Where you at? PLEASE READ FIRST POST FOR RULES

ok i saw a post by dampachi say that 90% of the regulars on this forum arent even in the 14's. I dont know if that is true or not, but it would be fun to see where everyone is at in the 1/4 mile. If you have never been to a drag strip with your car, DO NOT VOTE. This pull is for people who have been to the drag strip with there car. Also dont guesstimate your times. If you went to the track last month and ran a 15.1, now this week you got an intake and havent been to the track with it, dont put 14.9 Everyone is going to be able to see what time you voted for, so if you dont want to get flammed, post the right times. Also, after you vote, please tell us about your car performance wise. What it was stock, what you did to it. Where its at now.

Mine

2001 Cavalier Z24 Automatic.

Stock, 150HP@5400 RPMS, 155lbs@2400/4200 RPMS (yes it hits its max Torque twice)
Stock 1/4- 16.1@82MPH

Mods- Eaton M45 Supercharger 7 PSI, PaceSetter 4-1 Header, Upper and Lower engine mounts, grounding wires, K&N cone filter, and my Water injection system is being shipped to me as we speak.

Last time i was at the track i had horrible traction issues due to getting new tires put on that day. The best i could muster was a 14.7@93MPH, with a shitty 2.3 60ft.

1983 chrysler cordoba 318 Est. HP 260-290 15.8 @ 88 mph 1/4 mile. Ya Its slow and its a boat but it gets around.

Are you going to count Gtech numbers?

TypeS what do you have thats running 13.5-13.9?

ok no Gtech either, figured that would have been a given.

94 3000GT base w/ 142,000 miles on it. intake and cat-back ran it twice so far, best is 15.6@93mph

ok no Gtech either, figured that would have been a given.


:rolleyes:


Considering my car is in the 13.0-13.4 range. I'll let my vote stay. Thanks.


It may dip into the 12s with DR's, but that's a big maybe/what if.

:rolleyes:


Considering my car is in the 13.0-13.4 range. I'll let my vote stay. Thanks.


It may dip into the 12s with DR's, but that's a big maybe/what if.

Sorry sweetheart. This thread is for people who have actually been to a dragstrip. Not wishful thinking G-tech racers. You read the rules. Why can't you follow them?

[QUOTE=RedNeck383]:

Considering my car is in the 13.0-13.4 range. I'll let my vote stay. Thanks.


Ding. Same.

Sorry sweetheart. This thread is for people who have actually been to a dragstrip. Not wishful thinking G-tech racers. You read the rules. Why can't you follow them?

lol :lol2:
not even going to vote never been to the track, and never plan on going.... im sure my truck is slow tho

TypeS what do you have thats running 13.5-13.9?

My 540i/6 sport w/ CDV delete and short shifter, why?

Sorry sweetheart. This thread is for people who have actually been to a dragstrip. Not wishful thinking G-tech racers. You read the rules. Why can't you follow them?


Why waste my time at the strip when my car does this time stock? Ill goto the track after Ive dropped 2k in the car and Ill be running 12's.. then ill show you the slip.

My 540i/6 sport w/ CDV delete and short shifter, why?

I didn't know you got a new car. What exactly did you run?

I didn't know you got a new car. What exactly did you run?

It's in my sig :smile:

13.92 @ 102.4

Why waste my time at the strip when my car does this time stock? Ill goto the track after Ive dropped 2k in the car and Ill be running 12's.. then ill show you the slip.

And you can vote after that. Seriously guys..are you having a hardtime reading the rules or what? Does it need to be any bolder where it says "DO NOT VOTE IF YOU HAVE NEVER RAN AT A DRAG STRIP"?

Well, it really depends on the car.

Red 1989 Chrysler LeBaron GTC: 14.6 @ 98 MPH.

Stock HP: 174
Stock torque: 210

The only things that were done to the car were K&N filter, NGK Iridium plugs, and a Centerforce clutch, which I considered worse than stock. These are things I would hardly call mods except for the clutch, which I thought was crap. Had I been better at shifting at the time or had better tires I bet I could have mustered a 14.4?

Silver 1989 Chrysler LeBaron GTC: I would guess somewhere in the 15s.

Stock HP: 174
Stock torque: 210

Never taken this GTC to the strip. Anyhow, it isn't running nearly as good as the old GTC. The boost is cutting out too early and there is a vac leak somewhere.

