Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Cavalier > Performance
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Performance Anything you ever wanted to know about boosting the performance of your Cavalier.
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2005, 07:23 PM   #1
inarifennec
AF Enthusiast
 
inarifennec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winnemucca, Nevada
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to inarifennec Send a message via MSN to inarifennec Send a message via Yahoo to inarifennec
Differences Eco/LD9

I hope this doesn't start a whole Ecotec Versus LD9 argument.. but what's the difference between the two? Layout wise? Valves? Pistons? Timing? Cams? The whole thing?

If this question's already been answered please direct me to the nearest thread? I can't seem to find one ><. I have lost many a night of sleep over this.

And how's this 2.4L Ecotec coming along? Are our LD9's toast or is it hype I hear about this new Eco?

Followup: Did some searching while at work. Found a page on the LD9 if anyone cares it's http://www.quad4forums.com/darkfox/Spec.htm
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24.
2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades.

Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... ><
inarifennec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 08:12 PM   #2
noshun
AF Enthusiast
 
noshun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: whitby
Posts: 1,673
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Differences Eco/LD9

Quote:
Originally Posted by inarifennec
I hope this doesn't start a whole Ecotec Versus LD9 argument.. but what's the difference between the two? Layout wise? Valves? Pistons? Timing? Cams? The whole thing?

If this question's already been answered please direct me to the nearest thread? I can't seem to find one ><. I have lost many a night of sleep over this.

And how's this 2.4L Ecotec coming along? Are our LD9's toast or is it hype I hear about this new Eco?

Followup: Did some searching while at work. Found a page on the LD9 if anyone cares it's http://www.quad4forums.com/darkfox/Spec.htm

No the 2.4 EcoTec isn't hype it will appear in a staunr and a pontiac later this year! Shush though! It's not actually all that different from the ld9!!

The Ecotec 2.2 has .5:1 more comp ratio (10:1). The cam lift is good but the duration very short which makes me think that the cams will be more or less shot before the car hits 100,000 miles! It's alu block and head on the eco and the block on the ld9 Iron! It doesn't really differ too much in design and some people think it's a re-worked LD-9. There is only one ecotec in the states currently if you could the destroked ss/ s/c and ion redline motor as the same. However in Europe where the EcoTec has been around for about 7 years there are 1l 1.2l 1.4l 1.6l 1.8l and 2.0l variants! The 1l being a 3 cylinder! Personally I hate that thing! (1l although the car it powers is smaller than an aveo)They have been reliable in the european forms but I don't know how similar the achitecture is to the 2.2l version. My buddy has a screen saver that shows an Ecotec going together it's good and very similar to the ld-9n from that!
__________________
Red Z24 = Dead, 03 2 door = 15.5 with no traction. low 15's here i come

'Never forget Grasshopper, Not speed, smile!'
noshun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 10:36 PM   #3
inarifennec
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
inarifennec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winnemucca, Nevada
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to inarifennec Send a message via MSN to inarifennec Send a message via Yahoo to inarifennec
Re: Differences Eco/LD9

So you're telling me I don't need to grab my credit card and start charging this 2.4L Eco to my credit eh? Ah all is well...

We'll just have to wait and see what this new Ecotec holds for us. yes I'm talking to all the new car owners in the latter part of this year, let me know what it's like.
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24.
2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades.

Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... ><
inarifennec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 11:55 PM   #4
-Jayson-
AF Enthusiast
 
-Jayson-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Differences Eco/LD9

does anyone know the specific specs on the 2.4L eco? I could prolly look it up, im just to lazy. I thought it was 170HP, but whats its compression? Im gonna guess its higher than 10:1, maybe 10.5:1.
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
-Jayson- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 11:57 PM   #5
noshun
AF Enthusiast
 
noshun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: whitby
Posts: 1,673
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Differences Eco/LD9

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Jayson-
does anyone know the specific specs on the 2.4L eco? I could prolly look it up, im just to lazy. I thought it was 170HP, but whats its compression? Im gonna guess its higher than 10:1, maybe 10.5:1.
No I believe 10:1. no specs around for it I can find aprt from that. not been released so no geeks have gotten their hands on it yet!
__________________
Red Z24 = Dead, 03 2 door = 15.5 with no traction. low 15's here i come

'Never forget Grasshopper, Not speed, smile!'
noshun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 12:26 AM   #6
inarifennec
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
inarifennec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winnemucca, Nevada
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to inarifennec Send a message via MSN to inarifennec Send a message via Yahoo to inarifennec
Re: Re: Differences Eco/LD9

Quote:
Originally Posted by -Jayson-
does anyone know the specific specs on the 2.4L eco? I could prolly look it up, im just to lazy. I thought it was 170HP, but whats its compression? Im gonna guess its higher than 10:1, maybe 10.5:1.
as far as I know its 170 Horses, Beyond that there's not much that I know about it.

this is all I could find.

The combination of slightly more displacement and variable valve timing enables the Ecotec 2.4-liter to achieve one of the highest torque ratings – an estimated 170 lb.-ft. – for a 2.4-liter normally aspirated four-cylinder in the United States And the Ecotec 2.4-liter's 170 horsepower at 6000 rpm also is one of the highest specific-power outputs for any non-boosted four-cylinder of any size sold in the U.S., according to Ward's 2003 market data.

from : http://www.xtremega.com/forums/showthread.php?t=625

feel free to tear that website apart as you wish.
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24.
2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades.

Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... ><
inarifennec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 11:08 AM   #7
noshun
AF Enthusiast
 
noshun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: whitby
Posts: 1,673
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Differences Eco/LD9

Quote:
Originally Posted by inarifennec
as far as I know its 170 Horses, Beyond that there's not much that I know about it.

this is all I could find.

The combination of slightly more displacement and variable valve timing enables the Ecotec 2.4-liter to achieve one of the highest torque ratings – an estimated 170 lb.-ft. – for a 2.4-liter normally aspirated four-cylinder in the United States And the Ecotec 2.4-liter's 170 horsepower at 6000 rpm also is one of the highest specific-power outputs for any non-boosted four-cylinder of any size sold in the U.S., according to Ward's 2003 market data.

from : http://www.xtremega.com/forums/showthread.php?t=625

feel free to tear that website apart as you wish.

that's wrong about highest unboosted 4 cyl! F20c from S2000 240hp from 2.0l and K20 from rsx type S 210hp from 2.0!
__________________
Red Z24 = Dead, 03 2 door = 15.5 with no traction. low 15's here i come

'Never forget Grasshopper, Not speed, smile!'
noshun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 12:27 PM   #8
-Jayson-
AF Enthusiast
 
-Jayson-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Differences Eco/LD9

yeah even the B22a makes 190HP
__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
-Jayson- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 03:18 PM   #9
inarifennec
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
inarifennec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winnemucca, Nevada
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to inarifennec Send a message via MSN to inarifennec Send a message via Yahoo to inarifennec
Re: Differences Eco/LD9

Do the numbers sound right though? Apparently that's all I could find, then again I'm pretty lazy
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24.
2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades.

Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... ><
inarifennec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2005, 03:45 PM   #10
Classicrocjunkie
Lifted GMT-360!
 
Classicrocjunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Syracuse, New York
Posts: 5,258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Classicrocjunkie
Re: Differences Eco/LD9

This is the first time i'd heard of the 2.4L ecotec. Was this brought up in the Cobalt forums Noshun? You've got me clueless on whats going on.
__________________
Please don't PM me with your J-body Issues. Post appropriately in the forums,
and I will toss my opinion in your thread if I have anything to help. - Thanks!


2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer
2010 Glastron GT 205XL
Classicrocjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2005, 01:46 PM   #11
4dr92cavi4cyl
AF Enthusiast
 
4dr92cavi4cyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NE, Tennessee
Posts: 484
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Differences Eco/LD9

But do the F20c, K20, B22a have 170lbs of torque at ~4400RPM? Also the Ecotec 2.4 makes 90% of that 170 at 2400 RPM, and 170 at 6000RPM. Maybe they are saying it's the best US motor sold in the US, or that's what they should have said. Look at the torque curve here http://www.quad4forums.com/darkfox/Spec.htm I have never seen a torque curve that hits peak twice! Once at 2400 and again at 4400, any other motors like this? I'd like to find a site that has stock-trim dynos for newer 4cyl motors, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Chevys, etc.
__________________


Odometer: 223259 & still running like a horse!

Rockin' to: Dream Theater, Queensryche, Symphony X, and Pagan's Mind. Check them out!
The "radio groups" these days have lost creativity and skill. It's the same thing for five minutes.
4dr92cavi4cyl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2005, 02:06 PM   #12
-Jayson-
AF Enthusiast
 
-Jayson-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dearborn, Michigan
Posts: 3,634
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Differences Eco/LD9

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4dr92cavi4cyl
But do the F20c, K20, B22a have 170lbs of torque at ~4400RPM? Also the Ecotec 2.4 makes 90% of that 170 at 2400 RPM, and 170 at 6000RPM. Maybe they are saying it's the best US motor sold in the US, or that's what they should have said. Look at the torque curve here http://www.quad4forums.com/darkfox/Spec.htm I have never seen a torque curve that hits peak twice! Once at 2400 and again at 4400, any other motors like this? I'd like to find a site that has stock-trim dynos for newer 4cyl motors, Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Chevys, etc.

The LD9 does, same exact points.

__________________
2009 Ninja 650 R
stock for now...

SouthEast Ecotec Enthusiast
-Jayson- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2005, 04:23 PM   #13
inarifennec
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
inarifennec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Winnemucca, Nevada
Posts: 218
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to inarifennec Send a message via MSN to inarifennec Send a message via Yahoo to inarifennec
Re: Differences Eco/LD9

So I suppose it holds true what noshun said? that the 2.4L Eco is just a reworked LD9? Hmm we might be on to something here.
__________________
Car - 2001 Chevrolet Cavalier z24.
2.4L LD9 with Catback Exhaust and Injen Cold Air intake. (Soon to be a High Output Intake) And a few Visual upgrades.

Former car - 1984 Nissan 200SX .... Died in a Tragic head on collision, the pizza delivery girl never saw me supposedly... ><
inarifennec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2005, 04:55 PM   #14
cavispeedracer
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Brookfield, Wisconsin
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to cavispeedracer
i've never heard of this 2.4 eco. Are they throwing it in the cavalier for 2006? or what car is it going in? Fill me in - I'm looking at getting a new car and I can't decide between the Acura RSX Type S or Chevy Cobalt SS - both have their ups and downs... but I'd wait for another Jbody if its giong into a cavalier. Much cheaper overall. THanks
__________________
1996 Camaro RS


1997 Cavalier Z24 Modified
1/4 mile 15.5 at 89mph
FOR SALE!
cavispeedracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2005, 05:39 PM   #15
DARKRAIN
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flint, Michigan
Posts: 53
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Differences Eco/LD9

j-bodies are gone man, never to return......
__________________
For Health, Hope, and Future...advocare.com mem ID: 02122231
DARKRAIN is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Chevrolet > Cavalier > Performance


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts