|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SS/SC Vs. 350z
Quote:
His best dyno was 491hp and 422tq at the MFing wheels. Same heads, cam, intake, TB, fuel system, and tuneing from TSP/PRC. I got all the little details before I started spending money. My bank account went down about 4K this month but I think it was worth it.
__________________
![]() NX wet Kit to add a few more hp
|
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: SS/SC Vs. 350z
I'll say.
$400 cam - 70 whp. not bad |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SS/SC Vs. 350z
Quote:
__________________
2001 MR2 Spyder Magnaflow Muffler and OBX CAI. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SS/SC Vs. 350z
Quote:
seats retainers pushrods ported ls6 oil pump gaskets better lifters that won't collapse and tuneing to benefit from the swap. My first sig was too long so I had to shorten it to the main parts.
__________________
![]() NX wet Kit to add a few more hp
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: SS/SC Vs. 350z
Quote:
+198478471028471 I can't say enough about tuning. Any type of power/performance upgrade you do to your car. In order to get the most out of it. You must, must, must tune it! I've seen so many stangs from AZ that run around H/C/I with no tuning done. And they are out beating on their cars with who knows what kind of Air/Fuel ratio. Tuning is key! ok sorry for the rant heh.
__________________
1990 Mustang GT. |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|