|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#17
08-29-2004, 06:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1994 3000GT SL or 2002 Subaru WRX
$16525
|
|
#18
08-29-2004, 10:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1994 3000GT SL or 2002 Subaru WRX
I'd sell the SL and buy a VR4 ...just my opinion lol
__________________
|
|
#19
08-30-2004, 05:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
see if you can find a VR4 with comparable miles for a comparable price. If you can, i'd go with the VR4, but if not, go WRX.
__________________
93 3000GT base K&N | long tube headers | 3sx crank pulley| testpipe | Addco front/rear sway bars (3SX) | rear strut bar & front 3-point strut bar (by JonVr4 on 3Si) | solid motor mounts | LSD insert | KYB GR-2 struts | intrax springs | adj. control arms | ss brake lines | 16% taller 5th gear (teamrip.com) | H4 conversion | push-button start | datalogger | HKS S-AFR | PLX WB O2 coming soon: adj. cam gears | bi-xenon HID retrofit
|
|
#20
08-30-2004, 05:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1994 3000GT SL or 2002 Subaru WRX
though i love the 3kgt more than any car, i am in love with performance and turbo charged power. so i'd go with the wrx also. if you arent so serious about racing then get the 3kgt, if you have lots of money, you can turn that sl into a monster
__________________
|
|
#21
08-31-2004, 12:46 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 1994 3000GT SL or 2002 Subaru WRX
Quote:
http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.s...&&&usedcarstab The 2002 WRX is 300-400 lbs. lighter than the 1994 3000GT SL.
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
