|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
Which is better Reliability, overall performance, and why. (support your answer)
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
Supra is stronger in all those catergories...it will probably get out handled if it's a tight course...but a more open road course it will hang w/the WRX
The motor (2JZ-GTE) is stronger and so is the tranny...you can get TONS of HP out of it w/o even touching the internals... |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
I think you would still have a fight if you threw the sti into the mix, at higher speeds at least
__________________
1987 Honda Accord LX-Dead 1999 Honda Accord EX-L 5 sp-Sold 2006 Subaru WRX Wagon 5sp-Sold 2005 Nissan Frontier ext cab 4x4 4.0L-Sold 2006 Kawasaki Ninja 500r-Sold 2004 Yamaha FZ1 Silver/Black- Sold ![]() 2008 Mazdaspeed 3-In the driveway |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
Yeah I believe the STI would be better match, The Supra is just too powerful for the WRX. The Supra is an awesome handling car, skidpad numbers are .95g and higher. Braking for the Supra Twin Turbo is under 120FT, while the WRX cannot stop in such a short distance. Overall the Supra is the better performance vehicle. As far as reliability, the Supra is a very reliable car, but let's not forget that Toyota stop selling Supras here in 1998, so even the newest ones are 6 years old, and that can affect reliability simply due to age. Yet the Supras have held up well. I think the STI would be a better match up, and I would say overall performance would in favor of the STI.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
If supras were still being produced, they would probably be making north of 500hp by now
__________________
1987 Honda Accord LX-Dead 1999 Honda Accord EX-L 5 sp-Sold 2006 Subaru WRX Wagon 5sp-Sold 2005 Nissan Frontier ext cab 4x4 4.0L-Sold 2006 Kawasaki Ninja 500r-Sold 2004 Yamaha FZ1 Silver/Black- Sold ![]() 2008 Mazdaspeed 3-In the driveway |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
if u got any doubts about the strength of supra 2jz, go to www.T04R.com , big HP supras, crazy like 900hp on stock block... their manual gearboxes are strong too, but i've heard that the 6 speed is way stronger and is reliable even when u are making 500hp+ at the wheels... yeah
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
How about the mk4(nonturbo) vs. the wrx. Because it seems that the mk4 TT kills the wrx. SO how about the non turbo mk4. And is it cheaper to fix the subaru wrx or supra?
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
WRX would decimate the Non turbo Supra...
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
Quote:
STI WRX is better than or equal to the Supra Twin Turbo Supra Twin Turbo is better than the WRX WRX is better than the Supra Non Turbo |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Toyota Supra (mk4) vs. Subaru Impreza WRX 2004/3
The WRX would do the 0-60 in 5.6 seconds while the Non-turbo Supra (220HP, weight 3500 lbs or so) does it probably in 7.1 seconds...which is right on par w/my 2+2 NA 300ZX
The handling and braking should be similar...I am not sure if they changed the suspension and brakes...seems kinda costly...I have the very similar brakes and suspension to the Twin Turbo 300ZX. I am just carrying the idea over
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|