|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What car is faster? | |||
| 240sx with rb25det |
|
9 | 42.86% |
| stock r32 skyline |
|
12 | 57.14% |
| Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
which would be faster?
me and this dumb kid are having a little dispute... i said that a 240sx with and rb25det would be faster than the r32gtr simply because of the weight differance... what do you guys think?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which would be faster?
240sx, it's lighter
__________________
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: which would be faster?
stock R32, more power, WAY better traction
that is if we are comparing a stock S13 with a STOCK rb25 to a stock GTR, I beliieve the GTR will win. Modded s13 vs stock GTR prolly 240sx, mod for mod GTR..... 280hp with AWD should own a lighter car with 250hp, RWD, open diff, and small ass rear tires. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which would be faster?
It may be a close call... but the GTR would spank 240sx even if it did have an RB25...
__________________
1990 Z32 2+2 BLITZ SUS Intake, HKS ALC My 1994 TT Supra For Sale: http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbul...d.php?t=623105 |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which would be faster?
i am going to have to go with SR20DETpower on this one
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: which would be faster?
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: which would be faster?
Quote:
__________________
My 91 Mr2 Turbo 245rwhp@18psi |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which would be faster?
I am going to have to say that enjuku240sx has to specify exacty what r32 skyline he's talking about
then i vote.
__________________
RX-7 TII |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: which would be faster?
R32 Skyline Gtr He Already Said That.
The Gtr Will Win Hands Down. Its Only 300lbs Heavier Than A S13 W/ Rb25det And With Over 50 More Chp It Will Leave A 240sx No Problem. Plus With Awd Its 60' Will Be Way Better. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which would be faster?
Quote:
Honestly, it would really depend on your driving skills. If we are talking quarter mile acceleration, the 240 definitley has a chance. This is because of the traction system in the GT-R. If a very skilled driver is driving the GT-R, it would probly win. When launching, you have to bring it close to 7000 rpm and drop the clutch...ATESSA-PRO does the rest. A little under the magic number and it bogs, a little over and you get too much wheelspin. But if you can exploit ATESSA-PRO, you can make a GT-R run low 13s stock. If not, it's more like high 13s to low 14s. If you can launch your RB25 240 decently, you should be into 13s. Conclusion: depends on the drivers. If you listen to people who tell you to put in an LSD, clutch, better tires, and a FMIC when you install the RB...you will definitley take the GT-R with some skill.
__________________
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: which would be faster?
a 240sx with rb25det runs a 12.7 in the 1/4mi
dont know what the gtr runs... i think it would be fairly close.
__________________
438whp / 373tq - 11.9 @ 126
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: Re: which would be faster?
sr20detperformance said it right
musicsurfman said it right
__________________
BANNED |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: which would be faster?
We Are Talking Stock For Stock, Correct?
This Means A 240sx With: Open Diff 1.75" Exhuast Rb25det Smic No Bolt-ons The Gtr Will Win Hands Down. The Rb25det Will Be Choking Itself And There Will Be Massive Wheel Hop Like In My Rb20det Powered Car. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which would be faster?
hmm, I thought only the GT R-34's were AWD. I thought the GT R-32's were just RWD.
__________________
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: which would be faster?
Quote:
__________________
BANNED |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|