View Single Post
  #8  
Old 03-02-2004, 11:37 PM
alkemyst alkemyst is offline
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 135
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 240sx vs. Integra GSR

Quote:
Originally Posted by nissanfanatic
The 240 is slower b/c we have a driveshaft and a rearend. the integra also has the advantage of all the weight of the engine and transmission on the front wheels adding traction. The only minus would be the gas tank.
Why would you think a driveshaft and rearend would slow the 240 down? FWD has way more frictional loss. The difference in weight between a transaxle and a rwd manual + shaft + rearend probably is negligable once drivetrain losses are figured in. [EDIT: NM This I was thinking automatic last night for some reason, however the FF and FR difference here is not why this race is lost]

The traction advantage of a transaxle over the driving wheels also may help, but is hardly the race winner...the momentum of a quick start will probably unload that weight advantage for the first 20 feet or so.

What you have to look at in a drag race (assuming both know what they are doing) is the HP of the GS-R is +15 or so more and having the advantage of being newer usually probably the difference is greater....you also have the fact that the GS-R is about 200lbs lighter as well...this is wear the advantage starts....

Another advantage esp in the drag is with a 7600 peak HP rpm vs the 240's in the upper 5k range you probably have one less shift needed. 0-60 times are about 1 sec off.

Lastly the GS-R is probably geared a bit taller, I think they are in the 4.xx range then usually having taller early gears (since they have the advantage of a almost 2k greater HP peak rpm).

Still the 240SX is a more superior car in my opinion. I have had a 92 style GS-R and liked it, but it had not perception of power and in any tight turn I had to baby the throttle or it would start pushing out.

Å

Last edited by alkemyst; 03-03-2004 at 08:36 AM.
Reply With Quote