Don't even ask with the Sebring. I would venture to guess it is in the 16s.

And you can vote after that. Seriously guys..are you having a hardtime reading the rules or what? Does it need to be any bolder where it says "DO NOT VOTE IF YOU HAVE NEVER RAN AT A DRAG STRIP"?


thats a good rule for pps with modded cars that dont wtf their car REALLY does... for us with cars already doing times you'll never see we can just vote and make you green with envy.

thats a good rule for pps with modded cars that dont wtf their car REALLY does... for us with cars already doing times you'll never see we can just vote and make you green with envy.

:lol2::lol2::lol2::lol2:

You're funny. Where you located? Care to lose some money to me?

:lol2::lol2::lol2::lol2:

You're funny. Where you located? Care to lose some money to me?


rofl
any freaking time. coconut creek florida. or anywhere near ft lauderdale.

So anyway..two people can't follow rules. So could a moderator please remove Redneck383 and KevinE326s votes? They're blatantly disobeying the set rules.

So anyway..two people can't follow rules. So could a moderator please remove Redneck383 and KevinE326s votes? They're blatantly disobeying the set rules.

omg rofl. reason for that rule I stated above. Why remove my car when it does what I posted stock? The vote is to be a fair accurate interpretation of the speeds of the cars that ppl here drive.

omg rofl. reason for that rule I stated above. Why remove my car when it does what I posted stock? The vote is to be a fair accurate interpretation of the speeds of the cars that ppl here drive.
Show me 3 different references saying a stock evo 8 runs 13.0s-13.4s and I'll leave you alone. I'm seeing 14.0 (1.9 60'), 13.6 (1.8) (with headers and mid pipe), and 13.5 on dragtimes.com. Sigh..magazine racing is lame.

Sorry sweetheart. This thread is for people who have actually been to a dragstrip. Not wishful thinking G-tech racers. You read the rules. Why can't you follow them?


Well first, I voted before I read the post. Yeah, my bad. But then again, Do I care?

Um, Nope.

I know it'll run that time, judging by all the cars I've raced and the Gtech time. No need to go to the track. Cause, mainly I just don't care. If I did, I would of gone.




And you're going to come down on me cause I closed your thread and didn't let you have your fun? Aww, yeah bring another moderator into this and remove my vote. Sure... yeah.. that's right. Why? Cause... according to you... I'm a
thread nazi.

^ taken from a PM.

:rolleyes:

Well first, I voted before I read the post. Yeah, my bad. But then again, Do I care?

Um, Nope.

I know it'll run that time, judging by all the cars I've raced and the Gtech time. No need to go to the track. Cause, mainly I just don't care. If I did, I would of gone.




And you're going to come down on me cause I closed your thread and didn't let you have your fun? Aww, yeah bring another moderator into this and remove my vote. Sure... yeah.. that's right. Why? Cause... according to you... I'm a


^ taken from a PM.

:rolleyes:

Aw, I'm sorry you can't read directions. It doesn't matter what cars you take..or what gtech or vtech or zetec says you run whatever times. This is for proven times only. Oh no! That was a private message! And you're bringing it out into the public. Instead of bringing that out into the opening why didn't you PM me and work that out? You're having a really hard time with following rules. I think you need to take a time out and reread the original post which says no gtech. Drag strip only.

Me?

Hard time with rules? Nah.

And why PM you and work it out? You were the one complaining that I closed your thread. I worked that situation out. I told you I was done explaining to you why I closed it and that I wasn't going to reopen it. And you called me a thread nazi for doing my job as a moderator AND as I stated saving you the grief of people getting all pissed off cause you wouldn't tell them what was up with your thread. Look what happened to CivRacer95's swap thread, exactly... I wanted to keep that from happening.

Sorry for keeping peace in the forums. For fucks sake get over yourself.

Show me 3 different references saying a stock evo 8 runs 13.0s-13.4s and I'll leave you alone. I'm seeing 14.0 (1.9 60'), 13.6 (1.8) (with headers and mid pipe), and 13.5 on dragtimes.com. Sigh..magazine racing is lame.

Shows all 3 versions and their respect times.
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0503_evos/index5.html

3 other sources with varying times. If you want to whine some more you can drop my car down one notch to 13.5 + but I really dont care.

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html

http://www.ssmoparmuscle.com/speedcomp.htm

http://www.car-stats.com/stats/showstats/showstatsgivenid.aspx

Soooooooo STFU!

Show me 3 different references saying a stock evo 8 runs 13.0s-13.4s and I'll leave you alone. I'm seeing 14.0 (1.9 60'), 13.6 (1.8) (with headers and mid pipe), and 13.5 on dragtimes.com. Sigh..magazine racing is lame.
yeah I agree. I have seen sooo many EVOs and STis running 13.9-14.1@99-101 on 1.9-2.0 launches.

Voted.

yeah I agree. I have seen sooo many EVOs and STis running 13.9-14.1@99-101 on 1.9-2.0 launches.

Voted.

read above links. Do a search on the net. Read any magazine.

If the pps you watched can drive its not the cars fault. :)

I will not delete their votes but I might close this thread. Damp, you need to wake and smell the fact that you're not a moderator so stop trying to be one. They haven't broken any FORUM rules so I don't feel inclined to do anything about it because I agree with them. If you don't feel their vote counts then don't acknowledge it.

Shows all 3 versions and their respect times.
http://motortrend.com/roadtests/sedan/112_0503_evos/index5.html

3 other sources with varying times. If you want to whine some more you can drop my car down one notch to 13.5 + but I really dont care.

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html

http://www.ssmoparmuscle.com/speedcomp.htm

http://www.car-stats.com/stats/showstats/showstatsgivenid.aspx

Soooooooo STFU!
All 13.6s. You proved nothing. Mod, remove his vote.

Edit: And one 13.5. But this isn't magazine racing. This is supposed to be real times.

Aw, I'm sorry you can't read directions. It doesn't matter what cars you take..or what gtech or vtech or zetec says you run whatever times. This is for proven times only. Oh no! That was a private message! And you're bringing it out into the public. Instead of bringing that out into the opening why didn't you PM me and work that out? You're having a really hard time with following rules. I think you need to take a time out and reread the original post which says no gtech. Drag strip only.
You know, one would think that someone of youre APPARENT intelligence would be able to play the part of the better man and let it go and keep on track with the thread. However, since you can't I will do it for you.

I will edit the thread title to say please read the first post for instructions. If anything happens after that, deal with it. Life is too short to bitch over such a thing.

Any and all thoughts/comments about this post or anything before it are to be directed via PM to myself or Redneck383. Any comments not pertaining to this thread or deviating it from it's overall purpose will be deleted.

Now who's the thread Nazi.

I will not delete their votes but I might close this thread. Damp, you need to wake and smell the fact that you're not a moderator so stop trying to be one. They haven't broken any FORUM rules so I don't feel inclined to do anything about it because I agree with them. If you don't feel their vote counts then don't acknowledge it.

Explain why. Neither of their times are legit. So I don't see how you could agree with them. The rules say NO GTECH. Matts time was ran with a Gtech. The rules also say that unless you have ran your car at a dragstrip..don't vote. Kevin didn't run his at a dragstrip.

read above links. Do a search on the net. Read any magazine.

If the pps you watched can drive its not the cars fault. :)

I dont care about the rags. I care about REAL results and REAL people. Just like john Basedow!
:smokin:

Stock his Evo can run that and Matt's car has beaten cars that can run that. Besides, I know the Gtech works as long as you get the weight of the car dialed in right. Since Matt isn't an idiot I trust the results. That is why I agree with them.

Like I said before, they haven't broken any FORUM rules so their votes won't be removed.

EDIT:

Here is the deal. We, the moderators of AF are here to enforce the rules of AF not some rules you make up in a thread.

Any and all thoughts/comments about this post or anything before it are to be directed via PM to myself or Redneck383. Any comments not pertaining to this thread or deviating it from it's overall purpose will be deleted.




This takes effect NOW.

11.3

Parkland Motorsports drag car 1980 Chevy Malibu, i was actively involved in the rebuilding of the 355, and made the 11 second pass. You can say it wasn't my car, and it isn't, it's all the students car, so i feel like it is mine, i put a lot of blood sweat and tears in that car so dont even say this doesn't count. I could have put the Z28 time on there, it runs a 12.9, but i didn't build that.

