[GTStang]

Third-party perspective is usefull when that party is made aware to all the facts as in a situation like arbitration. But to pass judgement on limited information is rather irresponsible. I read how France made a nice oil deal with Iraq. Now is it fair for me to assume the only reason France is saying no to this war is cause they don't want to lose thier oil deal. Australia's made a deal with Iraq, wheat for oil, When their Prime Minister made and albiet quiet agreement with Bush to support him in the war agianst Iraq. When the Australian people found out about this and the people/government went nuts about it. Should I assume the Australian people only car about themselves and thier oil issues. I could so that the amount of pure cowardness and self-serving interest in the rest of the world is pathetic. I'm not saying that but I could if I was not informed of the whole situation.

"Don't judge someone until you walked a mile in thier shoes"