|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
240sx vs. Integra GSR
if these car were to race, which would come out the victor?
both bone stock and manual
__________________
1995 Honda Civic DX (retired and sold) -Hyper Sports Short Ram w/AEM Filter -California Products Racing Muffler -Fogged Up Left Clear Corner -Keyyed -Filled holes and painted w/touch up paint - 105 horsepower, 93 torque? - fastest ever went: 108 mph (okay, lets see how fast you'd go in a rickety civic that sounds like it'll explode any second) 1996 Nissan 240SX -Injen Short Ram -5 Lug Conversion -Magnaflow Catback Exhaust with 2.5 in piping -Short Shifter (Bought 3/4/04) |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
integra gsr in the 1/4 mile
the 240sx would lead at launch but the integra gsr will catch up when the VTEC kicks in then beats the 240sx
__________________
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Assuming that both drivers are equally matched, the Integra will own the 240 all the way down the 1320 from launch to finish.
HOWEVER. A trend I have noticed amongst Acura/Honda drivers is they can't drive for shit. Back when my S14 ran, I brought it to the street races. Iv'e taken Civic Si's, Integra GS-R's, and non VTEC Hondas. Sometimes by alot, sometimes by a nut hair. On the other hand, Iv'e come across a few VTEC honda/acuras that smoked me cause they CAN drive. Especially this one guy in a Integra Type R. Anyways, the point is that it's all about how skilled you are. It can mean a full second or even more in a 1/4 mile.
__________________
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
but at least the 240 will win in a drift contest
![]() and with an s15 front end conversion....oh so sexxxy
__________________
1995 Honda Civic DX (retired and sold) -Hyper Sports Short Ram w/AEM Filter -California Products Racing Muffler -Fogged Up Left Clear Corner -Keyyed -Filled holes and painted w/touch up paint - 105 horsepower, 93 torque? - fastest ever went: 108 mph (okay, lets see how fast you'd go in a rickety civic that sounds like it'll explode any second) 1996 Nissan 240SX -Injen Short Ram -5 Lug Conversion -Magnaflow Catback Exhaust with 2.5 in piping -Short Shifter (Bought 3/4/04) |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
what a ricer...
__________________
1998.5 audi a4 2.8l 5-speed quattro 1994 lexus sc300 (dead) tein cs kenwood flip out 7'' screen 1995 Nissan 240sx 5 speed (dead) GP Sports Spec-D exhaust Custom Carbon Fiber Intake 17'' ricer wheels in Kumhos hahaha stole this pose off of koguchi...my shirt makes me look fat...ahaha |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
The 240 is slower b/c we have a driveshaft and a rearend to turn. the integra also has the advantage of all the weight of the engine and transmission on the front wheels adding traction. The only minus would be the gas tank.
I didnt think i would have to spell it out, man. It goes without saying that the driveshaft is heavy. Heavier stuff is harder to spin than light stuff. It also goes without saying that the differential being separate from the transmission and in a separate housing in the rear adds more weight to an already heavier car. http://www.acura.com/preowned/pre_modlib_index.asp 1998 Acura Integra Curb Weight, Manual - GS-R 2672 lbs (1212 kg Weight Distribution, (%)front/rear - GS-R,GS 64/36 1.8-liter, 4-cylinder, 16-valve DOHC, 140 hp @ 6300 rpm, 124 lbs-ft-torque @ 5200 rpm www.240sx.org Car Weights These are from the "NADA Official Used Car Price Guide" 1990 (SOHC) Coupe XE - 2657 Fastback SE - 2684 1992 (DOHC) Coupe - 2699 Fastback - 2730 Coupe SE - 2712 Fastback SE - 2747 Fastback LE - 2748 1994 Convertible - 2870 1995 Coupe - 2815 Coupe SE - 2821 the power is 155HP@5600 and 160ft-lbs at 4400. you make the decision. I'm not even sure anymore. 240 still kicks ass. FR owns FF any day of the week. Last edited by nissanfanatic; 03-03-2004 at 09:35 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
Quote:
agreed.
__________________
-Brian 2013 Subaru BRZ Sport-Tech 6MT. Not stock. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
Quote:
The traction advantage of a transaxle over the driving wheels also may help, but is hardly the race winner...the momentum of a quick start will probably unload that weight advantage for the first 20 feet or so. What you have to look at in a drag race (assuming both know what they are doing) is the HP of the GS-R is +15 or so more and having the advantage of being newer usually probably the difference is greater....you also have the fact that the GS-R is about 200lbs lighter as well...this is wear the advantage starts.... Another advantage esp in the drag is with a 7600 peak HP rpm vs the 240's in the upper 5k range you probably have one less shift needed. 0-60 times are about 1 sec off. Lastly the GS-R is probably geared a bit taller, I think they are in the 4.xx range then usually having taller early gears (since they have the advantage of a almost 2k greater HP peak rpm). Still the 240SX is a more superior car in my opinion. I have had a 92 style GS-R and liked it, but it had not perception of power and in any tight turn I had to baby the throttle or it would start pushing out. Å Last edited by alkemyst; 03-03-2004 at 08:36 AM. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
^ You are mostly right. RWD has a significant advantage during a launch because a great deal of weight is transferred to the rear.
However, RWD cars have more drivetrain loss than FWD cars. This is because there is more mass in a longitudal driveshaft, trany, and differential.
__________________
Isitcontagious.com '92 S13 coupe KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe Cone Filter Next up: LSD RIP #05
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
well with most F/R cars they have to spin more heavier things to get the power to the wheels, this makes up for the drivetrain loss. in a FF car they don't have a big drivehsaft or big transmission.
The Differential is built right into the transmission on a FF and the axels split right out from there. Its a much more simplier, cheaper, and easier to build setup thats why most cars are FF today. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
edited my post, for some reason I was thinking automatic and not FWD last night
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
dam that sucks a honda will beet a 240 with what engine a ka24d or a doch ka24de???
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
Umm The Drivetrain Loss Of Any Honda Is Greater Than 240sxs. The Gsr Has 165hp And Only 115 Of It Hits The Wheels, Thats 50hp. The 240sx Has 160hp And What 120 Of It Hits The Wheels. You Got To Remember Every 90 Degree Turn Power Has To Make Is Equal To 4-5lbs Of Rotational Mass. The Honda Flywheel And Clutch Assembly Is About 30lbs What Does The Ka's Weigh?
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
those numbers are way off....a manual GSR loses about 15% to the drivetrain. The typical GSR you will meet will be a 94 and later 170HP, not the 160HP 92-93...if you are really unlucky it will be a 97+ Type R pushing 195HP.
The 92-93 should make about 136 at the wheels (these would make for a closer race but are rare to see....) The 94+ 170HP should be around 145FWHP The Type R 195HP should be around 166FWHP But the real story of our loss is in the gearing and RPM advantage the GSR has...they make power up to 8k in the Type R. We have to shift at around 6k and are at less torque efficient gears from the start. That said....once you start dramatically increasing the power chances are the GSR will not be able to put it all to the ground. On a road course, forget about it the Type R even will have to keep it's power down in twisties or else push out of the turn. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR
Show Me A Dyno Of The 160hp Integra Putting Those Numbers To The Ground. My Friend Is Stock With Just A Cold Air And The Number I Quoted Is The Number He Has On His Dyno Sheet.
|
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|