-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Coffee Break (Off-Topic) > Politics, Investments & Current Affairs
Register FAQ Community
Politics, Investments & Current Affairs Yea... title kind of explains what this forum is about.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #31  
Old 01-23-2007, 03:10 PM
fredjacksonsan's Avatar
fredjacksonsan fredjacksonsan is offline
Caution: Monkeys bite!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,143
Thanks: 15
Thanked 75 Times in 70 Posts
Send a message via AIM to fredjacksonsan
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazee
Looking over the complete history of China's wars, they were rarely the aggressor. Hell, they made it 4000 years without a single war of conquest.
Wasn't that the time period where they had the constant internal wars? Sun Tzu, and all that?

/off topic
__________________
Ours: 2020 Jeep Wrangler 2.0, 53k
2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser, 84k
Kids: 2005 Honda CRV, 228k
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-23-2007, 03:11 PM
xeroinfinity's Avatar
xeroinfinity xeroinfinity is offline
out saving the world
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 10,707
Thanks: 8
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

I think they better just leave the rest of the satellites alone
__________________
1999 Grand Am SS 3.4 OHV
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-23-2007, 03:15 PM
BNaylor's Avatar
BNaylor BNaylor is offline
AF Moderator
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,017
Thanks: 30
Thanked 54 Times in 42 Posts
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazee
Looking over the complete history of China's wars, they were rarely the aggressor. Hell, they made it 4000 years without a single war of conquest.
I don't know about that. But the most brutal occupation of China was by Japan. Also, they were not exactly pacifists or sitting on the sidelines in the Korean War. Interesting how they lost 900,000 in that war. See link below of chronological events of wars and incidents involving China commencing with the First Opium War 1839-42.

Click here



__________________

'08 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP (Dark Slate Metallic) - LS4 5.3L V8
'02 Oldsmobile Alero GL2 - LA1 3400 V6
'99 Buick Regal LS - L36 Series II 3800 V6
'03 Honda CR250R MX - 2 Stroke 250cc
'97 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP - L67 Series II 3800 V6 Supercharged (Sold)
Timeslip 08/12/06

AF Community Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-23-2007, 03:44 PM
blazee's Avatar
blazee blazee is offline
Problem?
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,248
Thanks: 63
Thanked 114 Times in 94 Posts
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredjacksonsan
Wasn't that the time period where they had the constant internal wars? Sun Tzu, and all that?

/off topic
It's actually the time span from the xia dynasty to present.


Quote:
Originally Posted by bnaylor
I don't know about that. But the most brutal occupation of China was by Japan. Also, they were not exactly pacifists or sitting on the sidelines in the Korean War. Interesting how they lost 900,000 in that war. See link below of chronological events of wars and incidents involving China commencing with the First Opium War 1839-42.

Click here
I wasn't implying that they were pacifists or sitting on the sidelines of any wars, just that they weren't normally the agressors, meaning that they didn't go out of their way to get involved in foreign conflicts (domestic conflicts is another story). You used the Korean War as an example, in that war, China didn't intervene until the UN forces had invaded North Korea and were nearing their borders. Would the US have acted any differently if armed forces were approaching our boarders? Doubtful considering the concern that is drawn from a country on the other side of the world shooting down one of their own satellites.

Taken from the link that you provided:

" As the Allied forces now advanced northward back to the 38th parallel, the Chinese warned that the presence of UN forces in North Korea would be unacceptable to the security of the Chinese People's Republic and would force the Chinese to intervene in the war. UN forces, however, ignored the warnings and advanced into North Korea with the expressed intention of unifying the country. By mid-November the Allied forces were nearing the Yalu River, which marked the border between North Korea and Manchuria, the northeast part of China. The Chinese considered the approach of UN forces to the Yalu to be an unacceptable threat to Manchuria. On November 24 MacArthur announced his "Home by Christmas" offensive, in which his forces would boldly advance right up to the Yalu. The next day approximately 180,000 Chinese "volunteers" entered the war, and by December 15, after bitter winter fighting and a harrowing retreat, the Allied troops had been driven southward back to the 38th parallel. On Dec. 31, 1950, the Communists began their second invasion of South Korea with about 500,000 troops, but their attack soon faltered in the face of incessant Allied aerial bombing campaigns, and the front lines eventually stabilized along the 38th parallel."
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-23-2007, 11:32 PM
BNaylor's Avatar
BNaylor BNaylor is offline
AF Moderator
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,017
Thanks: 30
Thanked 54 Times in 42 Posts
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazee
I wasn't implying that they were pacifists or sitting on the sidelines of any wars, just that they weren't normally the agressors, meaning that they didn't go out of their way to get involved in foreign conflicts (domestic conflicts is another story). You used the Korean War as an example, in that war, China didn't intervene until the UN forces had invaded North Korea and were nearing their borders. Would the US have acted any differently if armed forces were approaching our boarders? Doubtful considering the concern that is drawn from a country on the other side of the world shooting down one of their own satellites.

