|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
08-14-2001, 04:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hartge H50 E46 V8 Info
Hartge H50 E46 V8 Info
General Information Price: $120,000 Miles Per Gallon: --/-- mpg Curb Weight: 3520 lbs Layout: Front-Engine/RWD Transmission: 6-Speed Manual Engine Type: V8 Displacement: 4941 cc Horsepower: 394 bhp @ 6600 rpm  Torque: 369 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm Redline: ---- rpm Performance 0-60 mph: 4.5 sec 0-100 mph: 10.2 sec Quarter Mile: 12.9 sec @ 113 mph Skidpad: .89g Top Speed: 180 mph Braking, 60-0 mph: 119 ft Slalom Speed: --.- mph Other Info Hartge took the M5 V8 engine and placed it into the E46 3-Series. Other modifications include a higher rev limit and a reprogrammed chip.     Nice!! 
__________________
Why do banks charge you a "non-sufficient funds fee" on money they already know you don't have?
|
|
#3
08-14-2001, 09:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
not really cuz it's not an M3. Hartge put the V8 into a 3 series body, not a M3 body. i love that hood!!! the may 2001 issue of car and driver has the H50, but it's only 2 pages long and it doesn't have that sweet hood. i really love the looks. the exhaust configuration is sweet.
little more info.... Street Start 5-60 mph -- 4.9 secs 0-130 -- 17.6 secs 0-150 -- 25.7 secs Roadholding, 300 ft-dia skidpad -- .89 g Braking 70-0 -- 168 ft
__________________
 Please impede from anathematizing me just because I elocute loquacious locutions more Brobdingnaging than one could elucidate with a perspicacity as Lilliputian as your own.
|
|
#4
08-16-2001, 10:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Exactly! It's not an M3. Just a revamped E46. Man, what a revamp at that!!!
__________________
Why do banks charge you a "non-sufficient funds fee" on money they already know you don't have?
|
|
#5
08-22-2001, 02:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
M5
Even though the hertage H50 has the M5 engine is it faster then the M5 it self?
|
|
#6
08-22-2001, 08:27 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, the engine is an M5, so in that point, they should be the same. But taking into consideration that the 3 series is lighter than the M5, I would believe that this car would win. Different settings and stuff, you know.
__________________
Why do banks charge you a "non-sufficient funds fee" on money they already know you don't have?
|
|
#7
08-22-2001, 11:00 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm surpised that they didn't go all out and supercharge that beast. I noticed the different hood also oppsed to the M/T one, is it M5 based or M3 based, or is it custom built?
__________________
 ec437 on grammar; Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#8
08-22-2001, 11:06 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Why do banks charge you a "non-sufficient funds fee" on money they already know you don't have?
|
|
#9
09-03-2001, 03:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
 Why did they even bother with all of that trouble? The new M3 is only .1 of a second slower 0-60 and .3 of a second slower in the 1/4 mile. Don't get me wrong, that car is one bad mo'fo', but for double the price of a new M3, it should be putting up better figures than that.
|
|
#10
09-03-2001, 04:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The contents of this post may be fictitious.
|
|
#11
09-03-2001, 06:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's not .1 second faster than M3. The official time from BMW for M3 was 5.1 seconds like M5 I believe. But everyone knew it was capable of 4.7 seconds without trouble. Now this 4.5 second is the official time for M5 engine powered E46. It can probaly do a little better than 4.5 seconds given time to practice. Anyway I think it is a bad idea because it mess up the weight balanced.
|
|
#12
09-08-2001, 04:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
just to let you know the h50 has 460 hp with the hartge engine mods
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
