Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online!
Automotive Forums .com - the leading automotive community online! 
-
Latest | 0 Rplys
Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons
Register FAQ Community Arcade Calendar
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :)
View Poll Results: Which car?
Prelude SH 12 54.55%
RSX Type-S 10 45.45%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Show Printable Version Show Printable Version | Email this Page Email this Page | Subscription Subscribe to this Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2004, 10:48 PM   #1
Rakshas
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 167
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

Which would you say is the better of these two cars? I mean for a daliy driver that can be used as a track car and stay pretty reliable.

I know they are both hondas so reliability will be pretty good.

The Prelude has the bigger engine, but mkaes the same Hp as the Rsx.

The Rsxx has 143 tq while the lude has 156.

The Rsx has a nicer interior, but the lude extirior looks better (unless the Rsx is equipped with a Type-R kit).

Which would you pick and why?
__________________
Rakshas is offline  
Old 08-25-2004, 10:52 PM   #2
CaTasHtRoPhE 67
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

RSX Type-S
CaTasHtRoPhE 67 is offline  
Old 08-26-2004, 04:19 PM   #3
Dave1669
AF Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The RSX S is faster in a straight line, but the Prelude SH handles better. I like the interior of the RSX better, but the exterior of the Prelude. If I were to pick one overall, I'd go with the Prelude SH. They perform about the same, but the RSX S is more common.
Dave1669 is offline  
Old 08-27-2004, 12:36 AM   #4
Crippy
AF Enthusiast
 
Crippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: orlando, Florida
Posts: 335
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

the rsx is definately faster if its a 5th gen. lude ... the 5th gen. 's weight too much , like 31 or 3200 pounds compared to the 2750*(rough guess) of the type s ... type s has shorter gearing and a much more advanced I-VTEC engine as well . They make a JDM lude that pushes 220hp called the Prelude type S , but the JDM dc5 Integra/RSX type R will out perform that on any race track ... as far as looks goes , i like the RSX a little better but i still love the prelude look alot ...
__________________
2001 GSR ,
94 jdm b18c sir-g swap , i/e !!
Crippy is offline  
Old 10-20-2004, 11:43 AM   #5
bizlipkick
AF Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to bizlipkick
I own a type S- and I love preludes- but I spanked a modded SAH that was a stick- had basic CAI, exhaust, header, by a car and a half. I love the way preludes look though, but there is not much aftermarket support. something to think about...
__________________
---
My Car domain Page http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/710825
bizlipkick is offline  
Old 10-20-2004, 12:36 PM   #6
TatII
AF Fanatic
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: city, New York
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
yup they said it all. the interior goes to RSX hands down. exterior the prelude is much better. performance is similar but the RSX is alittle faster. even though i picked the RSX, the prelude is very very close. ( mostly for looks )
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T
94 Acura NSX


Best E.T. 13.559
Best Trap speed 107.62 mph
TatII is offline  
Old 10-20-2004, 03:27 PM   #7
chevydrummer76
AF Enthusiast
 
chevydrummer76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western, Washington
Posts: 594
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd say the Rsx I really like its styling
chevydrummer76 is offline  
Old 10-20-2004, 05:42 PM   #8
ProjectPhantom
AF Enthusiast
 
ProjectPhantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: gjlkj, California
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

lude all the way! dont get me wrong i'd love a type s but i hate the rear lights... the sh would totally out manuver the rsx easy, so that 200 lb diff wouldnt make too much of a diff with the atts. . and IMO straight lines are for wussies, goin fast in a straight line doesnt prove jack, just depends on how much money you have. takes no skill at all except needing a little experience at shifting.
ProjectPhantom is offline  
Old 11-06-2005, 04:46 AM   #9
OoNismoO
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
id go with the prelude, mainly for its looks. also, the prelude doesnt weigh that much more, its curb weight is right under, or a little more than 3000 lbs. something like 2950-3042 lbs. vs the rsx's curb weight of about 2800 lbs. and the prelude has a slightly bigger engine, so it should make more hp/tq.
OoNismoO is offline  
Old 11-06-2005, 08:29 AM   #10
Zachp911
AF Enthusiast
 
Zachp911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 810
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crippy
the rsx is definately faster if its a 5th gen. lude ... the 5th gen. 's weight too much , like 31 or 3200 pounds compared to the 2750*(rough guess) of the type s...
Just FYI, base model 5th gens weigh 2954 lbs. and SH models weigh 3042 lbs., so I dont know where you're getting 3100/3200 lbs. from

You guys are forgetting the main thing about this comparison. The RSX Type-S is equipped with a K20A engine which is way more responsive to mods than the Prelude's H22A engine, so simple bolt-ons such as I/H/E will make the RSX alot quicker.
__________________
2008 BMW 335i
Zachp911 is offline  
Old 11-06-2005, 09:19 AM   #11
blakscorpion21
AF Enthusiast
 
blakscorpion21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cleveland, Tennessee
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

neither engine is responsive to mods, remember the magazine article where they put 5k in a k20 and got 15hp, thats weak. but i would get a 4th gen lude. the 5th gens are kinda plain as well as the rsx.
__________________
blakscorpion21 is offline  
Old 11-06-2005, 04:20 PM   #12
mason_RsX
AF Enthusiast
 
mason_RsX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Halifax
Posts: 1,274
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Send a message via MSN to mason_RsX
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

Well I/H/E doesn't add a ton of hp tp a car under normal circumstances (obviously depending on the car)

But, the RSX doesn't take well at all to boost, while the H22 apparently does take better to boost than your average Honda

In terms of general drivability, the RSX should be a better option, as its considered one of (if not the most) refined car compared to its competition
__________________


2002 Acura RSX Type-S

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiGNAL748
I have an outrageously large penis.
mason_RsX is offline  
Old 11-06-2005, 11:09 PM   #13
Andee_G
AF Enthusiast
 
Andee_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, California
Posts: 227
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

Quote:
Originally Posted by blakscorpion21
neither engine is responsive to mods, remember the magazine article where they put 5k in a k20 and got 15hp, thats weak. but i would get a 4th gen lude. the 5th gens are kinda plain as well as the rsx.
I heard you can get around 10 hp for i/h/e; shouldn't cost 5000 to get five more. (the k20 is the rsx, right?
)
__________________

"send in the power rangers"
Andee_G is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 12:11 AM   #14
Zanark
AF Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: RIchmond, Virginia
Posts: 468
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

Forget em both and buy a 06 civic Si
__________________
"I DID DRUGS TO STAY REGULAR, I SMOKE BECAUSE IM ADDICTED"
Zanark is offline  
Old 11-07-2005, 08:21 PM   #15
Right_LiRrr
AF Enthusiast
 
Right_LiRrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 820
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Send a message via MSN to Right_LiRrr
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh

I think the prelude is actually quite ugly. Then again the RSX is as well. Lesser of two evils? :P

I'd go for the RSX.
__________________
Rob

Right_LiRrr is offline  
 
Closed Thread

POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD

Go Back   Automotive Forums .com Car Chat > Car Comparisons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.

Community Participation Guidelines | How to use your User Control Panel

Powered by: vBulletin | Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
 
 
no new posts