Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
View Poll Results: Which would you want?
2001 BMW M3 11 29.73%
2001 Chevrolet Corvette ZO6 17 45.95%
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution MR 9 24.32%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-31-2004, 02:22 AM   #61
Joseph1082
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lindenhurst, New York
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Joseph1082
Re: The King for under $40,000

0-60 is a crappy measurement.
Joseph1082 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2004, 05:15 AM   #62
Jimster
Here for the pussy, man.
 
Jimster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Auckland
Posts: 11,879
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Jimster Send a message via AIM to Jimster Send a message via Yahoo to Jimster
Re: Re: The King for under $40,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseph1082
0-60 is a crappy measurement.
No it isn't, it's a etter guide for a comparison than a Quarter mile i.e. It can be applied to a lot of things, not just a trivial matter.
__________________
Check out my Pride and joy in AF- and discuss your favourite Alfa Romeo

2007 Audi A4 3.0 TDI Le Mans
Jimster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2004, 11:23 AM   #63
dbebesi
AF Enthusiast
 
dbebesi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: The King for under $40,000

in refference to your comment about 0-60 times:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimster
No it isn't, it's a etter guide for a comparison than a Quarter mile i.e. It can be applied to a lot of things, not just a trivial matter.

i differ in opinion on this one... i personally believe the quater mile is a much more informative, impressive, and a better guide than a 0-60 time.

1. it shows an entire power span, though most of the gears. 0-60 in a lot of cases shows us 1st and 2nd gear, sometimes third. i want to see how it performs past the speed limit.

2. if you were in a street race, are you really going to stop at 60 mph. no, you'll prolly go well into 100, at least i do.

3. a car may be faster 0-60, but get spanked on it's way to 90. my 93 prelude ssr, is a lot lot faster in it's high end, than low end.


anyhow, i would like to hear you're reasoning on this. you may have a good point, i'll keep an open mind.


oh and not to be completely off topic. i'd take a wrx sti over all three of those cars. they are good cars, but i've never driven a vehicle that handles like a sti.
dbebesi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2004, 11:53 AM   #64
3000ways
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Diamond Bar, California
Posts: 532
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: The King for under $40,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbebesi

oh and not to be completely off topic. i'd take a wrx sti over all three of those cars. they are good cars, but i've never driven a vehicle that handles like a sti.
Then you have never driven an EVO, same thing just handles better, and the EVO MR handles better than the base EVO. The STI was out voted by the EVO MR in a previous thread, that is why it is not in this comparison.
3000ways is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2004, 04:36 PM   #65
dbebesi
AF Enthusiast
 
dbebesi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 566
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The King for under $40,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3000ways
The STI was out voted by the EVO MR in a previous thread, that is why it is not in this comparison.

sorry, i was completely unaware of that.
dbebesi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2004, 07:29 PM   #66
Mr Payne
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 239
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: Re: Re: The King for under $40,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbebesi
in refference to your comment about 0-60 times:



i differ in opinion on this one... i personally believe the quater mile is a much more informative, impressive, and a better guide than a 0-60 time.

1. it shows an entire power span, though most of the gears. 0-60 in a lot of cases shows us 1st and 2nd gear, sometimes third. i want to see how it performs past the speed limit.

2. if you were in a street race, are you really going to stop at 60 mph. no, you'll prolly go well into 100, at least i do.

3. a car may be faster 0-60, but get spanked on it's way to 90. my 93 prelude ssr, is a lot lot faster in it's high end, than low end.


anyhow, i would like to hear you're reasoning on this. you may have a good point, i'll keep an open mind.


oh and not to be completely off topic. i'd take a wrx sti over all three of those cars. they are good cars, but i've never driven a vehicle that handles like a sti.
I agree the 0-60 measurement is not as useful as the 1/4 mile measurement (ET&Trap Speed).
Mr Payne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2004, 10:14 PM   #67
Joseph1082
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lindenhurst, New York
Posts: 1,392
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Joseph1082
Re: The King for under $40,000

That's all I was trying to point out, 0-60 is really just a number for manufactuer's to use to sell cars... who cares how quick you can merge on a highway, exactly, everyone wants to know how fast a car is in the quarter.
Joseph1082 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2004, 01:10 AM   #68
Kurtdg19
AF Enthusiast
 
Kurtdg19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Posts: 739
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to Kurtdg19
As far as these three cars would go I would rank the Z06 just barely over the M3. If I lived in Europe my vote may have swayed the other way considering that the price of the Vette and availability could be different. As far as the MR goes, their just isn't enough information on the US based model to place it anywhere amongst the Z06/M3. I'm not doubting its capabilities in any way, so I'm not going to underestimate/overestimate this car against the two in the comparsion. Put this thread back in action when the MR is out, and their will be a lot more opinions and objective data to make a better judgement.

As far as the 0-60/1/4. debate goes, think of regular people that just buy cars. You won't actually be going 100mph regularly in daily commute. 0-60 times sell to the average car buyer. Now if your looking at it in a all out performance aspect I then see why a quarter mile time will invoke more interest.
Kurtdg19 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts