|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
01-16-2001, 01:14 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Okay, just a quick question. Maybe it's a little strange but...
What's the deal with 64 impalas? I mean, you hear a lot of rappers talking about their impalas, and it seems like they're always 64's. I was just wondering what the deal is with this year? For impalas, and any car for that matter. 1964  
__________________
I've said it before, I'll say it again. "Nobody does rip and snort like Ferrari" 
|
|
#2
01-16-2001, 06:41 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't know what's the deal with the '64, but it is a safe bet it was fast.
I kind of doubt this, but an Automobile Magazine (perhaps Motor Trend) reviewed the 1960 Impala SS, and reported a 0-60 time of 4.0 seconds!! Obviously either a typo, as nothing (certainly not of stock production class) went that fast 40 years ago, or this thing was putting down some serious power, considering the amount of mass it had to move. I would think that these stats would be widespread bragging material, and yet i've hardly ever heard a peep about them, so it's probably misinformation.. but then again you never know.....
|
|
#3
02-26-2001, 01:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The deal is, they look cool! Although those pics aren't very good examples.
The highest spec cars were pretty fast.
|
|
#5
10-19-2001, 09:53 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Basically they make the best lowriders. I prefer the 65 impalas though. A lot of west coast kats be rocking them. Once you put the hydraulics on 'em, they become very entertaining.
*Hit the switch and get's three wheel motion* Not a '64 but, Oh Well!! 
__________________
Why do banks charge you a "non-sufficient funds fee" on money they already know you don't have? 
|
|
#6
02-05-2002, 05:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
c
__________________
a cavalier raised by euros can only cause more trouble >CAVALIEREUROSTYLES<
|
|
#7
03-23-2002, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
This Is Why....
It's just a cool car, by the way, this one is mine!!
__________________
'02 Impala LS Black, Med Grey Leather Buckets Ventvisors, Custom Taillight Treatment, Custom Carbon Fiber Bowtie Insert In Process: "SS" Conversion Monte Carlo SS Emblems Coming Soon: Purple Undercar Neon Kenwood 10" Dual Bandpass Box Kenwood 500watt Amp Kenwood XM Receiver http://hometown.aol.com/impala2k2ls/index.html
|
|
#8
12-11-2002, 07:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
The 1964 Impala is proper, thats why its the most popular lowrider. The worlds most famous Lowrider is a 1964 Impala, but I can't find any pictures of it, these are only select few from my lowrider library. The last two pictures aren't 64s but they still have the same main body shape, just there for an idea.
  
|
|
#9
05-27-2003, 09:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Here's s better example
I hope this is a better example. This is my daily driver 1962 impala with 77K miles. Dropped 2 inches, 18's and 20's. Solid and clean. More to come soon!
__________________
No Bags, No switches, No fat B***h's!!!
|
|
#10
06-05-2003, 12:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
61-64 Impalas are more sought after for lowriding for several reasons...
1. Very big trunks to put hydraulic pumps and Batteries 2. Very sturdy frame...Little reinforcement is needed unless 3 wheeling and hopping are in your plans 3. Traditionally, they have been rolling impalas in the bigger car clubs in Cali since the 70's Here is a link to my 63 I recently sold not too long ago: http://www.layitlow.com/members/UCYI3WL/
__________________
UnitedridaZ CC www.unitedridaz.org 
|
|
#11
08-16-2003, 10:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 64 impala
Quote:
 That Impala had potential, I would of kept it  More Impalas that make nice Lowriders are the 67-70 years.
|
|
#12
08-20-2003, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
i don't believe you don't know the deal with 64 impala's they are the best car's that were ver made in my opinion. and the rappers, like them because of the way that tey look when they are lowered. and the size of engine that they have doesn't hurt.
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
