Civic Type R

[SolReaver]

My god 196.6 lb-ft. That's alot of torque for a civic, but it will only be in Japan and Europe



2.0 DOHC i-VTEC in-line four
compression ratio: 11.4:1
Power and torque
200hp@7,400 rpm
196.6lb-ft@6,500 rpm

[HXMan]

You have got to be kidding me?

196 ft-lbs out of a 2.0 liter 4? Are you sure that is right? About the only way I know of a four cylinder to make that kinda torque is via a TURBO!

Man, where did you get those figures from???!!

THAT CAR NEEDS TO COME HERE!! I WANT TO KILL ECLIPSE GST's AND TALON TSI's WITH IT!!! DAMN!!

[SolReaver]

Give thanks to Super Street. I sorry it's only 196 not 196.6lbs, and we don't get it. WHY!!!!

[enzo@af]

Hey, Solreaver....why don't you drop that mad engine into a Del Sol...that's gotta be your dream car, eh?

[johnny]

Gotta hand it to Honda. They've always got something up their sleeve.

[DVSNCYNIKL]

Now they just need to stop bs'ing and get to making! Damnit!

[flylwsi]

HXman... you forgot a good n/a buildup, or a supercharger...

and i'm sure there are 4cyl cars right here with us that are puttin down about 200tq at the flywheel... and i bet they arent turbo...
just a thought...
i just wish that people would stop depressing me with all these damn import jdm numbers...

like a subaru wrx sti... 280hp w/ 17, and 13in brembos all around....
its not in my garage... no good man...
they should bring those cars here... we have all the damn money in this world!!!!!

[JD@af]

...but I can almost guarantee that this 196 lb-ft. of torque figure is bullshit. Those of you that think Superstreet is a reliable source for technical info should think again. I say almost guarantee, because I cannot back this up, except that all the confirmed data I have seen suggests that this figure for torque is bogus. And everything I have seen and read about Honda engines agrees with this notion.

Hate to be the dick here, but somebody's gotta set the record straight.

[kris]

Well, Nissans new 2002 SE-R Will be throwing up numbers like that, without a turbo, or vvli. Nissan’s new all alloy QR25DE 4-cylinder puts out 170 bhp and 175 ft-lbs of torque. In the Spec V, it pumps out 180hp and 180 ft-lbs of torque due to a larger exhaust system. I do have to agree JD, Honduhs are generally weaker on the torque. It is hard to believe they can have it matched up with the HP rating.

[Jay!]

Originally posted by JD@af
Those of you that think Super Street is a reliable source for technical info should think again.

I know that Supet Street takes cars to my friend's shop to test them on the dyno. I can't speak for this CTR in particular, but if SolReaver would be so kind to dig the article up again and quote the sources at the end of the article, if there are any. One should be the place where they tested it. If not, they may have been pitching rumours, in which case, you'd be right.

[JD@af]

Like most highly commercialized auto review magazines, SuperStreet goes with "rumorville" type sources of information, which this data on the CTR most likely is.

[SolReaver]

Posted by enzo
Hey, Solreaver....why don't you drop that mad engine into a Del Sol...that's gotta be your dream car, eh?

That would be so awsome!

[Worshp]

Is the figure definitely in lb-ft, or is it in Newton Metres (nm?)???

The JDM ITR had 178nm of torque?

[Moppie]

I was thinking the same thing Worshp, most car mags state the new 2.0L i-VTEC's has having around 190-/+ Newton Meters of Torque, which is about average for a 2l 4.

[Jay!]

Originally posted by SolReaver
My god 196.6 lb-ft. That's alot of torque for a civic, but it will only be in Japan and Europe

2.0 DOHC i-VTEC in-line four
compression ratio: 11.4:1
Power and torque
200hp@7,400 rpm
196.6lb-ft@6,500 rpm

Well, SolReaver, where did you dig that number up?

In the September 2000 issue of Super Street they featured a 1999 CTR and quoted 117 lb-ft of torque at 7500 rpm. They actually called it "measly." They also say that it's annoyingly loud after about an hour in the car, and recommend earplugs.