Search | Car Forums | Gallery | Articles | Helper | AF 350Z | IgorSushko.com | Corporate |
| Latest | 0 Rplys |
|
Car Comparisons Compare any cars and find out what every body else thinks. Just refrain from making stupid comparos like Viper vs. Geo Metro :) |
View Poll Results: Which car? | |||
Prelude SH | 12 | 54.55% | |
RSX Type-S | 10 | 45.45% | |
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll |
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread |
|
Thread Tools |
08-25-2004, 10:48 PM | #1 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 167
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
Which would you say is the better of these two cars? I mean for a daliy driver that can be used as a track car and stay pretty reliable.
I know they are both hondas so reliability will be pretty good. The Prelude has the bigger engine, but mkaes the same Hp as the Rsx. The Rsxx has 143 tq while the lude has 156. The Rsx has a nicer interior, but the lude extirior looks better (unless the Rsx is equipped with a Type-R kit). Which would you pick and why?
__________________
|
|
08-25-2004, 10:52 PM | #2 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 942
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
RSX Type-S
|
|
08-26-2004, 04:19 PM | #3 | |
AF Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 78
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The RSX S is faster in a straight line, but the Prelude SH handles better. I like the interior of the RSX better, but the exterior of the Prelude. If I were to pick one overall, I'd go with the Prelude SH. They perform about the same, but the RSX S is more common.
|
|
08-27-2004, 12:36 AM | #4 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: orlando, Florida
Posts: 335
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
the rsx is definately faster if its a 5th gen. lude ... the 5th gen. 's weight too much , like 31 or 3200 pounds compared to the 2750*(rough guess) of the type s ... type s has shorter gearing and a much more advanced I-VTEC engine as well . They make a JDM lude that pushes 220hp called the Prelude type S , but the JDM dc5 Integra/RSX type R will out perform that on any race track ... as far as looks goes , i like the RSX a little better but i still love the prelude look alot ...
__________________
2001 GSR , 94 jdm b18c sir-g swap , i/e !! |
|
10-20-2004, 11:43 AM | #5 | |
AF Newbie
|
I own a type S- and I love preludes- but I spanked a modded SAH that was a stick- had basic CAI, exhaust, header, by a car and a half. I love the way preludes look though, but there is not much aftermarket support. something to think about...
__________________
--- My Car domain Page http://www.cardomain.com/memberpage/710825 |
|
10-20-2004, 12:36 PM | #6 | |
AF Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: city, New York
Posts: 5,761
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
yup they said it all. the interior goes to RSX hands down. exterior the prelude is much better. performance is similar but the RSX is alittle faster. even though i picked the RSX, the prelude is very very close. ( mostly for looks )
__________________
303whp stock internal KA-T 94 Acura NSX Best E.T. 13.559 Best Trap speed 107.62 mph |
|
10-20-2004, 03:27 PM | #7 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Western, Washington
Posts: 594
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I'd say the Rsx I really like its styling
|
|
10-20-2004, 05:42 PM | #8 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: gjlkj, California
Posts: 243
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
lude all the way! dont get me wrong i'd love a type s but i hate the rear lights... the sh would totally out manuver the rsx easy, so that 200 lb diff wouldnt make too much of a diff with the atts. . and IMO straight lines are for wussies, goin fast in a straight line doesnt prove jack, just depends on how much money you have. takes no skill at all except needing a little experience at shifting.
|
|
11-06-2005, 04:46 AM | #9 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 265
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
id go with the prelude, mainly for its looks. also, the prelude doesnt weigh that much more, its curb weight is right under, or a little more than 3000 lbs. something like 2950-3042 lbs. vs the rsx's curb weight of about 2800 lbs. and the prelude has a slightly bigger engine, so it should make more hp/tq.
|
|
11-06-2005, 08:29 AM | #10 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 810
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Re: Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
Quote:
You guys are forgetting the main thing about this comparison. The RSX Type-S is equipped with a K20A engine which is way more responsive to mods than the Prelude's H22A engine, so simple bolt-ons such as I/H/E will make the RSX alot quicker.
__________________
2008 BMW 335i |
||
11-06-2005, 09:19 AM | #11 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: cleveland, Tennessee
Posts: 1,338
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
neither engine is responsive to mods, remember the magazine article where they put 5k in a k20 and got 15hp, thats weak. but i would get a 4th gen lude. the 5th gens are kinda plain as well as the rsx.
__________________
|
|
11-06-2005, 04:20 PM | #12 | ||
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
Well I/H/E doesn't add a ton of hp tp a car under normal circumstances (obviously depending on the car)
But, the RSX doesn't take well at all to boost, while the H22 apparently does take better to boost than your average Honda In terms of general drivability, the RSX should be a better option, as its considered one of (if not the most) refined car compared to its competition
__________________
2002 Acura RSX Type-S Quote:
|
||
11-06-2005, 11:09 PM | #13 | ||
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Luis Obispo, California
Posts: 227
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
Quote:
)
__________________
"send in the power rangers" |
||
11-07-2005, 12:11 AM | #14 | |
AF Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: RIchmond, Virginia
Posts: 468
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
Forget em both and buy a 06 civic Si
__________________
"I DID DRUGS TO STAY REGULAR, I SMOKE BECAUSE IM ADDICTED" |
|
11-07-2005, 08:21 PM | #15 | |
AF Enthusiast
|
Re: 2004 RSX Type-S vs 2001 Prelude Sh
I think the prelude is actually quite ugly. Then again the RSX is as well. Lesser of two evils? :P
I'd go for the RSX.
__________________
Rob |
|
|
POST REPLY TO THIS THREAD |
|
|