 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
 | | ||
| |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
07-05-2002, 12:20 AM
|
#1 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 284
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
944 vs. SER Spec V
Just wondering how they match up i have a spec v and a relative has a 944. I hear there both running low to mid 15's in the 1/4 and low 7's high 6's in 0-60.
Anyone know how they compare. |
|
|
|
|
07-06-2002, 11:56 PM
|
#2 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 328
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
depends on if its a
944 86-88.5 944 Turbo 88.5-91 944 Turbo 86-91 944 Turbo S ?
__________________
Reefer Does Me |
|
|
|
|
|
07-07-2002, 12:39 AM
|
#3 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 284
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Nah its ont a turbo at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
07-12-2002, 03:53 AM
|
#4 | |
|
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Courtenay
Posts: 3,892
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Also the Turbo S was only made in 88. The Nissan has TCS, doesn't it? An inept driver would do better with the SER. They are both about the same weight, the SER Spec V has 175 hp from the QR motor, and the 944 has what, 160 something? The 944 has better potential, it can lose more weight than the Spec V. Also, it has the inherent advantage of RWD
__________________
 Connor - Porsche Nazi since 2001, VW defiler since 2004  This here's a Fabrication forum!  My lugnut requires more torque than your LS1 makes. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-21-2002, 07:42 PM
|
#5 | ||
|
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,839
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 944 vs. SER Spec V
Quote:
The 944 and the original (classic) Sentra SE-R are pretty equivilent. The Spec V is mighty good. With the ATB differential it really kicks ass on road courses. At the SE-R National Convention in Phoenix this year the Spec V was impressing everyone. You should join the SE-R Mailing List if you have not already.
__________________
George Roffe Houston, Texas USA 00 328i 91 SE-R (well modded) 84 944 SCCA ITS race car under construction "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and filled him with a great resolve" -- Admiral Yamamoto, December 7, 1941 |
||
|
|
|
|
07-21-2002, 11:53 PM
|
#6 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 328
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thats wrong
The Turbo S was made from '87-91 and had 250 hp 0-60 in 5.5 and topped out at 162
__________________
Reefer Does Me |
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2002, 02:55 PM
|
#7 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hp in a 944S
Sorry to break your heart but the type S didnt have that much horse. read the specs-
Engine: Bore - 100 mm Stroke - 78.9 Disp - 2479 cc Compression - 10.9:1 HP - 190 @ 6000 RPM TQ - 170lb/ft @ 4300 RPM Weight - 2825 lbs Total Produced - 1987 - 3,066 1988 - 511
__________________
Drive faster, drive harder |
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2002, 06:02 PM
|
#8 | |
|
AF Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
sorry
Sorry.. the turbo S had 245 hp. i was thinking about the Type S made in 87-88
__________________
Drive faster, drive harder |
|
|
|
|
|
08-13-2002, 07:57 PM
|
#9 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 328
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
cool thing is on an turbo s
for about $5k (us) into huntley racing products you can shoot hp well into the 400's
__________________
Reefer Does Me |
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2002, 09:28 AM
|
#10 | |
|
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Courtenay
Posts: 3,892
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Actually, the Turbo S was only in 88, the 89-91 951s although identical to the 88 TS, were not considered S's. It all comes from the Porsche tradition of offering preproduction technology in a limited run of cars.
In late 87, they already had all of the updates for the 951 worked out, but were not ready to do full scale production of the reworked 951, so they made a thousand S models, with the 245 hp, K26/#8, LSD, M030... The things that defined the 88S as seperate from the 88 951 were all standard in the 89-91 951, and they dropped the S designation. Another useless bit of Porsche trivia! http://vista.pca.org/stl/944turbo.htm
__________________
Connor - Porsche Nazi since 2001, VW defiler since 2004 This here's a Fabrication forum! My lugnut requires more torque than your LS1 makes. |
|
|
|
|
|
08-21-2002, 12:29 PM
|
#11 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 328
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
which also reminds me
THE 951 S IS MY DREAM CAR! maybe by christmas with a lil luck! 
__________________
Reefer Does Me |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
