S/C Z24 VS Stage 2 WRX

hey sup guys just thought id share what i mildly modded s/c'd Z24 can do

its not mine but its a guys on JBO

Z24 vs Alero:

ftp://24.46.243.248/Z24vsAlero.avi

Z24 vs Stage2 WRX:

ftp://24.46.243.248/Z24vsStg2WRX.avi

lets see if that works

Pshh I won't creat an account just for a vid..

yeah niether do i. spending 2 mins to create an account to watch a cavalier? no thx.

ehh updated the first place check it out again

Curious..

Why supercharger and not turbo?

gm makes a supercharger kit for the 2.4 J-bodies.....yet no one even knows well outside of J-body sites

soo next time you think your gonna be racing a cavalier think twice some have 190hp stock lol

soo next time you think your gonna be racing a cavalier think twice some have 190hp stock lol
So he will only be 8 bus lengths back then??

I wouldn't call it stock. Or can you buy a J-Body with a charger from a dealership? With 0-5 miles on it?

lol dont laugh some guys have got into the very low 13's with the charger

you used to be able to buy one at the dealership on the 02 models it was an option but that was the only year as they then moved to the 2.2 ecotech engine but i still consider it stock on any 00-02 2.4 J as there computer is reflashed and everything from GM

lol dont laugh some guys have got into the very low 13's with the charger

you used to be able to buy one at the dealership on the 02 models it was an option but that was the only year as they then moved to the 2.2 ecotech engine but i still consider it stock on any 00-02 2.4 J as there computer is reflashed and everything from GM
Cool. Wasn't sure about that.

I can laugh, I would still smoke them. :evillol:
I dig fast J-Body's. As long as they look stock. Sleeper style.

What does your car run with all that done to it Z?

cant he internals on that engine handle much more than the 7psi your running? just curious

hes got the same setup as i do. Im going to the track tomarrow, so ill tell you guys my times. Im hoping for low 14's. The stock internals on a LD9 engine in the Z24s cand handle up to 10 PSI on stock internals. But thats pushing it.

Heres my mods

GM Supercharger package
2.7 Pulley~ 7PSI
B&M Shiftplus
PaceSetter 4-1 Header
K&N Filter
Upper engine mount

and thats it, ive added 3 mods since i went last time and ran a 14.7@91 MPH. I added 2.5 lbs of boost, the shiftkit, and the header. Im preying for high 13's, but realistically i think ill be very low 14s.

Would you get more output on a tubro? or is the supa charger given you more out put? Or is it that its just ALOT cheaper to go GM supa charger?

Would you get more output on a tubro? or is the supa charger given you more out put? Or is it that its just ALOT cheaper to go GM supa charger?
I am going to bet the s/c is much cheaper.
I would think the turbo would be more power though. I know at least the EcoTec loves a nice turbo.

yeah i got most the same mods as Jayson but i have a few more things like larger cams and both motor mounts CAI i have a 5speed where hes auto and im not running the factory reflash so im not pulling anytiming which = more power as well

jay will run probley low 14's with his setup

also the LD9 (2.4L) can take in most cases 10psi from a T3/T4 turbo setup and put down over 270whp on stock interals....

the GM charger doesnt have the out put of a turbo charged setup the we get 40hp and 40trq from 4.5psi with the reflash so that about 9hp per psi where turbo you might see more

boosted Z's are not slow guys just because its a cavy or fire dont mean anything

geuss its a secret to what every s/c jbody runs around here huh.....

embarassed guys?.....;)

They made supercharged ecotec cavvy's from the factory, it was called the tuner's edition or something like that, they had the ground effects kit, the s/c, 5 speed, and some other stuff. As for making them fast, there's nothing wrong with rodding them out, as long as you're trying to make it fast that's cool.

The way the Cavy's motor is set up i just can't see it performing all that well. Its ment to be a peppy econo engine. You boost it you break it. But hey to each his own.

The way the Cavy's motor is set up i just can't see it performing all that well. Its ment to be a peppy econo engine. You boost it you break it. But hey to each his own.
Agreed. With at least the 2.4. But it also isn't all that expensive to build that motor either.

The Ecotec loves boost though. Watch for those. I have seen some of those surprising people.

Agreed. With at least the 2.4. But it also isn't all that expensive to build that motor either.

The Ecotec loves boost though. Watch for those. I have seen some of those surprising people.

Yeah def. The new Cobalt SS and RL's are crazy fast for a 2.0l supa charged. I really think the blowers they have on there are dead ends. They have maxed the crap outa em. Did you see what they are offering for a performance gain? A turbo to go along with the super charger?!?!?!? where is the sence in that. I would like to see them go the same route as the Srt-4. I bet those Ecotech's would scream with a turbo charger. Imo take the supercharger off and put a turbo on your SS/RL. You would east Srt-4s for breakfast.

I dont know about eating them for breakfast, i think it would be a nice match to see though. There's still a shit load you can do to a car once it's supercharged though, i highly doubt it's maxed out. You can still toy with the fuel and ignition system, as well as computer and a better set of rubbers. And there's also the possibility of putting a different pulley on.

I dont know about eating them for breakfast, i think it would be a nice match to see though. There's still a shit load you can do to a car once it's supercharged though, i highly doubt it's maxed out. You can still toy with the fuel and ignition system, as well as computer and a better set of rubbers. And there's also the possibility of putting a different pulley on.

what i mean is the S/C is maxed out. Its allready runnen 12lbs of boost and its intercooled. A pully wont help at all. They are allready very close to max boost.

WOW i cant beleave how much people dont know about the J platform no wonder why people think where slow

first off the a GM supercharger 2.4 engine puts out 170whp on the dyno thats with everything stock besides the charger @4.5psi, add a CAI,62mm TB,4-1 performance header, 2.5" exhaust setup and your running in around 200whp as the charger loves to breath then after that you can upgrade to smaller pulleys and increase the boost level to 7psi to gain another 20whp, you can then after all that go into the engine and get some larger cams and port and polish the head and you can also add alchole injection to cool the charge and go with even smaller pulleys and put out 10psi

if you do all that its good for around 250-260whp if done right

also with 4.5psi(stock psi) and a 55 shot you can get into the mid 13's with everything else stock you can get low 13's with a 75shot rather then a 55 shot as well thats all on street tires as well

im not making any of this up

anyways no there was never any cavalier with a body kit and a supercharger from the factory atleast not with the ecotech engine only the 2.4 in 02 was supercharger from dealership

also 270whp/320bhp is alot in a very light car with some radials you can dip to the mid 12's and low 13's on street tires all on stock interals idk about you but i really dont consider that not having potential or slow for that matter you can build these engines up really good and if you replace the stock interals with forged then you good for over 400whp+ on the 2.4 engine as its already been done

stock for stock the 2.4 can hold as much boost as an ecotech but the 2.4 react better to boost and mods and usally get more hp per psi so them are actualy the ones to watch out for though you should still be watching out for the ecotechs as well as they are not to far off

as for the Cobalt ss s/c no the supercharger isnt the cars limiting factor GM already has a 300HP verson of it using the same charger @ 18psi so i dunno what the heck your talking about, but in the end the engine can hold over 500hp if it was being pushed by a turbo but i dont think 300hp is anything to laugh at when they run mid 14's on just 200bhp

anything else i can clear up for ya

WOW i cant beleave how much people dont know about the J platform no wonder why people think where slow

Your right. They do have some opportunity to be quick.

Problem is, for the most part, owners rice them out. This is where they get their reputation.

And yes, I will even call a supercharged Cavi slow.

dont understand how you can connsider it slow when they can keep up with the likes up a camaro SS or transam's lol of course thats stock on there be half but then again we only have half the engine

lol you probley dont even run low 13's anyways so what are you to say

they are not the fastest car in the world or even close to being fast but deffinatly not slow imho
i consider it quick for a tuner/4banger, heck i could take out turboed eclipses and talons on just 4.5psi all day even took out some newer mustang Gt's on 4.5psi stock everything but just take this into consideration ... how many other compact cars in the cavys class, price range and year can run mid 14's and be considered stock....hmm NONE

o but your right on the whole riced out situation.. : ( people tend to make them into demestic rice lol

i swear my car will never be one

mr luos most everything is slow to you. But alot of people dont know that the LD9 twin cam is built off the design and bottom end of the Quad 4 racing engine. This is a 4 cylinder engine that has gotten over 1200 HP. In race setup atleast.
the 2.4L Ld9 Engine is a very strong engine that responds really well to boost. And as OrangeZ was saying it responds even better once you let the engine and charger breath. Ill admit cavaliers have a bad reputation cause of all the base models that are riced out.
And the ecotec doesnt love boost. Thats a big misconception. If it loved boost so much, GM wouldnt have to destroke it to add the blower. Not to mention they seem to blow up alot easier. The ecotec is supposed to be getting a charger from GM like the LD9. Only thing is, they have rated it at 175HP with 11 PSI. According to GM it gains 35HP on 11 PSI. Thats kinda sad if thats true.

