-
Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Nissan > 240SX | Silvia | 200SX(RWD) | Gazelle | 180SX
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 03-02-2004, 10:18 PM
d4f4stnd4fur1uz d4f4stnd4fur1uz is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
240sx vs. Integra GSR

if these car were to race, which would come out the victor?

both bone stock and manual
__________________
1995 Honda Civic DX (retired and sold)
-Hyper Sports Short Ram w/AEM Filter
-California Products Racing Muffler
-Fogged Up Left Clear Corner
-Keyyed
-Filled holes and painted w/touch up paint
- 105 horsepower, 93 torque?
- fastest ever went: 108 mph
(okay, lets see how fast you'd go in a rickety civic that sounds like it'll explode any second)

1996 Nissan 240SX
-Injen Short Ram
-5 Lug Conversion
-Magnaflow Catback Exhaust with 2.5 in piping
-Short Shifter
(Bought 3/4/04)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2004, 10:26 PM
publicenemy137's Avatar
publicenemy137 publicenemy137 is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,343
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to publicenemy137
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

integra gsr in the 1/4 mile

the 240sx would lead at launch but the integra gsr will catch up when the VTEC kicks in then beats the 240sx
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2004, 10:44 PM
J_Spec_NiTeMaRe's Avatar
J_Spec_NiTeMaRe J_Spec_NiTeMaRe is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 436
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to J_Spec_NiTeMaRe
Assuming that both drivers are equally matched, the Integra will own the 240 all the way down the 1320 from launch to finish.

HOWEVER. A trend I have noticed amongst Acura/Honda drivers is they can't drive for shit. Back when my S14 ran, I brought it to the street races. Iv'e taken Civic Si's, Integra GS-R's, and non VTEC Hondas. Sometimes by alot, sometimes by a nut hair.

On the other hand, Iv'e come across a few VTEC honda/acuras that smoked me cause they CAN drive. Especially this one guy in a Integra Type R. Anyways, the point is that it's all about how skilled you are. It can mean a full second or even more in a 1/4 mile.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2004, 10:56 PM
d4f4stnd4fur1uz d4f4stnd4fur1uz is offline
AF Regular
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

but at least the 240 will win in a drift contest

and with an s15 front end conversion....oh so sexxxy
__________________
1995 Honda Civic DX (retired and sold)
-Hyper Sports Short Ram w/AEM Filter
-California Products Racing Muffler
-Fogged Up Left Clear Corner
-Keyyed
-Filled holes and painted w/touch up paint
- 105 horsepower, 93 torque?
- fastest ever went: 108 mph
(okay, lets see how fast you'd go in a rickety civic that sounds like it'll explode any second)

1996 Nissan 240SX
-Injen Short Ram
-5 Lug Conversion
-Magnaflow Catback Exhaust with 2.5 in piping
-Short Shifter
(Bought 3/4/04)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2004, 11:13 PM
TheLogikal1's Avatar
TheLogikal1 TheLogikal1 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,580
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to TheLogikal1
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

what a ricer...
__________________
1998.5 audi a4 2.8l
5-speed quattro


1994 lexus sc300 (dead)
tein cs
kenwood flip out 7'' screen



1995 Nissan 240sx 5 speed (dead)
GP Sports Spec-D exhaust
Custom Carbon Fiber Intake
17'' ricer wheels in Kumhos




hahaha stole this pose off of koguchi...my shirt makes me look fat...ahaha
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2004, 11:14 PM
nissanfanatic nissanfanatic is offline
240SX Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to nissanfanatic Send a message via AIM to nissanfanatic Send a message via MSN to nissanfanatic Send a message via Yahoo to nissanfanatic
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

The 240 is slower b/c we have a driveshaft and a rearend to turn. the integra also has the advantage of all the weight of the engine and transmission on the front wheels adding traction. The only minus would be the gas tank.

I didnt think i would have to spell it out, man. It goes without saying that the driveshaft is heavy. Heavier stuff is harder to spin than light stuff. It also goes without saying that the differential being separate from the transmission and in a separate housing in the rear adds more weight to an already heavier car.

http://www.acura.com/preowned/pre_modlib_index.asp

1998 Acura Integra

Curb Weight, Manual - GS-R
2672 lbs (1212 kg

Weight Distribution, (%)front/rear - GS-R,GS
64/36


1.8-liter, 4-cylinder, 16-valve DOHC, 140 hp @ 6300 rpm, 124 lbs-ft-torque @ 5200 rpm

www.240sx.org
Car Weights
These are from the "NADA Official Used Car Price Guide"

1990 (SOHC)
Coupe XE - 2657
Fastback SE - 2684

1992 (DOHC)
Coupe - 2699
Fastback - 2730
Coupe SE - 2712
Fastback SE - 2747
Fastback LE - 2748

1994
Convertible - 2870

1995
Coupe - 2815
Coupe SE - 2821

the power is 155HP@5600 and 160ft-lbs at 4400.

you make the decision. I'm not even sure anymore. 240 still kicks ass. FR owns FF any day of the week.

Last edited by nissanfanatic; 03-03-2004 at 09:35 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-02-2004, 11:31 PM
Suislide's Avatar
Suislide Suislide is offline
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLogikal1
what a ricer...

agreed.
__________________
-Brian
2013 Subaru BRZ Sport-Tech 6MT. Not stock.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-02-2004, 11:37 PM
alkemyst alkemyst is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

Quote:
Originally Posted by nissanfanatic
The 240 is slower b/c we have a driveshaft and a rearend. the integra also has the advantage of all the weight of the engine and transmission on the front wheels adding traction. The only minus would be the gas tank.
Why would you think a driveshaft and rearend would slow the 240 down? FWD has way more frictional loss. The difference in weight between a transaxle and a rwd manual + shaft + rearend probably is negligable once drivetrain losses are figured in. [EDIT: NM This I was thinking automatic last night for some reason, however the FF and FR difference here is not why this race is lost]

The traction advantage of a transaxle over the driving wheels also may help, but is hardly the race winner...the momentum of a quick start will probably unload that weight advantage for the first 20 feet or so.

What you have to look at in a drag race (assuming both know what they are doing) is the HP of the GS-R is +15 or so more and having the advantage of being newer usually probably the difference is greater....you also have the fact that the GS-R is about 200lbs lighter as well...this is wear the advantage starts....

Another advantage esp in the drag is with a 7600 peak HP rpm vs the 240's in the upper 5k range you probably have one less shift needed. 0-60 times are about 1 sec off.

Lastly the GS-R is probably geared a bit taller, I think they are in the 4.xx range then usually having taller early gears (since they have the advantage of a almost 2k greater HP peak rpm).

Still the 240SX is a more superior car in my opinion. I have had a 92 style GS-R and liked it, but it had not perception of power and in any tight turn I had to baby the throttle or it would start pushing out.

Å

Last edited by alkemyst; 03-03-2004 at 08:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-03-2004, 06:31 AM
Fliquer Fliquer is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 930
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Fliquer
^ You are mostly right. RWD has a significant advantage during a launch because a great deal of weight is transferred to the rear.

However, RWD cars have more drivetrain loss than FWD cars. This is because there is more mass in a longitudal driveshaft, trany, and differential.
__________________
Isitcontagious.com
'92 S13 coupe
KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs
Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe
Cone Filter
Next up: LSD

RIP #05
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2004, 06:36 AM
SR20DETpower SR20DETpower is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,496
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SR20DETpower
well with most F/R cars they have to spin more heavier things to get the power to the wheels, this makes up for the drivetrain loss. in a FF car they don't have a big drivehsaft or big transmission.

The Differential is built right into the transmission on a FF and the axels split right out from there. Its a much more simplier, cheaper, and easier to build setup thats why most cars are FF today.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-03-2004, 08:36 AM
alkemyst alkemyst is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

edited my post, for some reason I was thinking automatic and not FWD last night
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-11-2004, 06:34 AM
lodownlv lodownlv is offline
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 457
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via AIM to lodownlv Send a message via Yahoo to lodownlv
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

dam that sucks a honda will beet a 240 with what engine a ka24d or a doch ka24de???
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-11-2004, 08:32 AM
musicsurfman musicsurfman is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to musicsurfman Send a message via MSN to musicsurfman
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

Umm The Drivetrain Loss Of Any Honda Is Greater Than 240sxs. The Gsr Has 165hp And Only 115 Of It Hits The Wheels, Thats 50hp. The 240sx Has 160hp And What 120 Of It Hits The Wheels. You Got To Remember Every 90 Degree Turn Power Has To Make Is Equal To 4-5lbs Of Rotational Mass. The Honda Flywheel And Clutch Assembly Is About 30lbs What Does The Ka's Weigh?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-11-2004, 09:37 AM
alkemyst alkemyst is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

those numbers are way off....a manual GSR loses about 15% to the drivetrain. The typical GSR you will meet will be a 94 and later 170HP, not the 160HP 92-93...if you are really unlucky it will be a 97+ Type R pushing 195HP.

The 92-93 should make about 136 at the wheels (these would make for a closer race but are rare to see....)
The 94+ 170HP should be around 145FWHP
The Type R 195HP should be around 166FWHP

But the real story of our loss is in the gearing and RPM advantage the GSR has...they make power up to 8k in the Type R. We have to shift at around 6k and are at less torque efficient gears from the start.

That said....once you start dramatically increasing the power chances are the GSR will not be able to put it all to the ground. On a road course, forget about it the Type R even will have to keep it's power down in twisties or else push out of the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-11-2004, 10:18 AM
musicsurfman musicsurfman is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to musicsurfman Send a message via MSN to musicsurfman
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

Show Me A Dyno Of The 160hp Integra Putting Those Numbers To The Ground. My Friend Is Stock With Just A Cold Air And The Number I Quoted Is The Number He Has On His Dyno Sheet.
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Nissan > 240SX | Silvia | 200SX(RWD) | Gazelle | 180SX


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts