|
|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: which would you rahter have? | |||
| SR |
|
33 | 67.35% |
| KA |
|
16 | 32.65% |
| Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#91
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reliability/Longer Lasting
So which one would be more reliable/Longer Lasting? The SR or KA?
__________________
"Everyone wants to see me throw a fireball, but thats not right not in real life..." 1996 Honda Accord Sedan EX 1of9 |
|
#92
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Reliability/Longer Lasting
Quote:
it depends on what you use the engine for, how hard you push it, and what mods you make to it. if you have a 400hp KA that you use on the track every weekend and push it to it's limits, it'll obviousley break earlier then a 200hp SR that you only use on the track once a month. it all depends on the conditions.
__________________
-Brian 2013 Subaru BRZ Sport-Tech 6MT. Not stock. |
|
#93
|
||||
|
||||
|
Uhm, NO. When you rebuild an engine to stock specs, you bring it back to STOCK specs. You dont GAIN 10% in power, you just get back all that power that you didnt have due to worn components, poor compression, etc. That means if your motor used to produce 150HP, and your motor is worn and only producing 130.. you should expect to produce 150 again, once your motor is rebuilt.
Quote:
|
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
|
All of the 240's that i have seen for sale lately have had well ove 100k miles. And doing a turbo upgrade is not the best idea for high mileage, so if I were to pick between the 2 for a swap, I would go with the sr20det due to the fact that i am a jdm freak and i like the silvia approach.
|
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
|
KA...cuz when i blow my motor i can buy another off you SR guys.
__________________
-cuz it's there |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|