BTW i didnt make it to the track tonight, they cancelled test n tune night for a heads up street racing night.

lol you probley dont even run low 13's anyways so what are you to say
I certainly hope that wasn't a jab at my car.

im hearing you CAN run 13's with them....what the hell are YOU guys running?

Really why keep avoiding this question?

And how can you consider it stock if it has a supercharger... and a 55 shot to see mid 13's along with all the other mods you have said it would take....not too impressive.

lol you probley dont even run low 13's anyways so what are you to say





OH NO HE DIDN'T!


Would you please tell me approximately (give or take $200 or so) how much it would cost to build a cavi to run low 13's?

anyways no there was never any cavalier with a body kit and a supercharger from the factory atleast not with the ecotech engine only the 2.4 in 02 was supercharger from dealership


So the one i saw at the local dealer was just an illusion then? Interesting...

So the one i saw at the local dealer was just an illusion then? Interesting...

probabily. There isnt even an ecotec supercharger out for the 2.2L engine. It wont be out till prolly the end of this year. The ONLY year that you could get a cavalier with any kind of FI from the factory was 2002. ANd that was with the Ld9 engine. BUt there are alot of dealership scams made up with cavaliers to try and make them sell better. The Z22 for instance, no such thing according to GM, but some dealerships think it is. There are also alot of body kits that only get used very rarely. Like the Cavalier Extreme body kit.

im hearing you CAN run 13's with them....what the hell are YOU guys running?

Really why keep avoiding this question?

And how can you consider it stock if it has a supercharger... and a 55 shot to see mid 13's along with all the other mods you have said it would take....not too impressive.

No one likes you, thats why were avoiding you, and if you took the time to read the thread, you would know the answer to that question of how fast we are running. And you can consider it stock if it has a supercharger cause it was an option to have the supercharger put on the car from the factory in 2002. Now its not a stock Z24, its a stock Z24 S/C.

A stock Z24 S/C will run mid 14's. Lets say 14.5 to make it even. You need to shave .5-.6 tenths of a second off to make it to the 13's. Thats not very hard to do on a stock car. You could easily do that for less than 500 bucks.

So the one i saw at the local dealer was just an illusion then? Interesting...

must have been ether that or it was a 2.4 there is no supercharger for the 2.2 yet only gm has cavaliers with the 2.2 eco and charger and there not for sale


and yes i know camaros and trans ams newer models atleast are in the 13's it takes a good driver and a few things to get into the low 13's with them though

and the cost of a turbo kit can get you into the mid 13's with these cars so thats about $2000 if you buy a kit less if you peice it together you self and if you add some slicks you can get into the 12's its been done all on stock interals add another 800 to that and you can have all stock interals and run more then 400whp although at that point you will also have to do some treatment to the tranny and axles but thats a given

if you wanna go the supercharged way and get into the 13's dont cost to much ether GM supercharger is 2000k and another 500 for the n2o kit and your done, or you could just invest into breathing bolt ons and some cams like me and be there as well

ether way its about $2000-$3000 to get a everyday 13 sec street car

anyways i was not saying a supercharger and a shot of n2o was stock however the supercharger is and with just the supercharger and everything stock you can get mid 14's with a 5spd and high 14's with a auto

o yeah and the guy that ran mid 13's on a 55 shot was having major traction issues because of his street tires he could have done alot better on slicks he tried a 75 shot later and got into the low 13's still with traction issues a stock 2.4 with just a 55 shot can get into the high 13's low 14's so that proves that case


man us J's cant get a break

O yeah you do know that car in the vid the cav was racing was a Stage 2 WRX right?? guess not even though its in the title. just to let you know it has close to 300hp its basicly the same as a sti and can run low 13's ......

I am not thinking track times here. I am thinking if I caught one on the street. Probably from a roll. The HURT I would put on it.

I never said they can't be made fast. Problem is, they are few and far between. The owners also have a thing with ricing them out. So even if they hang with me (by that I mean stay within 5 bus's) I will still laugh at the look of the car.

Sorry man, but you are right, J's can't catch a break. Most of their owners (not saying you guys here) rice them out and are complete tools. Blame your fellow owners.

So the one i saw at the local dealer was just an illusion then? Interesting...


maybe it was a cobalt... :lol:

Don't worry OrangeZ, my generation of Civics can't catch a break either. Just roll along with the hits, and atleast you know your Cavy is fast enough regardless of what others have to say. BTW My generation of Civics are the 92-95 or 5th Gen Civics. Notoriously known for being the Pepboy Bitches. All they have are things for the 92-95 Gens'. That's why you see so many of them "riced".

For me, I know for a fact that I am "faster" than atleast 75% (maybe less) of them out there. Don't sweat it, and move along. L8...

well i think there is only like 150 cavaliers in the world that have the setup orangeZ and myself have. So finding one isnt gonna be easy. But so far i have not yet met a single person who after riding in my car was not seriously impressed with the speed that it has. I took it to a performance shop to have the pulley changed, the owner drove a Mercedes Cl230 or something like that. Nicely tunned, he test drove my car and thought it was impressive. Last night i went down to the local street races, i popped the hood and had about 15 people standing around my engine bay looking at the charger and asking questions. All of them impressed.

If anyone ever takes a trip to michigan, just hit me up, ill give ya a ride and show you what i mean.

Lots of people like me, you just dont.

Nothing impressive about a 2.4L supercharged/bolt on car running high 14's....its quite sad actually, dont feel special because 15 ricers stood around your car and were impressed.

And civracer I dont know if you mean just in your town or in general but...your are not faster than 75% of them in general...probably not even 50%

Its still a crapalier with a dead end engine. Good luck running with an LS1. I know my srt-4 will eat most of your cars for lunch. I highly doubt ANY of you guys can even run with mr. Lous.

Now the 2.0L ecotech they got in the RL and SS. That thing can hall. i am very impressed with those 2 cars can't wait to run em.

S/C plus 2.4L + fatty shot of nos = 20k on the odo before the big bang.

Edit: Civichbsi Btw i believe civ's claim. From the stories i have read from him it looks like he has a low 15 high 14 sec car. put that in a world where all ready 50% of em are runnen 18s i would believe he is faster then 75%.

Its still a crapalier with a dead end engine. Good luck running with an LS1. I know my srt-4 will eat most of your cars for lunch. I highly doubt ANY of you guys can even run with mr. Lous.

Now the 2.0L ecotech they got in the RL and SS. That thing can hall. i am very impressed with those 2 cars can't wait to run em.

S/C plus 2.4L + fatty shot of nos = 20k on the odo before the big bang.

Edit: Civichbsi Btw i believe civ's claim. From the stories i have read from him it looks like he has a low 15 high 14 sec car. put that in a world where all ready 50% of em are runnen 18s i would believe he is faster then 75%.

i used to respect you man, but you want to rip on my car you can just go fuck yourself. A dead end engine? Id like to see you take your engine to 1200HP. Cause thats the record with the LD9 engine. This engine can take 120HP more before it needs its internals replaced, id like to see you do that. Anways you drive a neon, like thats any better than a cavalier.
And a high 14 second car with a supercharger? No thats with the AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION. Put a manual in it and its a mid 14 second car. I mean shit you did a whole engine swap and you run nitrious and you still cant get into the 13's. And no, i dont think many people here like you, youve been banned more times than anyone else here, you should get a little award for that.
ANd it wasnt 15 ricers, there was a V8 trans am, an 05 Mustang GT, 2 GAGT, a highly modded mustang 5.0. The list goes on. I live in michigan buddy, rice isnt a big thing here, everyone here owns a v8. Rednecks dont like rice.

Lots of people like me, you just dont.

Nothing impressive about a 2.4L supercharged/bolt on car running high 14's....its quite sad actually, dont feel special because 15 ricers stood around your car and were impressed.

And civracer I dont know if you mean just in your town or in general but...your are not faster than 75% of them in general...probably not even 50%


ummmm.. i dont think you even read anything i wrote a supercharger Z24 with nothing else done to it only pushing 4.5ps from a supercharger not a turbo(less cfm per psi) is hitting mid 14's i think is pretty good, and a bolt on supercharged Z24 can get well into the 13's even with out N2O once into the 13's though the Z24 has traction problems at take off because of our tourqe curve is so low so with stock rims and tires we have a hard time getting the most out of our launches thus the guy running stock and a 55 shot was only hitting mid 13's and with a 75 low 13's if he had some wider rims and better tires them times could have been different

also jaysons 14.7 was stock with an auto tranny thats not bad at all name one car in the same class and price range that can do that i bet you cant

jay i dont think we can win this war man everyone is against us no matter if are cars run 10's everyone out there will say they are slow so wtf i dunno

lol my traps speak for themselves, I have no doubt that I could spank you witout the spray, plus that setup is old news.