Taken from the link that you provided:

" As the Allied forces now advanced northward back to the 38th parallel, the Chinese warned that the presence of UN forces in North Korea would be unacceptable to the security of the Chinese People's Republic and would force the Chinese to intervene in the war. UN forces, however, ignored the warnings and advanced into North Korea with the expressed intention of unifying the country. By mid-November the Allied forces were nearing the Yalu River, which marked the border between North Korea and Manchuria, the northeast part of China. The Chinese considered the approach of UN forces to the Yalu to be an unacceptable threat to Manchuria. On November 24 MacArthur announced his "Home by Christmas" offensive, in which his forces would boldly advance right up to the Yalu. The next day approximately 180,000 Chinese "volunteers" entered the war, and by December 15, after bitter winter fighting and a harrowing retreat, the Allied troops had been driven southward back to the 38th parallel. On Dec. 31, 1950, the Communists began their second invasion of South Korea with about 500,000 troops, but their attack soon faltered in the face of incessant Allied aerial bombing campaigns, and the front lines eventually stabilized along the 38th parallel."
You can paint whatever rosey picture of China you want but reasonable minds and opinions will differ.

There is alot more to the history of China and Korea that goes way back centuries and more complex than China simply defending its borders which sounded more like a pretext to invade and in turn, they became the aggressor. In the Korean War the U.S. and its allies were acting on behalf of the U.N. Was there really a need to launch a second invasion during the Korean War? They wanted to have their cake and eat it too but it did not work out too good for them. The casualties they suffered speaks for itself even though their historians claim it was a victory. But they lost out big on the Taiwan issue back then and as a result we have the Taiwan issue today which is IMO what the missile test was really about. They decided to flex their muscle and it back fired on them. Creating the space debris alone was reckless. The U.S. and U.K. are not the only countries to complain about China's latest provocative action. So has Japan, Canada, Australia and other nations.

Quote:
Day to Day, January 19, 2007 - China destroyed one of its satellites last week with a ground-based ballistic missile. This difficult and dangerous feat is the first test of an anti-satellite weapon in more than 20 years. Jeffrey Lewis, director of the Managing the Atom Project at Harvard, talks with Alex Chadwick about the international fallout of China's actions.

NPR Audio Clip Here
What history shows is China destroyed any chance of the reunification of the two Koreas, created a monster in North Korea and lost any chance of any reunification with Taiwan short of another war. And China continues a pattern of human right violations and the last time I checked they were still a Communist country.

Quote:
221-214 B.C. – Under the command of the Emperor’s generals Ming T’ien and Chao T’o, the Ch’in dynasty conquers regions south of the Yangtze river and Northern Korea.
The War of Words Between South Korea and China Over An Ancient Kingdom: Why Both Sides Are Misguided. Click here.

Quote:
For Korean War veteran Zhang Zeshi, North Korea's claim was a bitter betrayal by an "evil" regime. "We have given them so much food, fuel and support, but they don't listen to us," he said.

Zhang, 77, was among more than a million Chinese soldiers sent by Mao Zedong to fight with North Korea in the 1950-53 Korean War. He spent two years in a South Korean POW camp. He was imprisoned again when he returned home, disgraced along with other former POWs for failing to die in battle against American "aggressors."

"We spilled our blood in vain," Zhang said. "It kept alive (North Korea's) feudal dictatorship."

USA Today Article
IMO the belief and comments of Chinese Korean War Veteran Zhang Zeshi speaks for itself. Yup, them darn Chinese are just a bunch of good ole boys. No need to worry about them.



__________________

'08 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP (Dark Slate Metallic) - LS4 5.3L V8
'02 Oldsmobile Alero GL2 - LA1 3400 V6
'99 Buick Regal LS - L36 Series II 3800 V6
'03 Honda CR250R MX - 2 Stroke 250cc
'97 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP - L67 Series II 3800 V6 Supercharged (Sold)
Timeslip 08/12/06

AF Community Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-23-2007, 11:54 PM
VR43000GT's Avatar
VR43000GT VR43000GT is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,091
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to VR43000GT
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

^^ Well done and I am in total agreement with you.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-24-2007, 12:03 AM
Muscletang's Avatar
Muscletang Muscletang is offline
AF Premium User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 11 Posts
opcorn:
__________________
For a long time it gave me nightmares... witnessing an injustice like that... it's a constant reminder of just how unfair this world can be... I can still hear them taunting him.......

silly rabbit, tricks are for kids...

I mean, WHY COULDN'T THEY JUST GIVE HIM SOME CEREAL?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lars Ulrich
What?! Record sales are slumping? Must be from all those pirates. Can't be because we started sucking 10 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-24-2007, 11:31 AM
drunken monkey's Avatar
drunken monkey drunken monkey is offline
Razor Sharp Twit
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,865
Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 22 Posts
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

I'm not saying China is a good country, just that it seems laughable to me that the UK and US and others are so quick to condemn this action when they themselves are guilty of many other equally bad things.
__________________
AF's Guidelines

Read them.

__________________


Currently in the process of re-hosting my photos.
If any go missing, drop me a PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 01-24-2007, 11:41 AM
fredjacksonsan's Avatar
fredjacksonsan fredjacksonsan is offline
Caution: Monkeys bite!
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,143
Thanks: 15
Thanked 75 Times in 70 Posts
Send a message via AIM to fredjacksonsan
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

I don't believe blowing up one of your own satellites is something to be condemned for.

Of course people (read that: paranoid governments) are worried what the Chinese might do, rather than what they are doing. Same thing as N Korea and nukes.
__________________
Ours: 2020 Jeep Wrangler 2.0, 53k
2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser, 84k
Kids: 2005 Honda CRV, 228k
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 01-24-2007, 02:11 PM
BNaylor's Avatar
BNaylor BNaylor is offline
AF Moderator
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18,017
Thanks: 30
Thanked 54 Times in 42 Posts
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

There may be more to this than what has been publicized. It turns out that China may be playing a game of cat and mouse with the U.S. When they start screwing with our satellites there is cause for concern.

Quote:
"It may have been no coincidence that, within weeks, China ruffled American feathers by using a ground-based laser to illuminate a US satellite -- and highlight its own reach into space," it said.

Article Click Here
If we lose any satellites or a space shuttle mission based on China's actions or inactions then there will be more than condemnation.



__________________

'08 Pontiac Grand Prix GXP (Dark Slate Metallic) - LS4 5.3L V8
'02 Oldsmobile Alero GL2 - LA1 3400 V6
'99 Buick Regal LS - L36 Series II 3800 V6
'03 Honda CR250R MX - 2 Stroke 250cc
'97 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP - L67 Series II 3800 V6 Supercharged (Sold)
Timeslip 08/12/06

AF Community Guidelines
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 01-24-2007, 05:58 PM
taranaki's Avatar
taranaki taranaki is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 16,048
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnaylor
There may be more to this than what has been publicized. It turns out that China may be playing a game of cat and mouse with the U.S. When they start screwing with our satellites there is cause for concern.



If we lose any satellites or a space shuttle mission based on China's actions or inactions then there will be more than condemnation.
weird. America has lost 2 space shuttle missions and numerous satellites due to its own failings, and people just shrug .Yet when the Chinese look like they might be developing reliable technology of their own, people start assuming that it's going to be used against them. As for whining about XM/Sirius, GET REAL.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-24-2007, 07:02 PM
xeroinfinity's Avatar
xeroinfinity xeroinfinity is offline
out saving the world
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 10,707
Thanks: 8
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Re: Escalation in the Weaponization of Space?

I think we all should have them, then no one would use them ... maybe

We may need them when the aliens come back to collect thier next of kin and the spacecrafts we confiscated/impounded
__________________
1999 Grand Am SS 3.4 OHV
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Coffee Break (Off-Topic) > Politics, Investments & Current Affairs


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts