bmw m3 vs. chevy corvette (moved from M3 forum)

[FYRHWK1]

Fair enough, GM is larger and should do it for less money, price is still a factor though, otherwise we'd all be running around in supercars. Preference is definitly a personal issue, my mistake, I must have missed that part. Each person likes what they will and thats their right, all I'm saying (though it didn't come off like that) is that the Z06 can do it.

As for wet racing, well I'll stick to drier tracks thank you I prefer not sliding off the track thank you

[c51978]

Originally Posted by gang$tarr

If it's a C5 vette than i wouldn't even think about it, I'd go straight for the M3.... the C5 (regular corvette) does 0-60mph in the mid 5 second range while the M3 does it in the upper 4 second range, plus the M3 has way more room, luxury and utility, since it has a back seat and can seat 5 people... or 4 adults comfortably..... while the corvette only has 2 seats

IT LOOKS LIKE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, C5 IS NOT MID 5'S 0-60.......C5 0-60 IN 4.72 SEC (CARANDDRIVER) BMW M3 0-60 4.8 SEC I LOVE THE BMW M3 BUT I DON'T THINK THE M3 SHOULD COMPARE WITH THE VETTE, THE VETTE WOULD SIMPLY SPANK IT ALL THE WAY ARROUND. AS A METTER OF FACT I RACED AN M3 WITH MY WS6 TRANS AM AT A TRAFFIC LIGHT AND I WAS ALL THE TIME IN FRON OF HIM(ABOUT 2 CARS IN FRONT) SO I CAN NOT IMAGINE WHAT A C5 WOULD DO TO AN M3. MAKE YOUR STORY STRAIGHT AND THE ONLY WAY YOU WOULD BEAT A VETTE IS IF THE VETTE DRIVER IS REALLY A BAD DRIVER, BECAUSE EVEN IF HE WAS A DEASNT DRIVER YOU WOULD HAVE A HARD TIME KEEPING UP WITH HIM.

I AM SO SORRY FOR YOU.

[Neutrino]

YaY another old thread revived.



CLOSED

[crayzayjay]

IAL

Dammit!!

Read this, newbie, take off the caps lock, and tone down the attitude plz