Ive been banned because you and some ricers around here cant take some criticism and mods have to wipe their eyes dry and tuck them in at night because they are soft.

IMO cavaliers are built like shit(you cant even argue with that everyone knows how shitty they are built), look like shit and are slow as shit.

haha your a funny guy well i hope your well into the 13's if ya wanna spank me lol because im already there with out the spray... maybe you could take a stock supercharged Z24 but im far from stock

o and not to mention i dont have to swap my motor out to make some real HP like some people.....

as for the built of the cavalier umm ive owned 2 already and never had a problem with ether of them and i put them threw tourcher

i bet you probley never even drove in a Z24 anyways so what do you know about the quality of it its actualy not that bad

name one car in the same class and price range that can do that i bet you cant

An se-r is close to those times from the factory and that's all motor! Give me $2000 and I guarantee I could keep up.

Orange Z u seemed like you know ur info but u just need to word what u are saying different and go about it in a diff way. Hell if u wanna build a fast cav and make ppl wonder what the hell just happend go for it. to each his own. but dont act like its the fastest thing on the planet. yes your z24 what runs 13's is quick but watch what u say bc Mr. Lous at sea level would pry run low 12's i believe your dyno results where 470 rwhp wasnt it mr.lous not to metion he drives a ws6 which is low 13's stock so even if he was stock he would kick your ass. be very carful who u attack your getting alot of crap bc u were offended some ppl when u came in here so now they are being defensive. so if you want to prove something or show something dont attack ppl or even make stabs at mr lous car when if u knew as much as it seems you would know a WS6 would beat the shit out of your z24 cavy. just trying to help you out man.

376.8 RWHP my man. 470 is coming soon though.

Right now, I could probably only muster a very high 12, but it would be insanely fast for the ET. Probably around 113-114 MPH. Damn clutch doesn't like being launched. Either way, that will be fixed soon enough.
I am gunning for a very high 11 later this year on street tires. Not going to be able to even try to launch. Shooting for 120 MPH or so.

I have nothing against the J-Body cars. They can be made fast. They can be sleepers. Thing is, you guys are getting WAY too defensive about it. J-Body's have gotten a reputation, and it is hard to break outta it.

You guys have spouted off times?? Post your timeslips please.
Until then, good luck.

My car is 15 years old, it had a 1.6 sohc in it...it has a 1.8 dohc in it now...wow... you need 2.4L and supercharger and cams and every bolt on to hit 13's which who knows if you do you just might think you do because you havent posted up a time like I nicely asked in the first couple pages but you avoided the question.

I have driven many z24's and sunfires/cavaliers more than you have, I used to work at a chevy dealership. Shifter felt like a stick in mud, interior was cheap plastic with some cheap ass seats and carpet, and they had the same interior for how many years? radio sucked, new and old they all made funny noises under the hood and all over the place...overall shitty build everyone whos owned or driven in a cavlier can cleary see that.

I spent 2,300$ including the car and it was easily capable of 13's with a fixed motor mount and beter tires. New setup should be done before summer with 12's in hand for less than 4 grand...you try that with a crapalier

I spent 2,300$ including the car and it was easily capable of 13's with a fixed motor mount and beter tires. New setup should be done before summer with 12's in hand for less than 4 grand...you try that with a crapalier

So what HAVE you ran with your car? Also, what swap did you do?

14.3's with 99mph traps and they were getting higher and higher I only had 4-6 runs in with the nitrous only a 50 shot, on an LS with ebay short ram and a thermal cat back....broken rear motor mount, it was so bad the engine hit the firewall after every shift or even just hitting the gas and this was done on bald 8+ year old tires.

Dont know how high my traps would have gotten but I would have broken the 100mph mark and with better tires/motor mount the 1-2 and 2-3 shifts wouldent have contributed to wheel spin.

14.3's with 99mph traps and they were getting higher and higher I only had 4-6 runs in with the nitrous only a 50 shot, on an LS with ebay short ram and a thermal cat back....broken rear motor mount, it was so bad the engine hit the firewall after every shift or even just hitting the gas and this was done on bald 8+ year old tires.

Dont know how high my traps would have gotten but I would have broken the 100mph mark and with better tires/motor mount the 1-2 and 2-3 shifts wouldent have contributed to wheel spin.

man you get ever excuse in the book dont you? What else happened your grandmother walked in front of your car so you had to slow down? Gimmie a break. Last summer you spouted the same bullshit to me, its still the same old story. Gimmie a 50 shot of N02 and i will be mid 13's. Next year were gonna hear the same excuses.

Like you can even talk about the quality of a car. You drive a 14 year old civic. That just screams quality right there. Tell us about your manual windows? And your lack of AC? Can you tell us how you need to use a key to open the doors and turnk? How about how fun it is to manually position your mirrors everytime you go through a car wash? And the stock stereo sucks? The stock stereo in my Z24 sounds better than the 300 dollar stereo i had put in my old car. A Poineer Headset and JBL speakers. You drive a POS car with an engine swap, your not special.

ANd this was my best time when i was STOCK with the supercharger.

Reaction: .569 (.500 perfect)
60 FT: 2.068
330 FT: 6.084
1/8 ET: 9.375
1/8 MPH: 73.66
1000 ET: 12.273
1/4 ET: 14.743
1/4 MPH: 91.30

man thats a nice 60 ft aint it? All on stock tires and suspension. If i had a manual it would be more like 14.5@98MPH. 20 bucks says Civic cant even find one for his.

Jesus no need for you to get all nasty jayson. only reason i responed that way cause the guy with the orange crapalier thinks he is tough shit and can beat mr.Lous. There are so many people who put a turbo kit on thier econo car or S/C and think they can beat LS1's. Lets be realistic here. You picked the black sheap of motor build ups. Most people build up a nissan(SR20DE), honda(speaks for itself), Mistu(4g63) or toyota(think supra). Not a 2.4L cavy. Why? you said it your self, its only going to handle anoth 120 hp on top of that the after market support is nothing compaired to those 4.

The block i have now can EASILY run 500 WHP. without even touching the internals. (stage 3 w/ toys, 3 inch dp, no cats + 3 inch exhaust, 100 octane, WGA, 20 PSI) I have no clue if there is an srt-4 drag car. I think the Dodge drag car is a reg neon with the 2.0L dohc neon block with dodge avenger heads. i have no clue what hp they are runnen with that thing.

Yes i know its a neon, i have no problem admitting it. When somone pulls up next to me and asks what it is i tell em its a neon. Or when someone decides to talk shit about my car they call it a pos neon. When i beat them they say they got beat by an srt-4 not a neon. :)

Anways you drive a neon, like thats any better than a cavalier.


lol i like ya chex... but thats a good point

14.3's with 99mph traps and they were getting higher and higher I only had 4-6 runs in with the nitrous only a 50 shot, on an LS with ebay short ram and a thermal cat back....broken rear motor mount, it was so bad the engine hit the firewall after every shift or even just hitting the gas and this was done on bald 8+ year old tires.

Dont know how high my traps would have gotten but I would have broken the 100mph mark and with better tires/motor mount the 1-2 and 2-3 shifts wouldent have contributed to wheel spin.

What, it wasn't uphill in the snow, against 30MPH wind, and in 130 degree weather? I think there are some more excuses that you can throw in there. Also, making a Honda fast is old, there are so many quick hatches out now with b22/b18 swaps its like standard now. When one of the first things you ask a Civic hatch now is "what engine swap did you do?" you know it's done too much. Now a supercharged Cavalier, that's something thats different.

.............so how come the video link doesnt work anymore :)

It's done so much because its effictive and cheap habibus, why do people get fox body mustangs gee not because its cheap to go fast now is it. if you want to go spend 15k on a 14.7 car when you can go spend 2,000 on one be my guest.

No excuses, just factors. the time was slow ive said it before ill say it now ill say it again.

july 30th, 2004
9:35 pm

r/t: .806
60': 2.194
330: 6.086
1/8th: 9.275
mph: 77.90
1000: 11.999
1/4: 14.300
mph: 99.43

The block i have now can EASILY run 500 WHP.

Not to get in the middle of this, but that's mainly only because your motor's built for forced induction. Forced induction motors ALWAYS have stronger internals then N/A motors.

r/t: .806
60': 2.194
330: 6.086
1/8th: 9.275
mph: 77.90
1000: 11.999
1/4: 14.300
mph: 99.43


for the 60 ft time and the trap speed thats an awefully fast 1/4 time isnt it? dampachi posted 2.1 60 fts and 102 trap i think and he was running a 14.6 :sly:

Weeeeeeeeee!!! We can run 14's, who gives a fuck...time for thread to close now

I can run 14's too... on stock boost.

Yay?