-
Grand Future Air Dried Beef Dog Food

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Air Dried Dog Food | Real Beef
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Blazer
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 01-14-2005, 04:38 PM
slreno1217 slreno1217 is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 119
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

96 blazer with 4.3 vortec. cpi.

was just told by a mechanic that the fuel pressure regulator actually open and closed according to temperature. ie: when warm is closed and when cold is open.

is this true?

he is telling this is my no start problem when it is cold but when i have the oil heater pluged in the oil and engine is warm leaving the regulator closed and blazers starts fine.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2005, 04:58 PM
BlazerLT's Avatar
BlazerLT BlazerLT is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

Nope, regulator is pressure controlled not temperature controlled.

And your 1996 is not a CPI, it is a CSFI.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2005, 10:58 PM
ricksza's Avatar
ricksza ricksza is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 554
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

Actually, the force of the engine vacuum inside the upper plenium controls the regulator which controls fuel pressure.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-15-2005, 11:24 PM
BlazerLT's Avatar
BlazerLT BlazerLT is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

Yes, that is what I said.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-15-2005, 11:39 PM
Turbocpe Turbocpe is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 168
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

I think he was saying that there is a difference between "pressure" and vacuum. The regulator sees vacuum not pressure.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-16-2005, 12:09 AM
BlazerLT's Avatar
BlazerLT BlazerLT is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbocpe
I think he was saying that there is a difference between "pressure" and vacuum. The regulator sees vacuum not pressure.
For crhist sakes , vacuum is pressure.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-16-2005, 12:49 AM
Turbocpe Turbocpe is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 168
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

A bit defensive? If I'm wrong, I'm sorry, but at times that is how it seems to come across as.

I still would refer to it as vacuum instead of "pressure".
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-16-2005, 03:09 AM
BlazerLT's Avatar
BlazerLT BlazerLT is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbocpe
A bit defensive? If I'm wrong, I'm sorry, but at times that is how it seems to come across as.

I still would refer to it as vacuum instead of "pressure".
No, I am a trained and certified fluid power and pneumatic technologist and vacuum is negative pressure.

They are the same. So please stop arguing against me.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-16-2005, 03:18 AM
Turbocpe Turbocpe is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 168
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlazerLT

So please stop arguing against me.
You may have been here longer than myself, but that does not mean that I'm a lesser of a person. You've been wrong before as well. Please drop the attitude. We are here to learn and help each other. Many times when your advise or input is questioned, you get defensive and belittle them with an attitude. It would be nice if you would simply help me learn when I'm (or others) are wrong.

I honestly didn't think you could have "negative pressure". I thought that pressure was always positive.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-16-2005, 04:20 AM
BlazerLT's Avatar
BlazerLT BlazerLT is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: Re: Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbocpe
You may have been here longer than myself, but that does not mean that I'm a lesser of a person. You've been wrong before as well. Please drop the attitude. We are here to learn and help each other. Many times when your advise or input is questioned, you get defensive and belittle them with an attitude. It would be nice if you would simply help me learn when I'm (or others) are wrong.

I honestly didn't think you could have "negative pressure". I thought that pressure was always positive.
Hmmm...

That's funny, I believe that you are the one that said I was wrong and now that I have proved that I am right you say I am pulling attitude?

How does rank come into any of this, I never pulled the "I've been here longer" crap so please just drop it.

Sad day when some can't prove he is right without having someone taking offense to it.

Please, just let it go.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-16-2005, 03:20 PM
Turbocpe Turbocpe is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 168
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

How have you proved that you were right? You simply told me that you're "a trained and certified fluid power and pneumatic technologist and vacuum is negative pressure" and basically told me to shut up. How does that help anyone?

Sadly I didn't learn anything other than it confirmed that you often get defensive with an attitude when someone questions your input (regardless if you was right or wrong). You expect everyone to simply believe something without going into it a bit?

We are here to learn and help each other.

I did a search online and I often seen the phrase that it is "misleading" to refer to vacuum as negative pressure because pressure is "always positive".

You didn't offer any explanation to it.

I said I would refer to it as vacuum because that is exactly what it is, vacuum. I could be wrong, but I thought that generally in the real world, people refer to pressure that is often measured in PSI.

I was was trying to help the poster clarify any confusion, which is also what I think ricksza was trying to do as well.

Sad day when you can't help others without it turning into this.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-16-2005, 04:02 PM
BlazerLT's Avatar
BlazerLT BlazerLT is offline
AF -Advisor
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 13,565
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

To the thread starter, I am sincerely sorry.

Seems people can't let things go.

Again slreno1217, sorry about this.
__________________
1995 Factory Blazer Service Manual for sale, PM if interested.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-16-2005, 08:47 PM
tom3 tom3 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 662
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: can anyone verify this (1996 blazer)

Well you have PSI and PSIG. In the absolute the PSI is the pressure above no pressure, or perfect vacuum as we call it, the PSIG is what a gauge reads above the constant pressure of the atmosphere. So a perfect vacuum is only about 14.3 lbs negative pressure to put it in shadetree terms. PSIG is what we usually refer to. And the regulator controls the pressure from a spring inside the regulator and is also further adjusted by the engine vacuum once started. Temperature is not a factor in this deal, but it does control fuel mixture in other ways.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Chevrolet > Blazer


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:14 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts