-
Grand Future Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food
Air Dried Dog Food | Fresh Beef

Carnivore Diet for Dogs

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk
Register FAQ Community
Reply Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-18-2004, 04:44 PM
351wStang's Avatar
351wStang 351wStang is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,271
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Modulars

Why such a difference in performance between 2v and 4v? What makes 4 small valves better than 2 big valves? Accuracy?
Why are the 2v and 4v blocks different? What is different about them?
What makes mod motors respond so well to FI?
How do mod motors make so much power with stock cams? Does this have something to do with the difference between 2v and 4v? Do cams have that little of an affect on mods?
What cars had/have the 4v motor?
Can a mod motor be built N/A to stand up to a N/A pushrod motor (5.0)?
Do mod motors respond better to boost/n20 than pushrods motors?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-18-2004, 04:55 PM
StangNut86 StangNut86 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,078
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to StangNut86 Send a message via Yahoo to StangNut86
actually, 2 big valves is better than several smaller ones, for flow reasons. you won't see many guys running an overhead cam motor running sub 8 second ETs, but all the top classes use OHV. the big advantage of an overhead cam motor is how huge the ports can be, since there's no need to create space for pushrods. if you ask me, DOHC is kind of a gimmic anyway.

2v and 4v blocks aren't any different from each other... it's all in the heads. they call them 'modular' for that reason.

mod motors respond to efi because they were designed with its flow characteristics in mind, whereas windsors were designed before EFIs time.

most guys running stock cams on a mod are also running roller followers with higher ratios, which makes a huge difference in flow and powerband.

high-end lincolns and mercuries, '99-04 cobras, and some trucks have 4v motors.

mod motors can do anything a 5.0 can, just depends on how deep your pockets are.

not really.

hope that helps.
__________________
-Andy

'89 Mustang 5.0 - How fast? i'll know this weekend.
'86 Mustang LX - Shortblock is built, now for the rest of it.

"Put the subject before the verb, hmm? Fail this class, you will."
-Yoda teaches english class.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-18-2004, 05:18 PM
351wStang's Avatar
351wStang 351wStang is offline
AF Enthusiast
Thread starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,271
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modulars

Thanks, but I meant FI as in Forced Induction, not EFI Electronic Fuel Injection.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-18-2004, 08:14 PM
boosted331 boosted331 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,132
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Modulars

Quote:
Originally Posted by StangNut86
actually, 2 big valves is better than several smaller ones, for flow reasons. you won't see many guys running an overhead cam motor running sub 8 second ETs, but all the top classes use OHV. the big advantage of an overhead cam motor is how huge the ports can be, since there's no need to create space for pushrods. if you ask me, DOHC is kind of a gimmic anyway.
4 Valve motors produce tons of port swirl and flow massive amounts of air at low lift. You can flow just as good if not better than a head with 2 valves, but you keep the port velocity much higher running the 4 smaller valves and it's easier to put together a high flowing head on a small bore motor.

Do you honestly think that the cars do not run 4V heads because they are inferior to 2V pushrod motors, or do you think that they don't run 4V OHC heads because class sanctioning prevents them from running them, as well as the massive cost of building an entirely big block engine from scratch with a set of custom one off heads?

The reason there is such a performance difference between the 2V and 4V modular cars is since the 4.6 runs such a piss-ant 3.55 inch bore it is hard to get 2 big valves in there, and it's hard to get them to flow well. They come with small valves, so the heads do not flow very well. Even full ported most 2V heads are cracking 200-215 CFM's, whereas a well ported 2V head for a 5.0 with 2.02/1.60 valves will usually flow in the 300-330 CFM range.

IMHO, mod motors take boost much better than the old pushrod cars. For 550+ RWHP out of a 5.0 you need 2000+ dollars for a new 4-bolt block. For 550+ RWHP out of a 4.6 you need new pistons and rods, and a cobra crank if it's a 2V. For 4.6 heads you need to drop some cash to port them, stock 4V heads will flow 320+ CFM. For 5.0's you are going to drop 2000+ dollars for a set of heads that flow 320+ CFM's. 4.6's can spin to the moon, so even with less torque they can make more horsepower.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2004, 12:22 AM
flex339's Avatar
flex339 flex339 is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 520
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to flex339
Re: Modulars

Quote:
Originally Posted by 351wStang
Why such a difference in performance between 2v and 4v? What makes 4 small valves better than 2 big valves? Accuracy?
Why are the 2v and 4v blocks different? What is different about them?
What makes mod motors respond so well to FI?
How do mod motors make so much power with stock cams? Does this have something to do with the difference between 2v and 4v? Do cams have that little of an affect on mods?
What cars had/have the 4v motor?
Can a mod motor be built N/A to stand up to a N/A pushrod motor (5.0)?
Do mod motors respond better to boost/n20 than pushrods motors?
You can correct me if you know I'm wrong

Well say you start out with a 2V motor. The head flow is ok on them. Well you decide to heavy port them to get more power. When you open up the ports a lot you tend to make the a/f mix lose velocity entering into the combustion chamber. With 4V heads you typically start out with more flow and better velocity right off to bat because of the less surface area the a/f mix has to fill getting by each port, but you have more surface area over all for power production. lt also take a lot of porting to lose a considerable amount of velocity on 4V's. The modulars also have many advancements over previous engines due to the modern engineering. One example could be the variable intakes which allow for good low end and top end power production.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2004, 07:34 AM
GTStang's Avatar
GTStang GTStang is offline
Stang Guy
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,189
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to GTStang
Re: Re: Modulars

Quote:
Originally Posted by boosted331
4 Valve motors produce tons of port swirl and flow massive amounts of air at low lift. You can flow just as good if not better than a head with 2 valves, but you keep the port velocity much higher running the 4 smaller valves and it's easier to put together a high flowing head on a small bore motor.

Do you honestly think that the cars do not run 4V heads because they are inferior to 2V pushrod motors, or do you think that they don't run 4V OHC heads because class sanctioning prevents them from running them, as well as the massive cost of building an entirely big block engine from scratch with a set of custom one off heads?

The reason there is such a performance difference between the 2V and 4V modular cars is since the 4.6 runs such a piss-ant 3.55 inch bore it is hard to get 2 big valves in there, and it's hard to get them to flow well. They come with small valves, so the heads do not flow very well. Even full ported most 2V heads are cracking 200-215 CFM's, whereas a well ported 2V head for a 5.0 with 2.02/1.60 valves will usually flow in the 300-330 CFM range.

IMHO, mod motors take boost much better than the old pushrod cars. For 550+ RWHP out of a 5.0 you need 2000+ dollars for a new 4-bolt block. For 550+ RWHP out of a 4.6 you need new pistons and rods, and a cobra crank if it's a 2V. For 4.6 heads you need to drop some cash to port them, stock 4V heads will flow 320+ CFM. For 5.0's you are going to drop 2000+ dollars for a set of heads that flow 320+ CFM's. 4.6's can spin to the moon, so even with less torque they can make more horsepower.

__________________
R.I.P. Hypsi- Andy your one of the best people I ever had the priviledge to know. AF and the world
has lost one of the truly wonderful people...

Reply With Quote
 
Reply

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums Car Chat > Ford > Mustang > Mustang Talk


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts