Funding the welfare state
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 17,795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to YogsVR4
Quote:
Originally posted by Polygon
Bah, I can't stand the NSX. I don't see why people like them so much. They cost WAY more than they are worth, hell you can buy a Viper or an imported moterex Skyline for the price of an NSX. The Supra will give you much more bang for your buck. Shit the NSX has less torque than my car.
I would much rather have a Viper as well, but between the two, I'd rather have the NSX. The Supra looks like shit (to me). I already have a couple cars that are everything and more then a Supra is. (please, no one respond with the tired old mod this and mod that horseshit and I dont mean you Polygon)

As usual, it all comes down to taste.













__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm)
  #8  
Old 08-22-2002, 02:21 PM
Whitey001 Whitey001 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 122
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Supre is a way better car stock than a NSX
  #9  
Old 08-22-2002, 05:40 PM
Fliquer Fliquer is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 930
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Fliquer
The NSX will whip a Supra's tail on a roadcourse (supras weigh a LOT, 300 lbs more than a vette!). They are nearly identical in straight-line speed.
__________________
Isitcontagious.com
'92 S13 coupe
KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs
Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe
Cone Filter
Next up: LSD

RIP #05
  #10  
Old 09-09-2002, 07:57 PM
Cyprus106 Cyprus106 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,527
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Cyprus106
i didnt know they made sock supras. must be one of those 'only made in japan' cars... except its a toyota. so i guess that would make it REALLY rare.
  #11  
Old 09-11-2002, 07:38 PM
del del is offline
móddə rąytər
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
i'd rather have an nsx, but i'd rather pay for a supra tt. mid-engine RWD, aluminum frame and lightweight. but then you have that price tag. on the other hand you have a twin turbocharged RWD supra, near the performance of the nsx at thousands less.
  #12  
Old 09-14-2002, 02:34 PM
THE4TH's Avatar
THE4TH THE4TH is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to THE4TH
i would also rather have the NSX, but there is nothing wrong with the supra tt.. it's on my 'to do' list as well..
__________________
S2000
  #13  
Old 09-14-2002, 11:46 PM
Dented200sx Dented200sx is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
THe STOCK NSX would take the STOCK Supra by almost 2 car lengths at the green light, then the turbos would kick in and the Supra would take the 1/4 mile by 3 car lengths! Don't ask, but you see some funny stuff late friday and satuday nights. NSX to much price, not enough car. Supra, too much potenial, too much price, way too much car!

LOOKS, NSX by far

WHICH TO CHOSE
TOM"S Castrol Supra or RAYBRIG NSX damn life is hard!!!
__________________
Been arond the world... seen a lot of cars in a lot of situations, drag, mountains, tracks, streets... i've learned 2 things, "No replacement for displacement" and, "the driver wins races, not the car" !!!
  #14  
Old 09-15-2002, 11:43 AM
gang$tarr's Avatar
gang$tarr gang$tarr is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,677
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Supra's a much better car imo
The NSX just doesnt have all the potential, the faster NSXs need the comptech supercharger to get quicker and that still only generates power under 500hp, its hard to find an NSX with more power than that. While the Supra can attain the same power by just going BPU with 2-3k of mods, that will get the Supra into 12s 1/4 mile and 400+rwhp

It comes down to opinion though, if you'd rather drive a car that looks more exotic but doesnt perform as well as it should than the NSX is for you. If you want a car that responds very well to mods, has alot of potential and costs less, than the Supra is for you.
__________________
R.I.P. Lamont Coleman a.k.a. Big L -- 1975-1999
"Your ice don't shine an your chain hollow/ why you front in clubs for hours wit tha same bottle/ takin midget sips/ I run wit the richest clicks/ Tap the thickest chicks/ plus drop the slickest hits/ you know nothin about L/ so don't doubt L/ what's this muthafuckin rap game wit out L/ Yo that's like jewels wit out ice/ that's like china wit out rice/ or the holy bible wit out christ/ tha bulls wit out mike/ crack heads wit out pipes/ or hockey games wit out fights/ don't touch the mic if you aint able to spit/ flamboyant is tha label i'm wit.. muthafucka.... Big L"
  #15  
Old 09-16-2002, 12:23 PM
YogsVR4's Avatar
YogsVR4 YogsVR4 is offline
Funding the welfare state
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 17,795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to YogsVR4
Quote:
Originally posted by gang$tarr
The Supra's a much better car imo
The NSX just doesnt have all the potential, the faster NSXs need the comptech supercharger to get quicker and that still only generates power under 500hp, its hard to find an NSX with more power than that. While the Supra can attain the same power by just going BPU with 2-3k of mods, that will get the Supra into 12s 1/4 mile and 400+rwhp

It comes down to opinion though, if you'd rather drive a car that looks more exotic but doesnt perform as well as it should than the NSX is for you. If you want a car that responds very well to mods, has alot of potential and costs less, than the Supra is for you.
wb GS













__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm)
 
Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IROC-Z vs. Turbo Supra FastIROCZ28 Camaro Discussions 12 01-23-2012 07:06 PM
AMT supra build! FrankVtec88 WIP - Street 6 03-13-2010 03:17 AM
Toyota supra BEDU Completed Projects / Gallery 9 12-24-2009 06:22 PM
Making my 96 Supra a 9-10 second car... ladeedodd General 2 06-11-2009 04:34 PM
nsx vs sti, sti vs supra, nsx vs evo 9 (with video!) TatII Street Racing 39 10-03-2007 09:21 PM

Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts