|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#61
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: rb20 vs sr20
It would be too much, i want prolly about 350+-50hp range
__________________
VR6> Anything FWD sucks for understeer? Swaybars do magic. |
|
#62
|
||||
|
||||
|
You wouldn't be able to drive that on the streets anyways, horrible power curve and a clutch that it would take 2 legs to push in, just no fun.
Edit: I'm talking about the 700hp setup. Last edited by logik23; 10-14-2004 at 01:38 PM. |
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: rb20 vs sr20
i think 250hp sounds good
__________________
shinrekka 1 : i think the carburater needed to be rebuilt and were gonna drop the gas tank NoLlieSkillz : its called NoLlieSkillz : neutral drop at redline |
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: rb20 vs sr20
Quote:
http://www.superstreetonline.com/featuredvehicles/3516/ Found it. |
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
im srry to post this but
"GB Phoenix77 HP might be close... maybe SR might have a very slight advantage. The RB20's stock turbo runs out at about 290. {But tourque will be better with the RB}.. overall powerband will be better on the RB. RB sounds better!! RB20 is the best value of the RB line." i dissagree, a 2l 4cyl vs a 2l 6cyl, the 4 will produce more tq because each fire of the piston has more power than the 6 "ima use bike engines for example" take a 650cc dirtbike vs a 650cc 4cyl, thats 650cc fireing and producing all its power and tq at once, 650cc/4 is only 162.5cc per cyl, it makes smooth power and makes moke hp but tq wise its beat |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|