![]() |
![]() |
Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
View Poll Results: Which would you want? | |||
2001 BMW M3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 29.73% |
2001 Chevrolet Corvette ZO6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 45.95% |
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 24.32% |
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#61 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: The King for under $40,000
0-60 is a crappy measurement.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | ||
Here for the pussy, man.
![]() |
Re: Re: The King for under $40,000
Quote:
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo ![]() 2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | ||
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: The King for under $40,000
in refference to your comment about 0-60 times:
Quote:
i differ in opinion on this one... i personally believe the quater mile is a much more informative, impressive, and a better guide than a 0-60 time. 1. it shows an entire power span, though most of the gears. 0-60 in a lot of cases shows us 1st and 2nd gear, sometimes third. i want to see how it performs past the speed limit. 2. if you were in a street race, are you really going to stop at 60 mph. no, you'll prolly go well into 100, at least i do. 3. a car may be faster 0-60, but get spanked on it's way to 90. my 93 prelude ssr, is a lot lot faster in it's high end, than low end. anyhow, i would like to hear you're reasoning on this. you may have a good point, i'll keep an open mind. oh and not to be completely off topic. i'd take a wrx sti over all three of those cars. they are good cars, but i've never driven a vehicle that handles like a sti. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | ||
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: The King for under $40,000
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | ||
AF Enthusiast
![]() Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The King for under $40,000
Quote:
sorry, i was completely unaware of that. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: The King for under $40,000
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: The King for under $40,000
That's all I was trying to point out, 0-60 is really just a number for manufactuer's to use to sell cars... who cares how quick you can merge on a highway, exactly, everyone wants to know how fast a car is in the quarter.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
AF Enthusiast
![]() |
As far as these three cars would go I would rank the Z06 just barely over the M3. If I lived in Europe my vote may have swayed the other way considering that the price of the Vette and availability could be different. As far as the MR goes, their just isn't enough information on the US based model to place it anywhere amongst the Z06/M3. I'm not doubting its capabilities in any way, so I'm not going to underestimate/overestimate this car against the two in the comparsion. Put this thread back in action when the MR is out, and their will be a lot more opinions and objective data to make a better judgement.
As far as the 0-60/1/4. debate goes, think of regular people that just buy cars. You won't actually be going 100mph regularly in daily commute. 0-60 times sell to the average car buyer. Now if your looking at it in a all out performance aspect I then see why a quarter mile time will invoke more interest. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|