Thread: Ferrari F60
View Single Post
  #4  
Old 02-17-2001, 06:52 AM
danmangt40 danmangt40 is offline
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via AIM to danmangt40
Angry NOT THE F60!!!!

ok, enough is enough. I had a huge email argument almost a year ago (when I first saw the photo, its being passed around) with the guy who drew up with this graphic.. web designers who read this, please remove this photo from your sites or at least label it not to be an f60. The f60 is supposed to be better than the f50 and f40 by using the aerodynamic tricks associated with the 360 modena, WITHOUT that damn huge wing. Ferrari knows this, but then they realized that everyone was going to start drawing estimates of what the f60 would look like, so they encouraged people to draw sillier, less accurate images like the one above, which is little more than 20 minutes work in photoshop using a picture of a fioravanti f100 and a ferrari f50. PLEASE, this image is a fallacy... Automobile magazine has even bought into a hideously mangled caricature of a car labeled f60 with all sorts of gangly wings and odd protrustions... I promise u, the differences we will see from f50 to f60 will be similar to the ones made from f355 to 360 modena. Ferrari is out to be the best, not to release the 2003 stylistic update of the f40 design practice. Big spoilers are out too... the diablo 6.0 doesn't have one, vector is dead, the main 64 production mclaren f1s didn't have them (the GTRs, GTs, and LMs did, but that's a separate issue), please stop making ferrari chuckle by circulating this false info. I'll say that the photo is well-done, and that the author did 2 angles gives it more believability, but this is silly. the photo above is wholly unrelated to the f60, and is NO indication as to what it will look like.
__________________
Dan
www.danmanv8.com
Reply With Quote