|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: rsx or camry solora | |||
| rsx |
   
|
3 | 100.00% |
| solora |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| none |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
 Show Printable Version | 
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
05-12-2005, 05:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
2002 acura RSX base Vs 2001 toyota Camry Solora SE
http://clearchannel.carsoup.com/used...iewID=4&Page=1
i can get the solora for 12,900 i can get the RSX for 15.599 http://clearchannel.carsoup.com/used...iewID=4&Page=1 liked the rsx feel overall but liked the camrys space also disliked the RSXs rearview while i disliked the camrys SIZE my gf works at a dealer ship so im basically gettin these cars at cost list price on the rsx is 18, while it being 16k on the toyota....opinons people 
|
|
#2
05-12-2005, 07:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2002 acura RSX base Vs 2001 toyota Camry Solora SE
I'd take the RSX, look nicer imo, sportier, and overall a very well built car. But it really depends on what you need the car for.
__________________
dSoc member #67 1995 Honda del Sol EG2 VTEC Milano Red. RIP :crook: 1994 Honda del Sol EG1 S-full VTEC conversion. Buy my Del Sol parts!!
|
|
#3
05-13-2005, 01:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 2002 acura RSX base Vs 2001 toyota Camry Solora SE
Quote:
yea as do I, Im 21 years old so I dont really need a roomy car, All I have to get used to is the Hatchback style in the rear view!
|
|
#4
05-14-2005, 12:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2002 acura RSX base Vs 2001 toyota Camry Solora SE
the solara will be alot cheaper to insure and in my opinion is alot better for everyday driving. Also, that price for the RSX is way too high.
__________________
Dr. Disque - Current cars: 2008 BMW 135i M-Sport 2011 Mazda2 Touring Past cars: 2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT 1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec
|
|
#5
05-14-2005, 07:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 2002 acura RSX base Vs 2001 toyota Camry Solora SE
Quote:
how do you figure? they paid 14,900 for it...there selling it to me for 15,500 blue book is 17ish
|
|
#6
05-14-2005, 01:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2002 acura RSX base Vs 2001 toyota Camry Solora SE
does it have ridiculously low mileage? like under 15000? Otherwise I can't see paying that much for a 3 year old car that offers such little power or amenities.
__________________
Dr. Disque - Current cars: 2008 BMW 135i M-Sport 2011 Mazda2 Touring Past cars: 2007 Mazda 6S 5-door MT 1999 Ford Taurus SE Duratec
|
|
#7
05-16-2005, 01:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 2002 acura RSX base Vs 2001 toyota Camry Solora SE
Quote:
thats pretty much the going rate on all used RSX's
|
|
#8
05-20-2005, 10:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
i would go with the salora only becasue ibe driven one with a manual gearbox (V6)and it hauled ass. i mean i like both cars... but i think with a manual the salora, BUT if you dont want manual then i would go with the acura. *hope it helps*
__________________
 <~~  that would look better in my driveway!
|
|
#9
05-20-2005, 10:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
i would go with the salora only becasue ibe driven one with a manual gearbox (V6) and it hauled ass. i mean i like both cars... but i think with a manual the salora, BUT if you dont want manual then i would go with the acura. *hope it helps*
__________________
<~~ that would look better in my driveway!
|
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
