Bad timing? Rough idle?
2002windstar
03-01-2014, 05:11 PM
Hi all, new to the forum, at least in terms of registering and posting.
Great information on this site, it has been nice just to have access to the knowledge base here.
Here is my problem.
2002 Windstar, 3.8L, ~168k. I have emission testing coming up in April and the CEL was on (has been on for a while). The typical 0174, was "fixed once before, 2 years ago by a service center to pass emission at that time, the CEL stayed off for sometime but eventually came back on.
I found this site by looking for have the 0174 "fixed" again and took to the work myself, along with my kid.
We did the upper and lower intake manifold gaskets, IAC gasket, trottle body gasket, since we were "in there" we replaced the coolant by pass tube along with the front valve cover replacement (cover/pcv/pcv tube/fuel regulator tube).
Removed everything and installed everything according to proper procure and to torque specs.
Upon starting the engine back up the idle was/is extremely rough and wants to almost stall when put into drive or reverse. While in park the timing seems to smooth out at higher rpm (2500) but while driving (which I have only done for a short distance < 1mile at 20 mph or less) the is a backfire occurring.
I did double check that all sensors were plugged back in, checked for the presence of a vacuum leak with both throttle body cleaner and a propane bottle that I attached a tube to. Neither test revealed a leak.
So now my thoughts are bad plugs/wires/coil, camshaft synchronizer and after that I am just not sure at this point.
I have an ODBII that I recorded data and something that caught my eye was the difference between fuel bank trims. Also I have 0v on OS22 - bad O2 sensor?
Here is the average data from 68 reading (I can go into each reading for more detail if anyone thinks that will help)
MIL status - off
ABSLT TPS% - 17.3
ENG SPEED RPM - 782
CALC LOAD% - 23.5
MAF LB/M - 0.82
COOLANT (F) - 162
IAT (F) - 39
IGN ADV (Degrees) - 15.5
ST FTRM1% - -2.3
ST FTRM2% - -8.6
LT FTRM1% - -5.5
LT FTRM2% - +24.2
VEH SPEED MPH - 0
FUEL SYS1 - CLSD
FUEL SYS2 - N/A
O2S11(v) - 0.065
ST FTRM11% - +0.8
O2S12(v) - 0.075
O2S21(v) - 0.100
ST FTRM21% - +2.3
O2S22(v) - 0.000
ODB2 STAT - CA
Thanks for taking the time to read this post.
Great information on this site, it has been nice just to have access to the knowledge base here.
Here is my problem.
2002 Windstar, 3.8L, ~168k. I have emission testing coming up in April and the CEL was on (has been on for a while). The typical 0174, was "fixed once before, 2 years ago by a service center to pass emission at that time, the CEL stayed off for sometime but eventually came back on.
I found this site by looking for have the 0174 "fixed" again and took to the work myself, along with my kid.
We did the upper and lower intake manifold gaskets, IAC gasket, trottle body gasket, since we were "in there" we replaced the coolant by pass tube along with the front valve cover replacement (cover/pcv/pcv tube/fuel regulator tube).
Removed everything and installed everything according to proper procure and to torque specs.
Upon starting the engine back up the idle was/is extremely rough and wants to almost stall when put into drive or reverse. While in park the timing seems to smooth out at higher rpm (2500) but while driving (which I have only done for a short distance < 1mile at 20 mph or less) the is a backfire occurring.
I did double check that all sensors were plugged back in, checked for the presence of a vacuum leak with both throttle body cleaner and a propane bottle that I attached a tube to. Neither test revealed a leak.
So now my thoughts are bad plugs/wires/coil, camshaft synchronizer and after that I am just not sure at this point.
I have an ODBII that I recorded data and something that caught my eye was the difference between fuel bank trims. Also I have 0v on OS22 - bad O2 sensor?
Here is the average data from 68 reading (I can go into each reading for more detail if anyone thinks that will help)
MIL status - off
ABSLT TPS% - 17.3
ENG SPEED RPM - 782
CALC LOAD% - 23.5
MAF LB/M - 0.82
COOLANT (F) - 162
IAT (F) - 39
IGN ADV (Degrees) - 15.5
ST FTRM1% - -2.3
ST FTRM2% - -8.6
LT FTRM1% - -5.5
LT FTRM2% - +24.2
VEH SPEED MPH - 0
FUEL SYS1 - CLSD
FUEL SYS2 - N/A
O2S11(v) - 0.065
ST FTRM11% - +0.8
O2S12(v) - 0.075
O2S21(v) - 0.100
ST FTRM21% - +2.3
O2S22(v) - 0.000
ODB2 STAT - CA
Thanks for taking the time to read this post.
scubacat
03-01-2014, 05:53 PM
Did you clean out the little EGR ports while you were in there? Also, are the little white IMRC bushings secure and in place?
2002windstar
03-01-2014, 06:06 PM
Did you clean out the little EGR ports while you were in there? Also, are the little white IMRC bushings secure and in place?
Thanks for the quick response scubacat - No I did not clean out the EGR ports on the lower manifold and actually just watch a short video here on it. I have a feeling that will be my next step, should have done it while it was out.
The IMRC bushings are intact. Question - should the IMRC operate if the van is in park and the RPM is brought up to >2000? Or does it only operate if the vehicle is in drive? I did have my kid watch the IMRC while I brought the RPM up and he said that he did not see any movement. (He is 17 and a good helper, unlike my 16 year old :sly:)
Thanks for the quick response scubacat - No I did not clean out the EGR ports on the lower manifold and actually just watch a short video here on it. I have a feeling that will be my next step, should have done it while it was out.
The IMRC bushings are intact. Question - should the IMRC operate if the van is in park and the RPM is brought up to >2000? Or does it only operate if the vehicle is in drive? I did have my kid watch the IMRC while I brought the RPM up and he said that he did not see any movement. (He is 17 and a good helper, unlike my 16 year old :sly:)
2002windstar
03-02-2014, 12:31 AM
While reviewing the data on my ODBII, O2S22 has 0v and never registered any voltage during the data capture - obviously a problem.
I will check the wires and connection and clean it with electrical connection cleaner and retest, this is the sensor on the cat, if it is in fact bad it is an easy replacement.
Just thinking out load, my LT fuel trims are really high on bank 2 (compared to bank 1) and fluctuate from 3 to over 24 while bank 1 fluctuated from -1.6 to -7.8 a much tighter range.
To be honest I'm not sure which trim level are "normal", if either of them are.
I'm thinking it is not coincidence that I have a bad O2 sensor on bank 2 and my fuel trims are all over the place on bank 2, any input or thoughts?
Still planning on cleaning the EGR ports on the manifold to see if that makes any difference.
I will check the wires and connection and clean it with electrical connection cleaner and retest, this is the sensor on the cat, if it is in fact bad it is an easy replacement.
Just thinking out load, my LT fuel trims are really high on bank 2 (compared to bank 1) and fluctuate from 3 to over 24 while bank 1 fluctuated from -1.6 to -7.8 a much tighter range.
To be honest I'm not sure which trim level are "normal", if either of them are.
I'm thinking it is not coincidence that I have a bad O2 sensor on bank 2 and my fuel trims are all over the place on bank 2, any input or thoughts?
Still planning on cleaning the EGR ports on the manifold to see if that makes any difference.
12Ounce
03-02-2014, 07:21 AM
Up to this point, has the synchronizer been disturbed? Also, can you block open the throttle plate, and do a compression test on all cylinders?
2002windstar
03-02-2014, 03:37 PM
Up to this point, has the synchronizer been disturbed? Also, can you block open the throttle plate, and do a compression test on all cylinders?
Hey 12Ounce,
No the synchronizer has not been disturbed - I do not have a compression gauge but may need to pick one up. Is your thought, if the synchronizer has not been disturbed then it is not likely the issue?
I should have also stated the this condition was only mildly present prior to the changing of the manifold gaskets but after re-assembly almost renders the van un-driveable. Prior to the change the was never a backfire which now happens occasionally.
Today I am taking the plenum off to clean the EGR ports and going to pull the plugs to take a look at how each one looks.
For under a 100 bucks I can get new plugs and wires (they were done about 67K ago with 100K plugs), a O2 sensor to replace the bad one (bank 2/sensor 2) and possibly a new DPFE which has never been replace.
I do realize I may not need everything but in Ohio if you have spent $300 on emission repairs and it still does not pass (they do an ODBII reading) they will give you a waiver to renew your plates.
With the manifold gasket kit, valve cover repair kit and the above will put me a little above the $300 mark. This will at least allow to get the plates renewed and hopefully help solve my rough idle/timing issue.
Hey 12Ounce,
No the synchronizer has not been disturbed - I do not have a compression gauge but may need to pick one up. Is your thought, if the synchronizer has not been disturbed then it is not likely the issue?
I should have also stated the this condition was only mildly present prior to the changing of the manifold gaskets but after re-assembly almost renders the van un-driveable. Prior to the change the was never a backfire which now happens occasionally.
Today I am taking the plenum off to clean the EGR ports and going to pull the plugs to take a look at how each one looks.
For under a 100 bucks I can get new plugs and wires (they were done about 67K ago with 100K plugs), a O2 sensor to replace the bad one (bank 2/sensor 2) and possibly a new DPFE which has never been replace.
I do realize I may not need everything but in Ohio if you have spent $300 on emission repairs and it still does not pass (they do an ODBII reading) they will give you a waiver to renew your plates.
With the manifold gasket kit, valve cover repair kit and the above will put me a little above the $300 mark. This will at least allow to get the plates renewed and hopefully help solve my rough idle/timing issue.
wiswind
03-02-2014, 05:56 PM
Oxygen sensor #2......located AFTER the catalytic converter should NOT cause any rough idle/bacfire issue.
These are the "downstream" sensors that only monitor the exhaust to verify that the catalytic converters are working.
The oxygen sensors that are located between the catalytic converter and the motor, the "upstream" sensors are the ones that are used to adjust the fuel mix.....and could cause the problems that you are having.
However, it is not that easy......if one of those is "dead".......the computer (PCM) will give you a code saying that the sensor is defective.....and will then ignore the sensor data and use a basic program to keep you running.
The oxygen sensor numbering system is as follows.
HOS11 is in BANK 1, Upstream sensor
HOS21 is in BANK 2, Upstream Sensor
HOS12 is in BANK 1, Downstream Sensor
HOS22 is in BANK 2, Downstream Sensor
Bank 1 is the bank of cylinders that has Cylinder #1
Upstream is before the catalytic converter (used to control the engine)
Downstream is AFTER the catalytic converter (monitors the catalytic converter).
$300 limit or not.....I'm sure that you want to get this thing running at a usable state.
I'm not up on what correct fuel trim values should be, you might try searching to look for a post that has them as I have seen people post them before.
As a side note.....if you get to unplugging any oxygen sensor......use care to make sure that you mark the plugs on the harness.
At least on my '96, it was possible to plug them back into the WRONG plugs.....which will drive you super crazy trying to figure it out.
Cylinder #1 is in the back, passenger side of engine.
REAR bank is bank #1
Front bank is bank #1
This means that your P0174 code is indicating a lean condition for the FRONT bank of cylinders.....bank #2.