Apparently I ran a 17.02 at a track in Wendover. Kris told me. They didn't have any time slips or anything. Just witnesses were your only source of proof. I had my excuses though:

1. Bad traction
2. Bad track
3. I just drove 200 miles to get there
4. The sun wasn't positioned right
5. I had the heater on
6. My side of the track always sucked
7. I wasn't playing the right music to get pumped
8. I needed a tune up
9. The tree delayed on my several times, so I didn't know when to go
10. It's a Honda, what else can I say?

But, I'm not going to give any more excuses. As you can see, I had a hard enough time as it was. Although, I don't think Kris was telling me the truth...:sly:

I didn't even know my mph or anything at all, just my time.

2001 volkswagen gti vr6

[email protected]

60ft: 2.468
1/8mi et: 9.799
1/8mi speed: 72.940
1/4mi et: 15.183
1/4 speed: 93.000

this time was done when the car was stock. i ran that time within the first week of driving the car, so it could have been better. i've added a GIAC chip that should give me some more hp, and hopefully i will be in the 14's next time i take it to the track.


2003 infiniti g35

[email protected]

60ft: 2.256
1/8mi et: 9.502
1/8mi speed: 75.890
1/4mi et: 14.683
1/4mi speed: 95.451

did these times when the car had 200mi on it, so maybe it's faster now. it's still stock but it may have gained some speed post break-in. next time i go to the strip i hope to run around a 14.500.

did these times when the car had 200mi on it, so maybe it's faster now. it's still stock but it may have gained some speed post break-in. next time i go to the strip i hope to run around a 14.500.

Wow...200 miles. Doing WOT runs and launching a car with that many miles is not a really good idea. Does your car use any oil now? Any bad effects from not breaking it in properly?

As for me, never been to the track. Hope to go soon. My honda should run low 16s, and I might be in the 15s with my non-turbo MR2. Didn't vote though.

naw no excess oil is used. i change it every 2000-2500miles anyway, but the car seems to be fine. i think most problems that arise from drving fast during the break-in period are due to the lack of an engine warm-up. before the run i made sure it was warmed up, and i only ran it twice with some cool down driving in between. same deal w/the gti. no issues, car runs great.

i'm a believer of this school of thought when it comes to break-in.
http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm

some may not believe in this, but it has worked for me. when it was stock, i had one of the fastest 174hp vr6 gti's around. 15.1 w/a bad 60' isn't too shabby. same deal w/the g35...this shit is an automtaic, and it
s neck and neck w/my friends 350z convertible.

Wow...200 miles. Doing WOT runs and launching a car with that many miles is not a really good idea. Does your car use any oil now? Any bad effects from not breaking it in properly?

As for me, never been to the track. Hope to go soon. My honda should run low 16s, and I might be in the 15s with my non-turbo MR2. Didn't vote though.

Holy fucking shit. Clawhammer, you seriously need to receive an award. You actually managed to follow directions. I knew the directions were written clear enough. I guess some people just haven't made it that far with the English language. Hats off to you, my friend. :thumbsup:







BTW: NO sarcasm intended.

Sorry! Please Remove my vote. I was stupid and voted before reading the post. But, i belive i should be in that range with my new dyno numbers SAE 437 rwhp and 440 torque at the wheels. This was with 21 pounds of boost on a sp61gt turbo with a 1988 Supra. Sorry.

Sorry! Please Remove my vote. I was stupid and voted before reading the post. But, i belive i should be in that range with my new dyno numbers SAE 437 rwhp and 440 torque at the wheels. This was with 21 pounds of boost on a sp61gt turbo with a 1988 Supra. Sorry.

Eh. People are posting times of cars they don't even have. So fuck it. Don't worry man.

10.3 in a lumina hatch but I guess I am off the scale.

gtech time.

i ran a 13.2 at englishtown which is right about sea level. im not going to lie and say i couldnt get traction it would have been a 7.9 easy. i was using drag radials, my list of mods is in my sig.

ill probably repost in 2 weeks when i do an LT1 swap :evillol: im hoping for <12 w/heads cam

16.8 in a stock 2002 GMC HD 6.0...106k on the odometer, needs tune-up badly, and torque converter is a mess, but mostly, it's a big slow truck :)

BUT IT'LL PULL YOUR AXLES OFF DAMMIT!!! :evillol:

12.29@113mph............ I hate running the damn 60-1 at only 16psi.......... mods in sig.

(with higher boost and better tuning, car will do low 11's, possible dip into 10's)

EDIT: Damn I hate that email thing when you put the at symbol

Honestly haven't made a run at the speedway yet. Also honestly don't mind if you get your knickers in a twist about it damp ole boy but I will say that the time I did put up was most likely higher than I will run.



All who read my time, please disregard it as it is not factual info yet.

Well you said actual times ran...so I put 13.5, however, that was stock w/ K&N as you can see my mods have grown a bit. I just haven't gotten it to the track in over a year, many similar drivers with the exact same mods have run 12.7-12.8 So, take that for what you will.

Not sure what she runs, haven't had it to the track this year. I would estimate, judging by the cars I've raced that it will run between a 10.5 and a 17.3

2001 Grand Am GT - I ran a 15.5 up at Stanton a month or so ago with nothing but a homemade intake, removed MAF screen, MSD 8 mm's, and about 150 pounds of weight reduction, and lots of little insignficant shit not even worth mentioning. Since then, I've improved my intake, gotten a composite ram-air hood, and on Tuesday I'll be having a custom downpipe installed and my reasonator removed. I figuire if I were to run again, I'd probably be around 15.1 to 15.3. Still not fast, but it'd be a 1/2 second drop of what my car runs stock - 15.8ish

Oh, I thought I'd throw in that I was at about 900 ft elevation, and 80 degree temp, if that means anything. And my trap speed was 87 mph.

I bet my 89 LeSabre T-Type would run 16's....

Not sure what she runs, haven't had it to the track this year. I would estimate, judging by the cars I've raced that it will run between a 10.5 and a 17.3

wow thats narrowing it down quite a bit...

Fuck it dude, just say your shit runs 9s. Everyone else is making stuff up..so why not join the party? :thumbsup:


Why don't you just shut up?


You're being an asshole, wait... you always are a asshole to anybody who isn't you.


:rolleyes:

Keep it up Damp and you're going to earn yourself a vacation from AF. Nobody has been just making up shit. Some people have posted estimated times that AREN'T far fetched.

You're making a huge deal out of a little thing and I am getting sick and tired of you acting like a little kid. If I see one more post like your last one you're getting that little vacation I told you about. Also, if you don't change your attitude then I can very well make it permanent!

Keep it up Damp and you're going to earn yourself a vacation from AF. Nobody has been just making up shit. Some people have posted estimated times that AREN'T far fetched.

You're making a huge deal out of a little thing and I am getting sick and tired of you acting like a little kid. If I see one more post like your last one you're getting that little vacation I told you about. Also, if you don't change your attitude then I can very well make it permanent!


Low 13s isn't farfetched for a stock evo? :rolleyes: Posting times for a car you don't even own isn't stupid? Posting times made on a Gtech when the thread specifically states no gtech times isn't also stupid? I'm sorry I have an opinion. :disappoin

Low 13s isn't farfetched for a stock evo? :rolleyes: Posting times for a car you don't even own isn't stupid? Posting times made on a Gtech when the thread specifically states no gtech times isn't also stupid? I'm sorry I have an opinion. :disappoin



Low 13s for an Evo, I don't see it as too far fetched. Maybe he's a good driver?

Just like how you're able to get low low 14s in your Mustang GT.

And, his car might be a factory freak with a bit more power. That does happen.

GTech times are pretty accurate. And like I said, I voted before I saw his post. My bad, whoops... oops. Big deal, but my times aren't far fetched. The car would run those times. Considering the road I was testing on was a back country road and dusty, it was crap for traction the 60ft times of 2.2 were evident of that. 2000LS1Z28 weighs a good 170-180lbs? And that was first day I drove my car in 2 months. And it was measured at 13.4 @ 106mph.

On a track, it probably of done better. Who knows? All signs point to it being capable of faster.

If I had said 12's, I can see you reason to bitch at me.


Fair enough?

1990 Mustang GT.

331 stroker (DSS)
Comp Cams XE274HR
AFR 185 Heads
Track heat Trickflow intake (rpm range is 2500-6500)
C&L custom CAI w/K&N conical filter
Full Bassani exhaust (Long tube headers, xpipe, mufflers)
8.8 rearend w/ 3.73's
Tuned on arizonadyno chip's dyno for safe A/F.
Power output= 300+rwhp n/a

Best ET to date: 12.77@112mph