|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Quality Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
|||||||
| Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
| View Poll Results: Do you like the Cadillac CTS | |||
| Yes, I love it... |
|
7 | 43.75% |
| No, I hate it... |
|
9 | 56.25% |
| Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page |
Subscribe to this Thread
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
AF Fanatic
![]() |
Cadillac CTS (Love it/Hate it?)
The new Cadillac CTS...opinions?
http://www.supercars.net/cars/2003@$Cadillac@$CTS.html Personally I dont like it...styling is a bit off for me. edit by jay: fixed link Last edited by Jay!; 07-02-2002 at 08:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
móddə rąytər
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: idon'twantto
Posts: 3,325
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
that thing's uglier than the aztec. what's with GM's design teams? it has no luxurious, elegant lines to it whatsoever. underneath may be a different story but i'm far from impressed by its looks. especially the tail end. i'm not a big fan of lincoln's ls but i'd rather be seen in it than the CTS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
AF Newbie
|
its looked decent in the magazines but i saw one the other day in person and it freakin sucked..i absolutley do not like it....my favorite caddy is the seville sts..those are sweet as hell
:bonghitte :ylsuper
__________________
Rss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 137
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I like the looks of it. Well not really, but I like it better than most cars looks. It's refreashing IMHO. I'll vomit if I see another Accord, Camry etc. Besides the looks, I love it. Most reviewers agree it has great engineering. It's a fun one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
AF Fanatic
![]() |
Underneath...it has 220HP V6 RWD...nothing spectacular. And add in the weight of the car and all the luxurious stuff in it...it's probably a slow POS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Acutally they arent slow they get 0 to 60 in about 7.0 seconds
Ive read, I think they are kinda neat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Funding the welfare state
![]() |
I dont think it looks all that bad. Its nowhere as bad as the Azcrap (as said earlier), but GM sure does have some issues in the styling department.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!
__________________
Resistance Is Futile (If < 1ohm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Macadamia Nut Cookies
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have to agree it does lack in the looks deparment. But i love the way the lincoln's ls. That shit is sweet!!
__________________
"Fear is the path to the Dark Side..., Fear leads to Anger, Anger leads to Hate, Hate leads to Suffering " -Yoda |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
Its a step in the right direction for caddillac in terms of styling and performance. The CTS can hang with any euro sport sedan (of similar pricing).
__________________
Isitcontagious.com '92 S13 coupe KYB adjustable struts + Whiteline springs Urethane bushings in all control arms and subframe Cone Filter Next up: LSD RIP #05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Its a very nice car, looked at one the other day, fast, and very
sporty for a Cadillac. Its got to be about the best they have made so far, for the money. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
The Red Baron
![]() |
It's an all around good car, but GM just isn't making the best looking cars these days including the CTS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
|
I personally like the Ext. Styling, but of course in this
market segment, i dont believe i would be purchasing anything but a Bavarian Auto
__________________
Reefer Does Me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 156
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yea.... I say its a decent car for its class.
__________________
Hamann 2001 E46 M3 Laguna Seca 2 357.9 kw / 479.9 bhp @ 5400 rpm 312 kph / 193.9 mph 0-60 : 4.2 seconds Would I kill a man for it? You know it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
AF Fanatic
|
This is a tough one, lets just say, I like it, but I will never love it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 278
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I personally like the way it looks, but i don't like the specs.....yet.......next year, or the year after they are gonna put way more horses under the hood....and i mean way more...they might even offer a huge V8....like 5.8L or something........and with the comments about GM's styling.....just wait until next year, or the year after...they are redesigning a lot of their cars, such as the Grand Am, Grand Prix, Bonneville, Sunfire, Cavalier, etc....giving them more power, and better looks. Also, they are introducing alot of nice, nice new cars, like the Solstice, or something like that...can't quite remember the name right now...
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
![]() |
|
|