If you find that your IMRC is not working.....it is best fastened in the closed position.
It should be in the closed position until you have a high power need at high RPMS
Don't rev the engine to try to get it to open.
If it is closed on BOTH banks, you are fine as far as the issues that you are having.
Are there any other code(s) present?
These are the "downstream" sensors that only monitor the exhaust to verify that the catalytic converters are working.
The oxygen sensors that are located between the catalytic converter and the motor, the "upstream" sensors are the ones that are used to adjust the fuel mix.....and could cause the problems that you are having.
However, it is not that easy......if one of those is "dead".......the computer (PCM) will give you a code saying that the sensor is defective.....and will then ignore the sensor data and use a basic program to keep you running.
The oxygen sensor numbering system is as follows.
HOS11 is in BANK 1, Upstream sensor
HOS21 is in BANK 2, Upstream Sensor
HOS12 is in BANK 1, Downstream Sensor
HOS22 is in BANK 2, Downstream Sensor
Bank 1 is the bank of cylinders that has Cylinder #1
Upstream is before the catalytic converter (used to control the engine)
Downstream is AFTER the catalytic converter (monitors the catalytic converter).
$300 limit or not.....I'm sure that you want to get this thing running at a usable state.
I'm not up on what correct fuel trim values should be, you might try searching to look for a post that has them as I have seen people post them before.
As a side note.....if you get to unplugging any oxygen sensor......use care to make sure that you mark the plugs on the harness.
At least on my '96, it was possible to plug them back into the WRONG plugs.....which will drive you super crazy trying to figure it out.
Cylinder #1 is in the back, passenger side of engine.
REAR bank is bank #1
Front bank is bank #1
This means that your P0174 code is indicating a lean condition for the FRONT bank of cylinders.....bank #2.
If you find that your IMRC is not working.....it is best fastened in the closed position.
It should be in the closed position until you have a high power need at high RPMS
Don't rev the engine to try to get it to open.
If it is closed on BOTH banks, you are fine as far as the issues that you are having.
Are there any other code(s) present?
wiswind
03-02-2014, 06:13 PM
To add to what I have posted.......I know that you have already looked for any hose(s) that might be disconnected.
But look again......look at the hose that goes from the breather (rear valve cover on your 2002) to the big flex hose that goes from the throttle body to the air filter box.
That has been known to get knocked loose.
Also verify the vaccum line from the PCV valve to the upper intake manifold....for any cracks, etc.
Before you put the upper intake manifold back into place.....make sure that things are wiped down.....no dirt/grit on the seating surfaces.
Also make sure that the upper intake manifold gaskets are staying in place.
Make sure that the fuel injectors are pressed down into their locations in the lower intake manifold.
NOTE.....the area around each fuel injector is a major catching location for a lot of road grit.
You want to have that cleaned away BEFORE you lift a fuel injector up out of the lower intake manifold.
At this point.....I do not suspect that you have any problem with a fuel injector because that would give you a misfire code on a specific cylinder.
At this point....things are pointing toward some vaccum leak into the intake.
A vaccum leak is any air getting into the engine that does not pass through the MAF that is mounted on the air filter box.
The air that is drawn into the breather to replace the air drawn out through the PCV valve is drawn out through the tube that I mentioned for you to check in the flex hose.......so it has passed through the MAF.
But...any air entering through any of the many vaccum lines is game....as well as many other possibilities....which is what makes tracking this down so difficult.
But look again......look at the hose that goes from the breather (rear valve cover on your 2002) to the big flex hose that goes from the throttle body to the air filter box.
That has been known to get knocked loose.
Also verify the vaccum line from the PCV valve to the upper intake manifold....for any cracks, etc.
Before you put the upper intake manifold back into place.....make sure that things are wiped down.....no dirt/grit on the seating surfaces.
Also make sure that the upper intake manifold gaskets are staying in place.
Make sure that the fuel injectors are pressed down into their locations in the lower intake manifold.
NOTE.....the area around each fuel injector is a major catching location for a lot of road grit.
You want to have that cleaned away BEFORE you lift a fuel injector up out of the lower intake manifold.
At this point.....I do not suspect that you have any problem with a fuel injector because that would give you a misfire code on a specific cylinder.
At this point....things are pointing toward some vaccum leak into the intake.
A vaccum leak is any air getting into the engine that does not pass through the MAF that is mounted on the air filter box.
The air that is drawn into the breather to replace the air drawn out through the PCV valve is drawn out through the tube that I mentioned for you to check in the flex hose.......so it has passed through the MAF.
But...any air entering through any of the many vaccum lines is game....as well as many other possibilities....which is what makes tracking this down so difficult.
12Ounce
03-02-2014, 09:48 PM
What Wiswind is pointing too is most important. It is easy to assume we know the layout of the engine ... but best to have a moment of truth and get it straight. If you need a diagram ... there is one in the first pages of a Haynes manual.
2002windstar
03-03-2014, 12:00 AM
Based upon the layout of my exhaust, my downstream O2 sensors are located in the cats (picture attached from my Haynes, my layout is identical), there are no O2's after either of the cats.
And yes I do want to get the van back to a usable state - it has been a great vehicle over the years.
I replaced all 4 O2 sensors around the 110,000 mile mark, the 2002 O2 sensors are 4 wire connections that can only go on one way, at least on my model.
I double checked all of the vacuum line connection and all are connected properly.
The IMRC are in the closed position, there is one controller for both banks and is electronically controlled only - no vacuum connection.
No codes are present other than ABS codes for the front 2 wheel sensors, which should not affect idle (I'll deal with the ABS after the idle problem is taken care of).
The vacuum line from the PCV is brand new (part of the valve cover repair kit) along with a new PCV.
I cleaned out the plenum, upper intake manifold and lower intake manifold very good prior to re-assembly the 1st time, to my angst I DID NOT clean the EGR ports as shown in the video posted in this forum, I did clean them tonight though but needed to stop due to the time and need to get up for work in the AM.
I don't believe that my injectors are an issue either - the o-rings on both the rail side and engine side were replaced and I did pay particular attention to then when checking for a vacuum leak, I hit each one with both propane and throttle body cleaner and at no time was there any change in the engine.
I also believe that it is acting like a vacuum leak but dang if I can locate it! Anyone here ever do a smoke test for a vacuum leak before? It also looks like something I might try if cleaning the EGR ports hasn't resolved my issue.
And finally thank you for all the input and suggestions - please keep them coming until I get this figured out!!
And yes I do want to get the van back to a usable state - it has been a great vehicle over the years.
I replaced all 4 O2 sensors around the 110,000 mile mark, the 2002 O2 sensors are 4 wire connections that can only go on one way, at least on my model.
I double checked all of the vacuum line connection and all are connected properly.
The IMRC are in the closed position, there is one controller for both banks and is electronically controlled only - no vacuum connection.
No codes are present other than ABS codes for the front 2 wheel sensors, which should not affect idle (I'll deal with the ABS after the idle problem is taken care of).
The vacuum line from the PCV is brand new (part of the valve cover repair kit) along with a new PCV.
I cleaned out the plenum, upper intake manifold and lower intake manifold very good prior to re-assembly the 1st time, to my angst I DID NOT clean the EGR ports as shown in the video posted in this forum, I did clean them tonight though but needed to stop due to the time and need to get up for work in the AM.
I don't believe that my injectors are an issue either - the o-rings on both the rail side and engine side were replaced and I did pay particular attention to then when checking for a vacuum leak, I hit each one with both propane and throttle body cleaner and at no time was there any change in the engine.
I also believe that it is acting like a vacuum leak but dang if I can locate it! Anyone here ever do a smoke test for a vacuum leak before? It also looks like something I might try if cleaning the EGR ports hasn't resolved my issue.
And finally thank you for all the input and suggestions - please keep them coming until I get this figured out!!
12Ounce
03-03-2014, 07:44 AM
Does your model have "coil-on-plug", or does it have the "ignition pack"? If you have the pack, are you sure of the pack-to-plug cable order?
.
Did you replace the (8) hold-down bolts when you did the intake manifold repair?
.
Have you located the timing markings on the harmonic balancer? .... Have you confirmed the timing marks are correct by comparing them to a plastic "feeler rod" dropped into the #1 cylinder? (On high mileage engines, it is possible for the rubber element on a harmonic balancer to go soft, allowing the toothed ring to get out-of-sync with the crankshaft ... then the ignition timing is incorrect. I just replaced the balancer on an old Tracer ... that had slipped 30 degrees or more.)
.
Did you replace the (8) hold-down bolts when you did the intake manifold repair?
.
Have you located the timing markings on the harmonic balancer? .... Have you confirmed the timing marks are correct by comparing them to a plastic "feeler rod" dropped into the #1 cylinder? (On high mileage engines, it is possible for the rubber element on a harmonic balancer to go soft, allowing the toothed ring to get out-of-sync with the crankshaft ... then the ignition timing is incorrect. I just replaced the balancer on an old Tracer ... that had slipped 30 degrees or more.)
2002windstar
03-03-2014, 10:47 AM
Does your model have "coil-on-plug", or does it have the "ignition pack"? If you have the pack, are you sure of the pack-to-plug cable order?
I have the ignition pack, I made the mistake once of getting the plug order wrong so pay close attention anytime I remove any wire from it, but never hurts to triple check
.
Did you replace the (8) hold-down bolts when you did the intake manifold repair?
Yep with green grommets, VICTOR REINZ has a complete kit with all of the gaskets associated with the manifold (upper/lower/plenum, IAC, throttle body, EGR, aluminized RTV sealant and the new mounting bolts.
.
Have you located the timing markings on the harmonic balancer? .... Have you confirmed the timing marks are correct by comparing them to a plastic "feeler rod" dropped into the #1 cylinder? (On high mileage engines, it is possible for the rubber element on a harmonic balancer to go soft, allowing the toothed ring to get out-of-sync with the crankshaft ... then the ignition timing is incorrect. I just replaced the balancer on an old Tracer ... that had slipped 30 degrees or more.)
No I have done this but will add it to my check list of items to verify, compression testing is also on that list as well.
I have my fingers crossed that when I put the plenum back on tonight that cleaning the EGR ports did the trick - but I never seem to be that lucky.
Thanks for the suggestions and I'll update later.
I have the ignition pack, I made the mistake once of getting the plug order wrong so pay close attention anytime I remove any wire from it, but never hurts to triple check
.
Did you replace the (8) hold-down bolts when you did the intake manifold repair?
Yep with green grommets, VICTOR REINZ has a complete kit with all of the gaskets associated with the manifold (upper/lower/plenum, IAC, throttle body, EGR, aluminized RTV sealant and the new mounting bolts.
.
Have you located the timing markings on the harmonic balancer? .... Have you confirmed the timing marks are correct by comparing them to a plastic "feeler rod" dropped into the #1 cylinder? (On high mileage engines, it is possible for the rubber element on a harmonic balancer to go soft, allowing the toothed ring to get out-of-sync with the crankshaft ... then the ignition timing is incorrect. I just replaced the balancer on an old Tracer ... that had slipped 30 degrees or more.)
