|
| Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | Air Dried Fresh Beef Dog Food | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
|
#1
11-25-2004, 03:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
k&n fipk or stillen
k&n fipk or stillen: which is the better ?i'm sure that theyre about the same performance wise but which one looks better? ive seen pics of k&n installed but not stillen. stillen is cheaper however i believe. also i read that most performace places recommend stillen for whatever reason. just wondering what you guys think. any suggestions?
|
|
#2
11-25-2004, 05:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: k&n fipk or stillen
Go with what you like to look at, performance-wise they are equal...I think there is an intake comparison done by John Monnin in the FAQ, you have to go to the link...but he compares quite a few intakes. That might help.
__________________
96 3000gt vr4 -K&N FIPK -Proboost mbc -Cusco front + rear strut bars -Greddy type-s -ATR downpipe -no cats -15Gs, 3sx aluminum pulley, FMIC, SAFC, walboro pump, EVO 560ccs, and Meth Injection Kit all waiting to go in shortly. Your 1996 Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 is the 92nd out of the 315 that were made that year. Only 21 of which are exactly identical.
|
|
#4
11-26-2004, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: k&n fipk or stillen
the growl is key for me. i think i like the look of the K&N FIPK better to.
|
|
 |
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
 |
|
|
