|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
02-18-2006, 01:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Porting Heads Vs Turbo Charging A Sl Model?
i WANNA TURBO CHARGE MY SL BUT I WAS THINKIN WHAT WOULD BE BETTER PORTING MY HEADS OR JUST TUBO CHARGING IT. wHAT WOULD BE CHEAPER AND GIVE ME MORE HORSE POWER?
Last edited by TAZ88; 02-19-2006 at 10:49 PM. 
|
|
#2
02-19-2006, 12:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Porting Heads Vs Turbo Charging A Sl Model?
Buy a VR-4. It'll be cheaper, and the parts are already there.
__________________
Black 1997 3000GT  Quote:
|
|
#3
02-19-2006, 08:51 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Porting Heads Vs Turbo Charging A Sl Model?
Quote:
May I suggest doing a bit more research because that statement is contradictory. Unless "shooting some pounds of boost" is a reference to nitrous, and even still...it sounds like you are a bit confused.
__________________
96 3000gt vr4 -K&N FIPK -Proboost mbc -Cusco front + rear strut bars -Greddy type-s -ATR downpipe -no cats -15Gs, 3sx aluminum pulley, FMIC, SAFC, walboro pump, EVO 560ccs, and Meth Injection Kit all waiting to go in shortly. Your 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 is the 92nd out of the 315 that were made that year. Only 21 of which are exactly identical.
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