No I have done this but will add it to my check list of items to verify, compression testing is also on that list as well.
I have my fingers crossed that when I put the plenum back on tonight that cleaning the EGR ports did the trick - but I never seem to be that lucky.
Thanks for the suggestions and I'll update later.
scubacat
03-04-2014, 12:09 AM
When I first did this, one of the wires somehow slipped off the coil pack. Be sure to make sure they're all securely fastened (around your waist. In the event of a water landing... never mind...)
Also, you might want to remove the coil pack and look at the back side of it. If you see any cracks (even a tiny one), you'll get arcing and will need to replace the coil pack. That's unfortunately a routine failure item for these vans. (I'm on my second one currently.)
Also, you might want to remove the coil pack and look at the back side of it. If you see any cracks (even a tiny one), you'll get arcing and will need to replace the coil pack. That's unfortunately a routine failure item for these vans. (I'm on my second one currently.)
12Ounce
03-04-2014, 07:33 AM
And BTW, have you even taken a test drive with the vacuum hose removed, and plugged, that powers the EGR valve? Just to see if removing the EGR from the combustion will eliminate the bad engine performance?
.
(Of course, this will also cause additional temp codes>)
.
(Of course, this will also cause additional temp codes>)
2002windstar
03-06-2014, 10:49 PM
Update time - after a couple of days of teens to below zero temps in our area I finally caught a weather break - it was in the low 30' today and felt like a heat wave! :runaround:
Anyway I was able to look at several potential issues.
Removed the plenum to clean the EGR ports - they actually looked fairly clean, so I must have at least hit them with throttle body cleaner when it was off for the gasket change. I did take a coat hanger wire and put it through each port - just in case there was blockage but at this point it doesn't appear to be the issue.
I triple checked the vacuum hoses and connection to the upper intake manifold, all appear in good condition and were/are properly connected.
I pulled the plug wires off of the ignition pack and removed the pack to inspect it for cracks. There are no cracks on the body or in the underside in the epoxy.
So I decided to pull the plugs and inspect them, on each bank I had at least one on each bank that had ash accumulate on it to the point of the ash contacting the electrode, I had some that appeared "normal" and some that had slight carbon deposits. The plugs are Bosch Platinum Fusion plugs.
At his point I believe it is the plugs, they were replaced 67k miles ago along with the coil pack.
I order wires and plugs from RockAuto which should be here maybe Saturday. After installing these hopefully the issue will be gone. If not the next step will be to remove the vacuum from the EGR, plug it and take it for a ride.
Thanks for the suggestions and I will update upon installation of the plugs and wires.
Anyway I was able to look at several potential issues.
Removed the plenum to clean the EGR ports - they actually looked fairly clean, so I must have at least hit them with throttle body cleaner when it was off for the gasket change. I did take a coat hanger wire and put it through each port - just in case there was blockage but at this point it doesn't appear to be the issue.
I triple checked the vacuum hoses and connection to the upper intake manifold, all appear in good condition and were/are properly connected.
I pulled the plug wires off of the ignition pack and removed the pack to inspect it for cracks. There are no cracks on the body or in the underside in the epoxy.
So I decided to pull the plugs and inspect them, on each bank I had at least one on each bank that had ash accumulate on it to the point of the ash contacting the electrode, I had some that appeared "normal" and some that had slight carbon deposits. The plugs are Bosch Platinum Fusion plugs.
At his point I believe it is the plugs, they were replaced 67k miles ago along with the coil pack.
I order wires and plugs from RockAuto which should be here maybe Saturday. After installing these hopefully the issue will be gone. If not the next step will be to remove the vacuum from the EGR, plug it and take it for a ride.
Thanks for the suggestions and I will update upon installation of the plugs and wires.
scubacat
03-07-2014, 12:08 AM
Do those plugs have more than one electrode? Those are well known to wreak havoc on this engine. Consider switching to autolite double platinum. Model # APP105. Iridium plugs are a waste on this engine because the polarity is reversed on one bank and they'll wear unevenly. Make sure you don't get "AP105".. Get the DOUBLE PLATINUM ones with platinum on the ground strap as well as the electrode.
The Autolite are identical to OEM motorcraft plugs.
The Autolite are identical to OEM motorcraft plugs.
2002windstar
03-07-2014, 01:21 AM
Do those plugs have more than one electrode? Those are well known to wreak havoc on this engine. Consider switching to autolite double platinum. Model # APP105. Iridium plugs are a waste on this engine because the polarity is reversed on one bank and they'll wear unevenly. Make sure you don't get "AP105".. Get the DOUBLE PLATINUM ones with platinum on the ground strap as well as the electrode.
The Autolite are identical to OEM motorcraft plugs.
Yeah, they actually have 4, they looked like a good idea at the time :screwy:
I'll take a picture of them and post when I replace them - I ordered prior to your post and ordered Bosch Super Plus, copper resistor - I know these have a shorter life span than Plats but in all honesty I don't see me keeping this van for more than a couple of years at the most. 167K mile, if I get another 30-40K out of it I will be happy.
Thanks for the input.
The Autolite are identical to OEM motorcraft plugs.
Yeah, they actually have 4, they looked like a good idea at the time :screwy:
I'll take a picture of them and post when I replace them - I ordered prior to your post and ordered Bosch Super Plus, copper resistor - I know these have a shorter life span than Plats but in all honesty I don't see me keeping this van for more than a couple of years at the most. 167K mile, if I get another 30-40K out of it I will be happy.
Thanks for the input.
TheBackyardDIYer
03-07-2014, 10:02 AM
I actually just replaced the plugs and wires on my van while I was doing the lower intake manifold gasket. I had a few plugs with the ashing your are talking about as well. I replaced them with the same plugs scubacat mentioned--the Autolite Double Platinum. The van runs much smoother, but I can't say that it was directly related to the spark plugs. I did the isolator bolt fix, changed the DPFE from the metal one to the newer style plastic one, changed the lower intake manifold gaskets, PCV valve, blah blah blah...
Anyway, I know that wiswind in the "General Windstar Information" sticky thread recommends that you get the "double platinum" as that is what our vans require:
"The correct replacement spark plug is a double platinum plug......with platinum enhancement on BOTH the center electrode and the Ground tab.
This is because the windstar's ignition system uses a Positive spark on one side of the engine and a Negative spark on the other side. This causes the center electrode to wear faster on one side of the engine, and the ground electrode to wear faster on the other."
I know you've already ordered some, but it may be worth it to try and get the double platinum instead.
OH...and make sure to check the gap size...the guy at AutoZone told me they were pre-gapped, but they weren't the right gap width
Anyway, I know that wiswind in the "General Windstar Information" sticky thread recommends that you get the "double platinum" as that is what our vans require:
"The correct replacement spark plug is a double platinum plug......with platinum enhancement on BOTH the center electrode and the Ground tab.
This is because the windstar's ignition system uses a Positive spark on one side of the engine and a Negative spark on the other side. This causes the center electrode to wear faster on one side of the engine, and the ground electrode to wear faster on the other."
I know you've already ordered some, but it may be worth it to try and get the double platinum instead.
OH...and make sure to check the gap size...the guy at AutoZone told me they were pre-gapped, but they weren't the right gap width
2002windstar
03-08-2014, 03:47 PM
Plugs arrived today, going to install them, put the ignition coil back in and get ready for the wires which should be here Monday.
I will probably get a set of the recommended double platinum's in the near future.
Here is a question regarding torque specs - the Haynes manual call for specs in the 84-132 in-lbs range. The spec on the box for the plugs is 180 in-lbs. I am thinking of splitting the difference at putting them in at 156 in-lbs. Or should I follow the Haynes and not go above the max of 132 in-lbs so I don't risk the possibility of stripping the head? Thoughts guys?
TIA.
I will probably get a set of the recommended double platinum's in the near future.
Here is a question regarding torque specs - the Haynes manual call for specs in the 84-132 in-lbs range. The spec on the box for the plugs is 180 in-lbs. I am thinking of splitting the difference at putting them in at 156 in-lbs. Or should I follow the Haynes and not go above the max of 132 in-lbs so I don't risk the possibility of stripping the head? Thoughts guys?
TIA.
12Ounce
03-08-2014, 04:23 PM
I personally like approx. 100 in lbs. Easy to find on my torque wrench.
.
Its the guys who misread the "in lbs" to be "ft lbs" that strip the holes. Even Clik and Clak once recommended 85 ft lbs for spark plugs (I quit listening right then except for the jokes.)... couldn't believe my ears.
.
But the plug bodies can be damaged at much lower torques ... that's why I make sure to never overtorque.
.
Its the guys who misread the "in lbs" to be "ft lbs" that strip the holes. Even Clik and Clak once recommended 85 ft lbs for spark plugs (I quit listening right then except for the jokes.)... couldn't believe my ears.
.
But the plug bodies can be damaged at much lower torques ... that's why I make sure to never overtorque.
2002windstar
03-08-2014, 04:32 PM
Thx for the reply 12Ounce - going to remove the old and install the new ones.
2002windstar
03-08-2014, 06:38 PM
Gapped the new plugs to 0.054 put a little anti-seize on the threads and installed to 110 in-lbs. Took the old ones out, kept them in order and took these picks.
When I pulled the 1st one earlier this week, cylinder #6 it looked extactly like cylinder #2 with the ash build up. I cleaned it a little with a wire brush and replaced it. Then I pulled cylinder #5 on it had heavy carbon on it, then pulled #4. With 3 different looking plugs on one bank it is then I decided to replace then and the wires.
Looking at all six it seems to me that #5 is not firing or firing out of order, as much as I would like to think that I did not mix the front bank wires up (5&6) I may have.
Any way, with the new wires I will make sure that they absolutely are correctly attached to the coil .
Here are the plugs
In order 1-6/left to right
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/all_zps6b497a45.jpg
Plugs 1 &2
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/1-2_zpsd2f563ae.jpg
3&4
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/3-4_zpsfc6728c2.jpg
5&6
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/5-6_zps8854f23c.jpg
Opinions?
[IMG]http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/<a rel=nofollow href=http://s100.photobucket.com/user/labman_2006/media/Van/all_zps6b497a45.jpg.html target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/all_zps6b497a45.jpg
When I pulled the 1st one earlier this week, cylinder #6 it looked extactly like cylinder #2 with the ash build up. I cleaned it a little with a wire brush and replaced it. Then I pulled cylinder #5 on it had heavy carbon on it, then pulled #4. With 3 different looking plugs on one bank it is then I decided to replace then and the wires.
Looking at all six it seems to me that #5 is not firing or firing out of order, as much as I would like to think that I did not mix the front bank wires up (5&6) I may have.
Any way, with the new wires I will make sure that they absolutely are correctly attached to the coil .
Here are the plugs
In order 1-6/left to right
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/all_zps6b497a45.jpg
Plugs 1 &2
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/1-2_zpsd2f563ae.jpg
3&4
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/3-4_zpsfc6728c2.jpg
5&6
http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/5-6_zps8854f23c.jpg
Opinions?
[IMG]http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/<a rel=nofollow href=http://s100.photobucket.com/user/labman_2006/media/Van/all_zps6b497a45.jpg.html target=_blank rel=nofollow>http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m5/labman_2006/Van/all_zps6b497a45.jpg
wiswind
03-08-2014, 06:46 PM
Let's see how you do without those multiprong plugs.
One thing is for sure.....they needed replacement.
One thing is for sure.....they needed replacement.
2002windstar
03-08-2014, 06:59 PM
Let's see how you do without those multiprong plugs.
One thing is for sure.....they needed replacement.
I typically don't fall for marketing hype and am usually skeptical so I am not sure why I fell for the hype behind the Bosch Fusion - what a waste of $$. I do know that when I pulled the original plugs to replace them with the Fusion at 100K miles none looked as bad as these.
Lesson learned.
One thing is for sure.....they needed replacement.
I typically don't fall for marketing hype and am usually skeptical so I am not sure why I fell for the hype behind the Bosch Fusion - what a waste of $$. I do know that when I pulled the original plugs to replace them with the Fusion at 100K miles none looked as bad as these.
Lesson learned.
wiswind
03-08-2014, 07:19 PM
Those displays at the auto part stores really are tempting....so don't feel bad.
For my 2003 Sienna, I replace my spark plugs......LOTS more work vs my Windstar.
I had to remove the upper intake manifold to get the back plugs......1 or 2 of the 3 required that because I have "coil on plug" so I needed the clearance.
In short......I don't want to do this every 30K miles or so.......every 100K or so....I can live with.
I did a LOT of reading.......and there is a smaller electrode plug in the Denso (OE plug) lineup listed for my vehicle.
It is the "IX" power plug.
Looks like an upgrade......more power (like I'm really going to notice it).
I had to really search on the DENSO website....but there it was.......rated "up to 30K miles" vs "up to 120K miles" for the plug my vehicle came with.
So easy to fall into these pitfalls.....as the auto part stores (and websites) list so many plugs for our vehicles that are so different from each other.
It makes me very frustrated because it makes it so difficult to get the right part.....one that is even near correct for the application.
As a side note, my Sienna also has the platinum on the ground tab......but has iridium in the center electrode.
My point to this rant.......this problem is not limited to just 1 vehicle or brand and the person behind the counter is not going to know, they only have what comes up on their computer screen to go by.
For my 2003 Sienna, I replace my spark plugs......LOTS more work vs my Windstar.
I had to remove the upper intake manifold to get the back plugs......1 or 2 of the 3 required that because I have "coil on plug" so I needed the clearance.
In short......I don't want to do this every 30K miles or so.......every 100K or so....I can live with.
I did a LOT of reading.......and there is a smaller electrode plug in the Denso (OE plug) lineup listed for my vehicle.
It is the "IX" power plug.
Looks like an upgrade......more power (like I'm really going to notice it).
I had to really search on the DENSO website....but there it was.......rated "up to 30K miles" vs "up to 120K miles" for the plug my vehicle came with.
So easy to fall into these pitfalls.....as the auto part stores (and websites) list so many plugs for our vehicles that are so different from each other.
It makes me very frustrated because it makes it so difficult to get the right part.....one that is even near correct for the application.
As a side note, my Sienna also has the platinum on the ground tab......but has iridium in the center electrode.
My point to this rant.......this problem is not limited to just 1 vehicle or brand and the person behind the counter is not going to know, they only have what comes up on their computer screen to go by.
scubacat
03-08-2014, 09:31 PM
Those displays at the auto part stores really are tempting....so don't feel bad.
For my 2003 Sienna, I replace my spark plugs......LOTS more work vs my Windstar.
I had to remove the upper intake manifold to get the back plugs......1 or 2 of the 3 required that because I have "coil on plug" so I needed the clearance.
In short......I don't want to do this every 30K miles or so.......every 100K or so....I can live with.
I did a LOT of reading.......and there is a smaller electrode plug in the Denso (OE plug) lineup listed for my vehicle.
It is the "IX" power plug.
Looks like an upgrade......more power (like I'm really going to notice it).
I had to really search on the DENSO website....but there it was.......rated "up to 30K miles" vs "up to 120K miles" for the plug my vehicle came with.
I just did the same job on my 02 camry v6 (same engine basically), and yes, removing the upper intake plenum wasn't too fun (warning: that back valve cover gasket is a REALLY horrendous job.) The previous plugs were the NGK "performance" plugs with the smaller electrode, and after about 50K miles they were completely worn out. I used the same Denso "long life" iridium plugs you used mainly due to the labor involved in replacement, and it feels like I installed a turbo charger or something due to being back to OEM spec. I guess "performance" meant LOWER performance ultimately.
For any modern vehicle, always find out what the manufacturer specs are and stick to that. Anything besides that and you'll almost certainly take a performance and/or longevity hit. With the Windstar, I really would urge using the autolite double platinums, just to stay with OEM equipment. As long as you got ones with the single ground strap you'll probably be ok, though. (Only driving for another year or 2? We'll see about that!!)
For my 2003 Sienna, I replace my spark plugs......LOTS more work vs my Windstar.
I had to remove the upper intake manifold to get the back plugs......1 or 2 of the 3 required that because I have "coil on plug" so I needed the clearance.
In short......I don't want to do this every 30K miles or so.......every 100K or so....I can live with.
I did a LOT of reading.......and there is a smaller electrode plug in the Denso (OE plug) lineup listed for my vehicle.
It is the "IX" power plug.
Looks like an upgrade......more power (like I'm really going to notice it).
I had to really search on the DENSO website....but there it was.......rated "up to 30K miles" vs "up to 120K miles" for the plug my vehicle came with.
I just did the same job on my 02 camry v6 (same engine basically), and yes, removing the upper intake plenum wasn't too fun (warning: that back valve cover gasket is a REALLY horrendous job.) The previous plugs were the NGK "performance" plugs with the smaller electrode, and after about 50K miles they were completely worn out. I used the same Denso "long life" iridium plugs you used mainly due to the labor involved in replacement, and it feels like I installed a turbo charger or something due to being back to OEM spec. I guess "performance" meant LOWER performance ultimately.
For any modern vehicle, always find out what the manufacturer specs are and stick to that. Anything besides that and you'll almost certainly take a performance and/or longevity hit. With the Windstar, I really would urge using the autolite double platinums, just to stay with OEM equipment. As long as you got ones with the single ground strap you'll probably be ok, though. (Only driving for another year or 2? We'll see about that!!)
scubacat
03-08-2014, 09:33 PM
I personally like approx. 100 in lbs. Easy to find on my torque wrench.
.
Its the guys who misread the "in lbs" to be "ft lbs" that strip the holes. Even Clik and Clak once recommended 85 ft lbs for spark plugs (I quit listening right then except for the jokes.)... couldn't believe my ears.
.
But the plug bodies can be damaged at much lower torques ... that's why I make sure to never overtorque.
I turn until I feel resistance and then add 1/4 turn. That's pretty much industry standard. (And getting a torque wrench in the back there would be tricky.)
.
Its the guys who misread the "in lbs" to be "ft lbs" that strip the holes. Even Clik and Clak once recommended 85 ft lbs for spark plugs (I quit listening right then except for the jokes.)... couldn't believe my ears.
.
But the plug bodies can be damaged at much lower torques ... that's why I make sure to never overtorque.
I turn until I feel resistance and then add 1/4 turn. That's pretty much industry standard. (And getting a torque wrench in the back there would be tricky.)
TheBackyardDIYer
03-08-2014, 09:44 PM
I turn until I feel resistance and then add 1/4 turn.
Sounds about right...
Sounds about right...
12Ounce
03-09-2014, 12:40 AM
About plug fouling in a situation that uses a coil pack, such as 99 3.8....
.
After plug service, its beneficial to go around the idling engine using a spark detector, such as a clamp-on inductive type ignition light, to check each/all cables for spark current. This helps prove/indicate that each plug is indeed firing ... and that there is no internal ground fault in the coil pack or along the cables. (Hurrah! For coil on plug evolution!)
.
After plug service, its beneficial to go around the idling engine using a spark detector, such as a clamp-on inductive type ignition light, to check each/all cables for spark current. This helps prove/indicate that each plug is indeed firing ... and that there is no internal ground fault in the coil pack or along the cables. (Hurrah! For coil on plug evolution!)
scubacat
03-09-2014, 01:48 PM
(Hurrah! For coil on plug evolution!)
Yeah, until one of the spark plug tube seals starts leaking on the rear valve cover of a transverse mount V6 in a mid size car. Then you get to spend an entire day and then some taking stuff apart to replace that stupid little thing. (I splurged on the OEM gaskets part due to the labor involved.)
Yeah, until one of the spark plug tube seals starts leaking on the rear valve cover of a transverse mount V6 in a mid size car. Then you get to spend an entire day and then some taking stuff apart to replace that stupid little thing. (I splurged on the OEM gaskets part due to the labor involved.)
2002windstar
03-12-2014, 12:15 AM
Update time.
Wire set came today - put coil pack back on, connected wires to plugs and pack (a little dielectric on each end of the wires), triple checked the connection order on the pack vs cylinder, reinstalled plenum looked everything over and crossed my fingers.
Fired the beast up and low and behold a nice steady purr. Put it in reverse to back it out of the garage and no hesitation or hiccups in the timing, put it drive same thing - nice running engine.
Took it for a 5 mile easy drive and all seems back to normal - now to drive it for a couple of days to get enough engine cycles through to take it for emission testing and renew the plates.
I picked this up in '04 with ~32K miles on it, so I have had it for 10 years and put 135K miles on it - definitely got my moneys worth out of it with nothing more than routine maintenance and a couple of recalls. I really have liked this vehicle, it still rides nice and now that the engine problem appears to have been resolved it should easily hit 200K.
If I could only control the rust on the rockers it would be a perfect vehicle.
Thank you all for the replies and input, I will definitely stick around this forum; I have an '01 Sable with 120K and an "05 Freestar with 123K that I plan on keeping for a while, especially with 2 teenage boys that are driving age.
Wire set came today - put coil pack back on, connected wires to plugs and pack (a little dielectric on each end of the wires), triple checked the connection order on the pack vs cylinder, reinstalled plenum looked everything over and crossed my fingers.
Fired the beast up and low and behold a nice steady purr. Put it in reverse to back it out of the garage and no hesitation or hiccups in the timing, put it drive same thing - nice running engine.
Took it for a 5 mile easy drive and all seems back to normal - now to drive it for a couple of days to get enough engine cycles through to take it for emission testing and renew the plates.
I picked this up in '04 with ~32K miles on it, so I have had it for 10 years and put 135K miles on it - definitely got my moneys worth out of it with nothing more than routine maintenance and a couple of recalls. I really have liked this vehicle, it still rides nice and now that the engine problem appears to have been resolved it should easily hit 200K.
If I could only control the rust on the rockers it would be a perfect vehicle.
Thank you all for the replies and input, I will definitely stick around this forum; I have an '01 Sable with 120K and an "05 Freestar with 123K that I plan on keeping for a while, especially with 2 teenage boys that are driving age.
Automotive Network, Inc., Copyright ©2025
