|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Performance Anything you ever wanted to know about boosting the performance of your Cavalier. |
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Differences Eco/LD9
I hope this doesn't start a whole Ecotec Versus LD9 argument.. but what's the difference between the two? Layout wise? Valves? Pistons? Timing? Cams? The whole thing?
If this question's already been answered please direct me to the nearest thread? I can't seem to find one ><. I have lost many a night of sleep over this. And how's this 2.4L Ecotec coming along? Are our LD9's toast or is it hype I hear about this new Eco? Followup: Did some searching while at work. Found a page on the LD9 if anyone cares it's http://www.quad4forums.com/darkfox/Spec.htm
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24. 2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades. Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... >< |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: whitby
Posts: 1,673
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Differences Eco/LD9
Quote:
No the 2.4 EcoTec isn't hype it will appear in a staunr and a pontiac later this year! Shush though! It's not actually all that different from the ld9!! The Ecotec 2.2 has .5:1 more comp ratio (10:1). The cam lift is good but the duration very short which makes me think that the cams will be more or less shot before the car hits 100,000 miles! It's alu block and head on the eco and the block on the ld9 Iron! It doesn't really differ too much in design and some people think it's a re-worked LD-9. There is only one ecotec in the states currently if you could the destroked ss/ s/c and ion redline motor as the same. However in Europe where the EcoTec has been around for about 7 years there are 1l 1.2l 1.4l 1.6l 1.8l and 2.0l variants! The 1l being a 3 cylinder! Personally I hate that thing! (1l although the car it powers is smaller than an aveo)They have been reliable in the european forms but I don't know how similar the achitecture is to the 2.2l version. My buddy has a screen saver that shows an Ecotec going together it's good and very similar to the ld-9n from that!
__________________
Red Z24 = Dead, 03 2 door = 15.5 with no traction. low 15's here i come 'Never forget Grasshopper, Not speed, smile!' |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
|
Re: Differences Eco/LD9
So you're telling me I don't need to grab my credit card and start charging this 2.4L Eco to my credit eh? Ah all is well...
We'll just have to wait and see what this new Ecotec holds for us. yes I'm talking to all the new car owners in the latter part of this year, let me know what it's like.
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24. 2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades. Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... >< |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Differences Eco/LD9
does anyone know the specific specs on the 2.4L eco? I could prolly look it up, im just to lazy. I thought it was 170HP, but whats its compression? Im gonna guess its higher than 10:1, maybe 10.5:1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: whitby
Posts: 1,673
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Differences Eco/LD9
Quote:
__________________
Red Z24 = Dead, 03 2 door = 15.5 with no traction. low 15's here i come 'Never forget Grasshopper, Not speed, smile!' |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
|
Re: Re: Differences Eco/LD9
Quote:
this is all I could find. The combination of slightly more displacement and variable valve timing enables the Ecotec 2.4-liter to achieve one of the highest torque ratings – an estimated 170 lb.-ft. – for a 2.4-liter normally aspirated four-cylinder in the United States And the Ecotec 2.4-liter's 170 horsepower at 6000 rpm also is one of the highest specific-power outputs for any non-boosted four-cylinder of any size sold in the U.S., according to Ward's 2003 market data. from : http://www.xtremega.com/forums/showthread.php?t=625 feel free to tear that website apart as you wish.
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24. 2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades. Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... >< |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: whitby
Posts: 1,673
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Differences Eco/LD9
Quote:
that's wrong about highest unboosted 4 cyl! F20c from S2000 240hp from 2.0l and K20 from rsx type S 210hp from 2.0!
__________________
Red Z24 = Dead, 03 2 door = 15.5 with no traction. low 15's here i come 'Never forget Grasshopper, Not speed, smile!' |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Differences Eco/LD9
yeah even the B22a makes 190HP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
|
Re: Differences Eco/LD9
Do the numbers sound right though? Apparently that's all I could find, then again I'm pretty lazy
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24. 2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades. Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... >< |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Lifted GMT-360!
![]() |
Re: Differences Eco/LD9
This is the first time i'd heard of the 2.4L ecotec. Was this brought up in the Cobalt forums Noshun? You've got me clueless on whats going on.
__________________
Please don't PM me with your J-body Issues. Post appropriately in the forums, and I will toss my opinion in your thread if I have anything to help. - Thanks! 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer 2010 Glastron GT 205XL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NE, Tennessee
Posts: 484
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Differences Eco/LD9
But do the F20c, K20, B22a have 170lbs of torque at ~4400RPM? Also the Ecotec 2.4 makes 90% of that 170 at 2400 RPM, and 170 at 6000RPM. Maybe they are saying it's the best US motor sold in the US, or that's what they should have said. Look at the torque curve here http://www.quad4forums.com/darkfox/Spec.htm I have never seen a torque curve that hits peak twice! Once at 2400 and again at 4400, any other motors like this? I'd like to find a site that has stock-trim dynos for newer 4cyl motors, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Chevys, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Differences Eco/LD9
Quote:
The LD9 does, same exact points. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
|
Re: Differences Eco/LD9
So I suppose it holds true what noshun said? that the 2.4L Eco is just a reworked LD9? Hmm we might be on to something here.
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24. 2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades. Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... >< |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
AF Regular
![]() |
i've never heard of this 2.4 eco. Are they throwing it in the cavalier for 2006? or what car is it going in? Fill me in - I'm looking at getting a new car and I can't decide between the Acura RSX Type S or Chevy Cobalt SS - both have their ups and downs... but I'd wait for another Jbody if its giong into a cavalier. Much cheaper overall. THanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flint, Michigan
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Differences Eco/LD9
j-bodies are gone man, never to return......
__________________
For Health, Hope, and Future...advocare.com mem ID: 02122231 |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|