Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys

Stop Feeding Overpriced Junk to Your Dogs!

GET HEALTHY AFFORDABLE DOG FOOD
DEVELOPED BY THE AUTOMOTIVEFORUMS.COM FOUNDER & THE TOP AMERICAN BULLDOG BREEDER IN THE WORLD THROUGH DECADES OF EXPERIENCE. WE KNOW DOGS.
CONSUMED BY HUNDREDS OF GRAND FUTURE AMERICAN BULLDOGS FOR YEARS.
NOW AVAILABLE TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC FOR THE FIRST TIME
PROPER NUTRITION FOR ALL BREEDS & AGES
TRY GRAND FUTURE AIR DRIED BEEF DOG FOOD
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Engineering/Technical Ask technical questions about cars. Do you know how a car engine works?
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2005, 06:27 PM   #1
Automobile Maniac
AF Enthusiast
 
Automobile Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 147
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What exactly happened

After 1971 engines pretty much turned into garbage. What specifically on the motor made the power drop? I hear all the time people saying "smog equipment" what the hell do they mean exactly?

For example:

1971 corvette LS5 454 V8 365 bhp
1972 corvette LS5 454 V8 270 bhp

What parts are draining this much power???
Can't you just remove these parts and make the motor have exactly as much power as the years before???

Thanks for any help
__________________
Automobile Maniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2005, 07:08 PM   #2
71Cnet
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: foxboro, Massachusetts
Posts: 90
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What exactly happened

engine designs also changed. different internal components were used also. like different pistons push rods even the heads, intakes and exhaust manifolds. compresion ratios changed. it really has nothing to do with the emisions stuff.
__________________
So how many chevy's and ford's does it take to beat a MOPAR? The world will never know!
71Cnet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2005, 11:31 PM   #3
Madcat455
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cape Coral, Florida
Posts: 344
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Didn't they also switch from a Gross HP measurment to a NET HP measurement??? Or was that later on??
Madcat455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2005, 12:28 AM   #4
PeteRR
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: S. Jersey, New Jersey
Posts: 155
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lower compression was the biggest reason for the drop from '71 to '72, at least for Mopars. One of the performance Dodge dealerships, Grand Spaulding Dodge, tried to get around it by offering as an option a Paxton Supercharger to get the HP back in the 340 SB. It was known as a GSS. The Feds shot that down after '72.
__________________
Pete.

1968 Plymouth Road Runner
451 Stroker + Keisler 5-Speed OD manual trans
PeteRR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2005, 04:39 PM   #5
MagicRat
Nothing scares me anymore
 
MagicRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: City of Light
Posts: 10,702
Thanks: 12
Thanked 82 Times in 77 Posts
Re: What exactly happened

Quote:
Originally Posted by Madcat455
Didn't they also switch from a Gross HP measurment to a NET HP measurement??? Or was that later on??
Madcat is correct, the measurement changed, mostly in 1971, I believe. This change alone usually cut the HP numbers by approx. 30%, without actually changine the engine at all.
Furthermore, the old 'gross' measurement was notoriously inconsistent.
There are many examples where gross power figures just did not add up, given the equipment used. (We all have heard stories how they did so to 'fool' the insurance companies and/or senior management at the car manufacturer)

For example the plain jane '68 429 v8 4bbl was rated at 360 hp.
The Cobra Jet option, with better heads, manifolds, bigger cam and more compression was rated at 370 hp. Now there is no way that all those excellent high performance parts just got 10 more hp. You could get 10 more hp out of a base 429 just by flipping the lid on the air cleaner.
Furthermore the 'Drag Pack' Super Cobra Jet, (pretty much a race only option) was rated at only 375 HP. Its true output was more like 450.

Other reasons for the reduction........

Compression ratios, as mentioned earlier were dropped. This allows the engines to run better on unleaded and also reduced the NOX emissions.

Cam shafts and Cam timing.......most of the more radical cam shafts were eliminated. Also, a trick that just about everyone used was to retard the cam shaft timing a few degrees. This reduced power, but helped clean up emissions.

For example, the ford 460 4bbl used in Lincolns was rated at 365 hp from '68 through '70. But through '72 to '79, it was rated at 208 to 212 hp.....and it was the SAME engine as the 365 hp version. If you drive them back to back, (I have) they 'feel' almost identical.
The only difference was a 2 point cut in compression, adding an EGR valve and retarding the camshaft timing 4 degrees.

Therefore, 2 modest engine tuning changes, an EGR valve and using a different rating system lost 153 hp......on paper, but only about 25 hp in reality.
MagicRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2005, 07:27 PM   #6
GTStang
Stang Guy
 
GTStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTStang
Like everyone said it is "smog equipment" in a way but more trying to meet new smog/mpg laws through cam retarding, CR drop through less stroke/bigger CC heads/ and different pistons the big 3 used all of these to lower emission but HP drops also came.
__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world
has lost one of the truly wonderful people...

GTStang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2005, 12:20 PM   #7
swi66
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Gasport, New York
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
horsepower

Speaking as a guy who remembers it well. It was not only the government and emissions.
It was the insurance companies as well. Huge tariffs on cubic inches as far as costs of policies. Car companies wanted to "under-rate" the actual horsepower as who would buy a car you couldn't insure. And shortly thereafter costs of gas skyrocketed, further causing the car companies to tone it down so they could sell cars..............

Could you imagine if insurance companies, the government, and the oil companies didn't due what they did! We'd all be driving 1000 horsepower cars...............

swi66
swi66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2005, 12:35 PM   #8
terzmo
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 57
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: What exactly happened

H.P doesn't seem to be a factor now ??? 500 hp corvettes....over 300 on alot of other models....what excuse will they use ???
terzmo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Engineering/Technical


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts