GT 500 vs Yenko Camaro

[Filthy Sanchez]

Track = GT500
Strip = Yenko

Camaro ugly!!!??? Both are beautiful cars man. Though I'd rather have a run of the mill stang or camaro and restomodify it (with a Shelby or Yenko that'd be like cutting up the Mona Lisa) and get away from the 60's suspension and handling.


P.S. Hey Yogs GO WINGS!

[syr74]

I think this is a strictly subjective issue. Perfromance was so up for grabs you can't just say "this one is faster" Keep in mind that even though the 428PI and CJ are listed as the available engines for the GT500's you could "get" just about any engine you wanted in a GT500 if you asked nicely and ponied up the dough.

There is more than one 427ci GT500 running around and a couple of those are tunnel ports. Actually though, as stupid fast as a 427 tunnel port GT500 would be I would rather have a 428CJ car money aside. If only because the tunnel port would be damn near unstreetable.

[syr74]

Oh, btw. After 68 you got what they shoved under the hood. If you wanted something wild you would have had to have gotten it in 67 or 68.

[96berettakid]

Pulling my hair out trying to decide. Why can't I have both? I can't stress enough how much I love both cars. But, I've been a Mustang lover since I can remember, so I gotta go with the Shelby.

[chevydrummer76]

yenko all the way......even though most of them left are just yenko clones

[comeonstart]

You found my 2 favorite cars of all time here, I vote GT-500 simply cause I do

[tanner07]

I would take a '69 COPO Camaro with the ZL1 427 and dog dish rims over either of them.

[NISSANSPDR]

This is like 5 months old man...lock it up!

[tanner07]

Wow...sorry, I was sure I got here from the "Latest Discussions" link

Someone must have voted in the poll. I feel like a tool. Sorry guys, won't happen again.